Real 9-11 Research

[RandomGuy]

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746


There's some evidence that 9/11 was an inside job that's too clear for you shills to obfuscate.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums...pic.php?t=1222


This picture shows the kind a damage that the wings of an airliner would do to a wall.
http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d...37c495d8834-pi


The fourth picture from the top of this page shows the side of the Pentagon before the collapse.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

That damage isn't consistent with wings having hit the walls.

Here's a related article.
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/A...March2006.html


This picture shows the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon and it's obviously not the nose of a 757.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

This proof shows that the craft that hit the Pentangon was too short to be a 757.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

This closes the whole case by itself.

It takes a bit of study to see all of the evidence of an inside job.
http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php...-bunkersq.html

Objective thinking people who think it wasn't an inside job simply have taken the time to look at the evidence yet. People who have looked at the evidence and still don't think it was an inside job are usually in denial because they're experiencing cognitive dissonance.
http://www.learningandteaching.info/...dissonance.htm

That's understandable I suppose. Here's a video for those people to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4

Just ignore the shills.

How about I just ignore the sanity-challenged conspiracy theorists instead?

LOL cognitive dissonance.

Here is a video for you people to watch.



From an interesting movie made in Britain about the second coming of Christ.


(edit) It has nothing to do with the topic, I just like Orbital.

[ChumpDumper]

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746


There's some evidence that 9/11 was an inside job that's too clear for you shills to obfuscate.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums...pic.php?t=1222


This picture shows the kind a damage that the wings of an airliner would do to a wall.
http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d...37c495d8834-pi


The fourth picture from the top of this page shows the side of the Pentagon before the collapse.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

That damage isn't consistent with wings having hit the walls.

Here's a related article.
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/A...March2006.html


This picture shows the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon and it's obviously not the nose of a 757.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

This proof shows that the craft that hit the Pentangon was too short to be a 757.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

This closes the whole case by itself.

It takes a bit of study to see all of the evidence of an inside job.
http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php...-bunkersq.html

Objective thinking people who think it wasn't an inside job simply have taken the time to look at the evidence yet. People who have looked at the evidence and still don't think it was an inside job are usually in denial because they're experiencing cognitive dissonance.
http://www.learningandteaching.info/...dissonance.htm

That's understandable I suppose. Here's a video for those people to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4

Just ignore the shills.

No one is going to watch any of these.

What do you think really happened on 9/11, Cosmored?

In your own words.

Let's hear it all.

[Nbadan]

Have you written the NIST to ask them why, dan?

Yes or no.

People are sheep...the corrupt M$M has successfully put out the perception that any 'truther' talk equals 'birther' talk....except....they neglect to mention... 'truther' talk is based on real facts and science...were as birther talk is bull ....and you got crazies like Alex Jones who muddy the waters...

[ChumpDumper]

People are sheep...the corrupt M$M has successfully put out the perception that any 'truther' talk equals 'birther' talk....except....they neglect to mention... 'truther' talk is based on real facts and science...were as birther talk is bull ....and you got crazies like Alex Jones who muddy the waters...

Have you written the NIST to ask them why, dan?

Yes or no.

[Nbadan]

I still stand by my original point....there needs to be a another investigation just on what we know now.....scientifically.....but also what we know factually......Tenet lying...committee members lied to and threatened....funding cut short....more money was spent to investigate a blow job than the worst terror attack in the Nation's history....

...not on my watch! ...not on my watch...

[ChumpDumper]

I still stand by my original point....there needs to be a another investigation just on what we know now.....scientifically.....but also what we know factually......Tenet lying...committee members lied to and threatened....funding cut short....more money was spent to investigate a blow job than the worst terror attack in the Nation's history....

...not on my watch! ...not on my watch...

Have you written the NIST to ask them why, dan?

Yes or no.

[Nbadan]

Have you written the NIST to ask them why, dan?

Yes or no.

National Security bull ....


Let's investigate NIST while we're at it.....there is tons of proof they broke laws in their own investigation...

[ChumpDumper]

National Security bull ....


Let's investigate NIST while we're at it.....there is tons of proof they broke laws in their own investigation...

Have you written the NIST to ask them why, dan?

Yes or no.

[Nbadan]

I called them....got the machine, left a message, but they haven't called back...


maybe I missed the call? Do they have an 800 number?

[ChumpDumper]

I called them....got the machine, left a message, but they haven't called back...

What number did you use?

[ChumpDumper]

Need to google it?

We'll wait.

[RandomGuy]

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746


There's some evidence that 9/11 was an inside job that's too clear for you shills to obfuscate.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums...pic.php?t=1222


This picture shows the kind a damage that the wings of an airliner would do to a wall.
http://jabbajoo.typepad.com/.a/6a00d...37c495d8834-pi


The fourth picture from the top of this page shows the side of the Pentagon before the collapse.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

That damage isn't consistent with wings having hit the walls.

Here's a related article.
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/A...March2006.html


This picture shows the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon and it's obviously not the nose of a 757.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

This proof shows that the craft that hit the Pentangon was too short to be a 757.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

This closes the whole case by itself.

It takes a bit of study to see all of the evidence of an inside job.
http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php...-bunkersq.html

edit
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry. I meant to post this article instead of the above one.
http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php...11-story-.html
--------------------------------------------------------------

Objective thinking people who think it wasn't an inside job simply have taken the time to look at the evidence yet. People who have looked at the evidence and still don't think it was an inside job are usually in denial because they're experiencing cognitive dissonance.
http://www.learningandteaching.info/...dissonance.htm

That's understandable I suppose. Here's a video for those people to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4

Just ignore the shills.

[Nbadan]

Not so real research after all...

For more than a decade, questions have lingered about the possible role of the Saudi government in the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, even as the royal kingdom has made itself a crucial counterterrorism partner in the eyes of American diplomats.

Now, in sworn statements that seem likely to reignite the debate, two former senators who were privy to top secret information on the Saudis’ activities say they believe that the Saudi government might have played a direct role in the terrorist attacks.

“I am convinced that there was a direct line between at least some of the terrorists who carried out the September 11th attacks and the government of Saudi Arabia,” former Senator Bob Graham, Democrat of Florida, said in an affidavit filed as part of a lawsuit brought against the Saudi government and dozens of ins utions in the country by families of Sept. 11 victims and others. Mr. Graham led a joint 2002 Congressional inquiry into the attacks.

His former Senate colleague, Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, a Democrat who served on the separate 9/11 Commission, said in a sworn affidavit of his own in the case that “significant questions remain unanswered” about the role of Saudi ins utions. “Evidence relating to the plausible involvement of possible Saudi government agents in the September 11th attacks has never been fully pursued,” Mr. Kerrey said.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/01/us...9-11-link.html

[ChumpDumper]

Not so real research after all...



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/01/us...9-11-link.html

Great, tell us how this fits in with your theory about what really happened on 9/11.

[RandomGuy]

Looks like Cosmored wants another round. meh.

[DarrinS]

Debating twoofers is soo 2007

[RandomGuy]

Debating twoofers is soo 2007

Debating them is 2007.

Making fun of them however... when will that go out of style?

[Nbadan]

So......NIST released their research data for peer review and admitted they broke their own policies (laws) when they investigated WTC7?

[Nbadan]

...and what of those cell phone calls from airplanes....

RG has a short memory.....

[spursncowboys]

Debating them is 2007.

Making fun of them however... when will that go out of style?

You might as well be Faith Hilling.

[mouse]

Not so real research after all...



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/01/us...9-11-link.html

[GSH]

How about I just ignore the sanity-challenged conspiracy theorists instead?

You mean like Van Jones? The really funny thing is that a big percentage of the hard-core truthers are from the hard left.

-----

Mr. Jones signed a statement for 911Truth.org in 2004 demanding an investigation into what the Bush Administration may have done that “deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.”

His name is listed with 99 other prominent signatories supporting such an investigation on the 911Truth.org website, including Code Pink co-founders Medea Benjamin and Jodi Evans, comedienne Janeane Garofalo, Democratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney of Georgia and others. He's identified as the executive director for the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights on the statement, which he founded before going to the White House. The statement is available here. Mr. Jones is number 46.

Mike Berger, a spokesman for 911Truth.org, told the Washington Times over the phone that all of the signers had been verified by their group. He said 9/11Truth.org board members “spoke with each person on the list by phone or through email to individually confirm they had added their name to that list.”

[Blake]

...Meanwhile, Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., called for an investigation of Jones, who signed a 2004 pe ion by 911Truth.org, which wants attention paid to "unanswered questions that suggest that people within the (Bush) Administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war."

[Van] Jones, a Yale Law School graduate, said in a statement Friday, "I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...#ixzz1qldOEfnS

[RandomGuy]

...and what of those cell phone calls from airplanes....

RG has a short memory.....

Debunked. There were no cell phone calls from the planes.

Fact fail, and already more than addressed in this thread.

[RandomGuy]

You mean like Van Jones? The really funny thing is that a big percentage of the hard-core truthers are from the hard left.

-----

Mr. Jones signed a statement for 911Truth.org in 2004 demanding an investigation into what the Bush Administration may have done that “deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.”

His name is listed with 99 other prominent signatories supporting such an investigation on the 911Truth.org website, including Code Pink co-founders Medea Benjamin and Jodi Evans, comedienne Janeane Garofalo, Democratic Rep. Cynthia McKinney of Georgia and others. He's identified as the executive director for the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights on the statement, which he founded before going to the White House. The statement is available here. Mr. Jones is number 46.

Mike Berger, a spokesman for 911Truth.org, told the Washington Times over the phone that all of the signers had been verified by their group. He said 9/11Truth.org board members “spoke with each person on the list by phone or through email to individually confirm they had added their name to that list.”

Indeed. Left, right, whatever their political stripe... they are nutters.

The right has its scary creationists and global warming deniers, and the left has 9-11 nuttters.