Reply With Quote
tbh, coming from South America, it was frankly shocking the prevalence of cir cision here in the US, especially since it's well known that the alleged benefits are mostly a myth.
What does hygiene has to do with it? And Africa has more cir cisions than America, per the WHO:
Heck, outside US/Africa/Australia, the rest of the world are perfectly hygienic and are not cir cised...
lol researching the topic
tbh, coming from South America, it was frankly shocking the prevalence of cir cision here in the US, especially since it's well known that the alleged benefits are mostly a myth.
acting like not mutilating German babies without their consent drastically puts their health at danger
as far as the topic, I agree that if anything, you should be allowed to sue your parents... they're supposed to be the rational thinkers in the room...
i just can't imagine how an advanced country could be so backwards and dumb ed at the same time, yikes.
anyway wish me luck in my case guys, i hope i win. i don't wanna be forced to go the vigilante route, but the son of a will pay one way or another.
Ignorant people get taken advantage of all the time, tbh... not a crime...
when its a violation of human rights though, it is. parents cannot legally consent to a non necessary procedure is what people aren't getting. people can and have sued, i'm going to be the next.
lol
Here is a site that might be of help and comfort to some of the self-loathing cir cised posters:
http://www.restoringforeskin.org/why...-your-foreskin
if cir cision was so awesome then there wouldn't be tons of sites like these, but thanks id rather hold out for an advancement in regenerative medicine tbh
you're not as hip and progressive as you think obviously
Because I find your e-thuggery amusing?
a progressive would be pro human rights, rather than making snarky comments
You're going to staple his foreskin to your penis.
stop nitpicking my posts and address everyone who is anti-cir cision in this thread, there are lots of us.
Why? I'm only making fun of your preputial vendetta.
So you are assuming the Germans did not take German socioeconomic conditions into consideration.
Is mingus a German name?
At the risk of Mingus thinking that his argument has merit, I am not sure that ze germans took hygiene into consideration at all. This is a court case and from what I gather it was brought on the grounds that it should be unlawful to attack a baby with cutting tools.
I could be completely wrong here since I didn't read the case notes or anything, but I would only really agree with you if it was a new law being discussed.
that razor better not touch the 5 cornersJews defending cir cision is almost as hilarious as Jews defending kosher tradition and the bull reasons they come up with.
You can't cook a baby in its mother's milk!
And someone who actually gave two s about ending/slowing cir cision as a practice would probably channel that energy into some sort of activism and increased awareness rather than whining on a message board, suing doctors, and threatening physical violence all because his poor wittle snipped noodle forces him to have orgasms that aren't quite as satisfying as they possibly could be. Oh, the horror.
Incidentally, I actually am anti-cir cision. I do think it is an unnecessarily brutal procedure whose benefits are overblown and whose popularity is due to nothing more than aesthetics. I think parents AND doctors should be better informed about what the procedure actually does and that people should get over their hangups about what an uncir cised looks like. If I planned to have kids, I wouldn't even consider cir cision for my sons.
That said, as a woman, I have relatively little sympathy for the moaning and groaning some men do on the subject. Especially when those men are in fact fully functional and are still able to enjoy sex. Medical research moves heaven and earth to stay on top of penile function, while lady parts are largely ignored and female sexual dysfunction goes largely untreated. Or is treated inefficiently. Or is dismissed as a mental problem. Because, after all, we're just supposed to lay there and quietly tolerate it anyway.
pffft nice try. Female cir cision (Cir cision is the topic, not laying there during sex) is widely condemned as a cruel and brutal practice. Male cir cision is widely seen as just the opposite. It's the same thing.
As a man, I have little sympathy for a woman moaning and groaning about being cir cised. smh
Female sexual dysfunction =/= female cir cision.
Edit to clarify:
My lack of sympathy doesn't lessen or otherwise affect my stance as being anti-cir cision. Rather, it affects the degree to which I support litigious actions or restorative surgeries/procedures. To continue with m>s as an example, this is a young man who claims to be getting laid a lot and claims to be enjoying his sexual encounters, but is whining because something he read on the interwebs told him he could be enjoying it a little more. Boo ing hoo. Be outraged. I get that. Become an activist. I get that, too. But the time, energy, and resources used up in a legal case could be better spent elsewhere.
Last edited by CuckingFunt; 06-28-2012 at 11:07 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
