Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Ur a fkn wanker Venti Quattro's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    29,402
    I have some 320 kbps MP3 files that I want to convert to M4A, because I have read that M4A files have better sound quality while having a smaller file size.

    If I do it in iTunes and I convert it to about 160/192 kbps in M4A, will it have the same sound quality as a 320 kbps MP3?

  2. #2
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    doesnt fkn make a difference man

  3. #3
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    M4A is just a container format. What you want to know is the actual codec. iTunes uses AAC, which is a lossy codec like MP3. M4A also supports lossless codecs like ALAC, but I don't think iTunes uses it (not sure).

    AAC in general will have better resolution than MP3 at the same bitrate, because it's a codec that was originally designed to work around most of the MP3 codec issues. It's still lossy though.

    Here's an article comparing AAC vs MP3 vs FLAC vs CD...

    http://www.stereophile.com/features/308mp3cd

  4. #4
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    BTW, as far as bitrate numbers, IIRC, a 128 kbps AAC should sound just as good as a 160 kpbs MP3, and be a smaller size. With that ratio in mind, you probably want to encode in 256 kbps AAC (the source 320kbps MP3s).

  5. #5
    Ur a fkn wanker Venti Quattro's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    29,402
    I tried to convert one file from MP3 320 to AAC 160 and it sounded just the same while having half the file size. I think I already have my answer.

  6. #6
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    3,009
    provided you have the disk space and good speaker/headphones, you should go for FLAC, it sounds much better than MP3.

  7. #7
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    I tried to convert one file from MP3 320 to AAC 160 and it sounded just the same while having half the file size. I think I already have my answer.
    Well, that's another thing. What can you hear, or what you care to hear...

  8. #8
    Ur a fkn wanker Venti Quattro's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    29,402
    provided you have the disk space and good speaker/headphones, you should go for FLAC, it sounds much better than MP3.
    FLAC is near-CD quality and also takes up CD-quality space in the HD. I only have a 500 GB drive so far.

  9. #9
    Ur a fkn wanker Venti Quattro's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    29,402
    Well, that's another thing. What can you hear, or what you care to hear...
    What do you mean? lol I probably suck at this. I tried to look for differences but I couldn't find any. I tried playing the two files in iTunes, VLC, Media player classic, WMP 12 and Quicktime.

  10. #10
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    What do you mean? lol I probably suck at this. I tried to look for differences but I couldn't find any. I tried playing the two files in iTunes, VLC, Media player classic, WMP 12 and Quicktime.
    What I mean is some people simply have a better ear... or better speakers/headphones... I'm fairly deaf, tbh... unless quality is dismal, I probably won't notice.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •