Reply With Quote
Agreed that it goes further....but let's be honest, who are the biggest haters of sexuals besides teenaged phobes?
This goes farther than religion. I think the majority of people that say it's not "natural" are speaking to the point that the reason for sex is the propagation of a species. And it's pretty clear that the intended function of the rectum is to deliver poop from the body.
Agreed that it goes further....but let's be honest, who are the biggest haters of sexuals besides teenaged phobes?
Good job.
That'll teach me.
Well played. Your work is improving. See if the OP would have lead with something like this he could have played the humor angle and we all would have had a good laugh but instead he thought being a bigot and intolerant ignoramus would somehow be entertaining.
oh...not disagreeing at all on that point.
There's really no value in either point. If that were true then why not legislate intolerance towards impotence or barron women. This without even addressing transgender and gender morphing that occurs in a number of species.
Anything that can or does occur regularly is natural.
Its also pretty clear that the intended function of the mouth is eating and talking so why not attack those who kiss or orally copulate. I'm pretty sure the OP isn't against that.
It's true. I think kissing has to do with the fact that we have to wear clothes which prohibits humans from the natural form of showing interest and affection by sniffing each others crotches.
Okay say this back2basic poster won't offer reasons why it's right to be gay. Instead, this of a poster is resorting to the "you don't know who you're messing with" classic. Give me something to talk about with you dumbass, you look like the here claiming I'm a bigot when I've repeatedly stated I'm tolerant to gay marriage (the holy grail of sexual desire).
Holy how old are you?
hmmm. Here's someone else who had problems with other people's choices...
sorry for the short ad...
Who's willing to bet backtobasic's next post directed to me will have an insult?
DD, where you at homey?
No you back peddled to being tolerant and no its not the holy grail. You're ignorance knows no bounds.
I don't even know what the point of your question is.
Right to be gay?
They exist, they're a fellow human being just like you and just like me. Its not about a right or law. Its existence, equality, plain and simple.
It has nothing to do with "you don't know who you're messing with" it has to do with "you don't know anything about me" and those lame backhanded infantile attempts to insult me based on nothing but your own stupidity.
Only a full blown moron would get called out for being a bigot only to respond by attempting to hurl infantile insults using the very subject he's been exposed as being intolerant of.
Congratulations on hanging yourself.
The mouth is also used as an exit orifice when needed. Believe me, I know.
Deflect much?
Right to be gay?
What exactly do you mean by that?
You're speaking as if they aren't human and are of an inferior race.
Plenty of gay in ”nature”
I didn't back peddle . I've always believed the right to wed whomever is a universal right to humans. And you couldn't possibly be certain that I'm wrong and you know what a sexual's greatest desire is...after all you're married and currently engaging in a heterosexual relation.
What's so right about being gay? Ethics aside, is being gay a natural thing supported by science?I don't even know what the point of your question is.
I agree that they're human, like me and you.They exist, they're a fellow human being just like you and just like me. Its not about a right or law. Its existence, equality, plain and simple.
but
Don't even try relying on the association between prior efforts and this gay advocacy effort. I believe the efforts to promote full equality for women and black people were right in the undertaking. In my opinion, being a women or a black person relates to that person's existence... Being a sexual relates to what a person engages and does in the course of his sexual desires.
LOLIt has nothing to do with "you don't know who you're messing with" it has to do with "you don't know anything about me" and those lame backhanded infantile attempts to insult me based on nothing but your own stupidity.
Moron? Intolerant? Stupidity?Only a full blown moron would get called out for being a bigot only to respond by attempting to hurl infantile insults using the very subject he's been exposed as being intolerant of.
The tone of your posts screamed of your advocacy and outright supremacy towards sexual relations.
Right to be gay as in why it's okay to be gay. I want backtobasics to outline and weigh the goods and bads to being gay but the dumbass keeps deflecting with posts.
Gays are human and Gay is not a race.
b2b top 10 list of the goods and bads of being gay???
you sir are re ed.
sure. I'm not sure what point you're making...
I mean from that stand point, everything is "natural".
You backpeddled. Everyone knows it.
Yes. Its also supported by common sense.
This isn't even a valid debatable point but an excuse to justify your bigoted intolerance.
This is nonsense. Your stupidity is based on what you posted in this thread.LOL
Moron? Intolerant? Stupidity?
The tone of your posts screamed of your advocacy and outright supremacy towards sexual relations.
Attempting to half ass make a conversation out of this thread is just another lame attempt to deflect from the real topic at hand. Your intolerance of gay people along with your superiority complex.
You're buried and there is no shoveling out. You've offended a ton of forum members by trying to be cute and funny. The best thing you can do at this point is apologize and go away until the dust settles.
Triggeredexcellence, are you a scientologist?
Was juts curious by that comment.What's so right about being gay? Ethics aside, is being gay a natural thing supported by science?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions