I don't blame you. I had actually completely forgotten about Hill until you brought him up in that other post.
But yeah, Splitter played his best pick and roll with Manu and Hill last season. Neal wasn't running the point and Splitter didn't really play with Parker back then so to an extent that's by default.
Now that I've actually thought about the topic though, the fact that he did play decent pnr with Hill shows that some of it is his own abilities and I'd say that Pop and the make-up of the Spurs offense has maximized him on that play more.
I think there's another post in this thread that said something to the effect that Splitter played the pnr in Europe and was able to get open and produce at a high level (MVP) but is doing even better in the NBA. To me that's where your take on the spacing, shooters, and importance of Manu/TP comes in.
So, yeah, I'm still inclined to say that it's a combination of both factors at work there because there are other players on our team (Blair anyone?) who can roll on the same play but won't produce at the same level. Splitter has one of the highest conversion rates in the league on that play I think.
Nice sum-up. I may be selling Splitter a bit short then, or I am just so spoiled by his high conversion that his failed pnr's look awful by comparison
In Blair's defense, I think teams have scouted his 10 foot runner and occasional set shot- so Blair's man doesn't leave him nearly as much as Splitter's man does. Blair being shorter does handicap his finishing rate compared to Splitter's, but the main thing is that his man doesn't leave him as much. Otherwise I think he does almost as well as Splitter. I also think the tendency to double Manu when he goes left is the reason Blair and Ginobili pnr works so well.
As counter intuitive as it sounds, Blair's 10 foot range hurts him. If he were to increase the range like Timmy or (eliminate the 10 foot shot altogether like Tiago) he would be much more valuable. Him being able to score only 10 feet away in the paint or closer gives his defender kind of a safety net, like "if I double Manu/TP it's ok because my guy is only a few steps away". So either they honor the runner and don't leave him at all, but if they do leave him and Blair doesn't cut hard--the pnr with Dejuan is basically pointless because he doesn't draw defenders far enough. Not to mention his height hampers things.
Last edited by justinandimcool; 05-07-2012 at 04:36 PM.
It's a combo of a lot of things, IMO. A lot of it has to do with the Spurs make up.
It starts with Manu and Tony's threat to penetrate. When there's a pick, the other team's defense light bulb goes off and they don't even think about hedging- they just double. And when the 3rd defender is late on the help Splitter just makes a hard cut to the basket and he's open.
The reason the 3rd defender is usually late is because of the Spurs shooters. When Tiago's out there, it's usually Bonner or Jack that are at the three point line. Defenders are wary of leaving them, so if they do help on the cutter it'll only be halfway. And Splitter is such a good finisher at the rim that halfway help defense isn't going to stop him.
The reason he has more success than Duncan/Blair? Because he's a worse shooter. He can't shoot outside of 5 feet, and everyone in the NBA knows this. So when there's a pnr, HIS defender has no qualms leaving him because he's thinking "if he just pops he won't shoot, and if he gets all the way inside then my help has plenty of time to get there". Problem is the help doesn't get there, and if he does then a shooter's open.
Hayes knows the help should already be set, so he doubles Parker to eliminate the penetration. Problem is Jimmer and Garcia are only half ready, because they know a kickout to Bonner or Jack is likely if they're too far in. So this half-assed help allows Tiago to basically be uncontested. If Jack and Bonner aren't shooters, the help defense commits at the free throw line, Tiago doesn't get as easy a shot. If TP isn't a threat to drive (problem for the D is, Neal/Patty/Manu are also threats to get in the paint), Hayes stays put and doesn't even bother helping on the PG.
Same thing on the GSW play. Double Manu, the help is weak because of the shooters. Splitter with an easy one.
In this play NJ gambles and leaves Mattie, so they actually help all the way. Problem is they're the Nets and they suck, so the defense is late anyways and Splitter gets the dunk. But if a good/non sucky defender were to try this, Splitter may not be wide open, but because they helped all the way Bonner is wide open for a three.
Perhaps the biggest example of my points. Double Manu, Cunningham is RIGHT THERE but he's like "OH I FORGOT THE GINGER" leaving the lane wide open.
So yeah:
1) Manu/TP/Neal's threat to penetrate breaks down the defense early as it causes doubles on the screens. (if we had Hill running the point, Splitter would not nearly be as effective).
2) Weak help defense because the shooters are always a threat. (If we had Bogans, the defense would not be as adamant about leaving the shooter. I'm interested to see how Splitter does when Kawhi's on the floor, because he's not as deadly as our other wings from outside).
3) Splitter isn't a threat from the outside like Timmy or even from 10 feet like Blair, so Splitter's guy will almost always help double on the PG, leaving Tiago free to cut.
I'd say it has a lot to do with his teammate's abilities, though Splitter's talent for the pnr is still pretty good.
Can Diaw handle the ball well enough to run the pnr with Splitter? I can just imagine Gasol and Bynum stumbling around trying to keep up. Just add in Manu, Neal, and Green/Jax camped out around the arc; open shot every time, no?
Nice sum-up. I may be selling Splitter a bit short then, or I am just so spoiled by his high conversion that his failed pnr's look awful by comparison
In Blair's defense, I think teams have scouted his 10 foot runner and occasional set shot- so Blair's man doesn't leave him nearly as much as Splitter's man does. Blair being shorter does handicap his finishing rate compared to Splitter's, but the main thing is that his man doesn't leave him as much. Otherwise I think he does almost as well as Splitter. I also think the tendency to double Manu when he goes left is the reason Blair and Ginobili pnr works so well.
As counter intuitive as it sounds, Blair's 10 foot range hurts him. If he were to increase the range like Timmy or (eliminate the 10 foot shot altogether like Tiago) he would be much more valuable. Him being able to score only 10 feet away in the paint or closer gives his defender kind of a safety net, like "if I double Manu/TP it's ok because my guy is only a few steps away". So either they honor the runner and don't leave him at all, but if they do leave him and Blair doesn't cut hard--the pnr with Dejuan is basically pointless because he doesn't draw defenders far enough. Not to mention his height hampers things.
Actually that's exactly Tiago's problem. He makes more often than not but when he misses it's *really* ugly. I'm hoping with a little more time on the court he can settle in. He's shown signs of a developing post game and he seems to learn quickly. I suspect the transition would be ugly but once he puts it together he could be a (relative) beast imo.
Completely agree on Dejuan. Starting him definitely hasn't done him in any favours (other than make his defense look passable) but I think he could be a useful player off the bench. I think that even if he's moved to the second unit that he would probably still need to extend his range a little more. In a perfect world he'd be more like Malik Rose in terms of skill level.
As for the numbers, I found this article.
"While DeJuan's points per possessions as the roll man are still great (1.16 PPP, good for 17th in the league) Tiago Splitter's are far superior (1.39 PPP, good for 2nd in the league). What Blair does well on offense, Splitter does better (1.21 PPP in offensive boards) and he's a much more productive player both in the post (0.76 PPP for Tiago, 0.68 for DeJuan) and cutting to the basket (1.27 PPP for Tiago, 1.17 PPP for DeJuan)."
I knew Tiago was one of the best as the roll man but I definitely wasn't expecting him to be 2nd in the league tbh.
This has probably already been posted on this board but here's the link if you're interested in the rest.
Splitter has been doing the P&R professionally since he was 18. It is an acquired talent honed by years of practice.
Notice that he has great hands and catches many passes that most centers would miss and this helps when you have passers like Manu who often try--and succeed because Splitter makes the catch--to thread the needle with a difficult bounce pass or a pass that has a very small window of opportunity.
A passer like Manu makes Splitter look good but conversely a player like Splitter makes the passer look good as well. A beautiful symbiosis between players that complement each other.
1) Manu/TP/Neal's threat to penetrate breaks down the defense early as it causes doubles on the screens. (if we had Hill running the point, Splitter would not nearly be as effective).
While Manu and TP obviously help Splitter get open, Splitter has been successful with many others -- including Jackson and Neal. In fact, statistically, Neal is actually Splitter's most lethal pick-and-roll partner.
Plus, this doesn't explain why he was such a beast in Europe in pick-and-rolls.
2) Weak help defense because the shooters are always a threat. (If we had Bogans, the defense would not be as adamant about leaving the shooter. I'm interested to see how Splitter does when Kawhi's on the floor, because he's not as deadly as our other wings from outside).
Good point. Specifically, the Spurs keeping Bonner next to Splitter a lot certainly helps open up the court.
3) Splitter isn't a threat from the outside like Timmy or even from 10 feet like Blair, so Splitter's guy will almost always help double on the PG, leaving Tiago free to cut.
Eh, I can't buy that. Splitter doesn't get open because he can't shoot. No one is rushing to pick up Blair any other interior oriented bigmen in the league and they don't get so wide open.
Splitter has outstanding agility and good physical tools for a big, he's more like a power forward than a center when it comes to athleticism. Even fellow Brazilian Anderson Varejao was fantastic at setting screens and being a mobile big body on the court, but Sideshow Bob's offensive game is garbage compared to Tiago's.
Tiago never gives up on the chance of getting the ball, he's always moving and getting an open look
Timing? Technique? Awareness? Why is he more open? What makes him more effective than so many other players?
Some of his success comes from his excellent footwork and how he flares a bit on the roll to get an extra couple of feet of spacing. What say ye?
Tony yelled at him in game 3 for doing just that when his pass went astray. The funny thing is that the "banana cut" is almost like flaring on a 2 on one break. You force a decision and make the ball handler's life a LOT easier.
They actually play real team basketball outside the USA when they are young. And learn actual plays and how to run them. They do this over and over and over again until it's instinctual. And they are praised for it. Instead of one-on-one play, three-point shots, and open dunks being the things that are celebrated like they are here.
Splitter has been doing the P&R professionally since he was 18. It is an acquired talent honed by years of practice.
Notice that he has great hands and catches many passes that most centers would miss and this helps when you have passers like Manu who often try--and succeed because Splitter makes the catch--to thread the needle with a difficult bounce pass or a pass that has a very small window of opportunity.
A passer like Manu makes Splitter look good but conversely a player like Splitter makes the passer look good as well. A beautiful symbiosis between players that complement each other.
I agree he has been doing so long that it is second nature to make the cut. But he has been doing it since he was 15 not 18. Manu has been doing it for the last 16 to 18 years at a high level.
There is one thing I think needs to be pointed out about Splitter. His first step after the screen is so quick that he is moving before the defender knows where he is going. And that step is directly at the basket. He is not fast just quick with that first step.
If one is slow, and has good timing, thats a good thing.
If one is quick laterally, and has good timing, thats a great thing.
I also think his quick feet help him to use the appropriate amount of his body to set the screen. He gets his body at the correct angle so he can use most of it if needed. This also means good ability to read the changing angle of the dribbler and pace of the dribbler. Does the screen require just a bit of a brush because Tony or Manu are at high speed?, or is a herky jerky move that requires longer body contact before breaking it off... Tiago can sense it.
Now get his hands better in traffic like Tim, and go up with the ball strong using his body a bit more, and he will really excel. Hit more FT's when foulded... Lots of upside to Tiago.
It still amazes me how little vertical both he an Tim have though... Tim never had it and now I think he actually jumps into the floor, a negative vertical(last year anyway). Triple that with Bonner. we cannot jump.