No no no, laws create reality, so if a law is passed so that only lower capacity magazines are available, the criminals automatically cannot have a higher capacity magazine because suddenly they never existed.
FACT: Only law abiding citizens will follow the law of "10 rd magazines only".
Criminals will still have their 33 rd Glock magazine or standard 19 rd full size magazine.
What good is that particular law then?
No no no, laws create reality, so if a law is passed so that only lower capacity magazines are available, the criminals automatically cannot have a higher capacity magazine because suddenly they never existed.
There's a lot of people I don't want with guns.
Why shouldn't a 15 year old have the same right to defend himself?
Btw, 12 people died in a helicopter crash today. Ban helicopters.
Are your arguments so weak that you must constantly resort to argument from absurdity to try to scrape up a win?
Age of accountability is an easy answer, one you should already know, but you're desperate.
Dude I was away..not here replying to you 24/7 ok?
Yeah no kidding.
But someone that works along those lines should at least have an understanding of the process.
Its like being a cop and not know how to handcuff someone.
There's a difference between having an understanding of the process and explaining to you why an inmate is on death row for 10 years before execution. Surely you know about appeals and all that.
It's not like being a cop and not knowing how to handcuff. It's like being a cop and not being able to explain the judge's decisions in traffic court.
It's not the job of a corrections officer to know or explain why a person on death row is there for so long, especially in a generic term.
I realize what you are doing (trolling) but you're on a dead end road here.
It tells me that when a lot of movies are made every year (especially in the summer), there's bound to be a scene in at least one that remind people of a tragedy, tbh.....
And for the "bombs are hard to make" Blake types here, the dudes apartment is booby trapped with bombs, so he could have used bombs in the theater as well but he wanted to live out his fantasy of being a villain and see it in their faces.
Outlaw the material needed to make bombs.
Sorry if someone has already posted this
http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/21/james-...ofile-website/
![]()
DMC is doing some serious work in here.![]()
DMC is by far the worst poster on this site.
jealous you can't regulate like the old man can.
Not really trolling, I was asking a serious question to someone who deals with immates and such.
Not high on lawyer talk either.
I have always being curious as to why someone who is clearly guilty is sent to death row for however many years instead of just getting things done.
I hear you on the appeals and whatnot but I'm talking about the 100% undeniably guilty ones who get sent there. Dont wait, just gas the .![]()
He ed up. He's in a death penalty state.
I've never heard the legal term "100% undeniably guilty". Even those who have confessed have later been found innocent.
I think it takes too long, but it's about due process. I would like to shoot them in the head at the trial after the verdict is read, and yes that would mean some innocents die eventually, but it would mean fewer innocents die and we save a ton of money.
Have to agree
My two cents is that if you really want to curb gun violence it won't be through hair-brained legislation like the Lautenberg (limiting mag size) nonsense, but rather by addressing the root social ills that lead to it; social inequality, poverty, drug crime, and the like. That would mean our politicians have to take a long term, level-headed approach... Something that's inherently lacking in our halls of government. I'm not holding my breath.
And as for preventing these mass-murder sprees, it's just not going to happen. We'll have episodes such as these as long as humans dwell on earth.
From the little I know about the process, I thinks it's primarily due to long and repeated appeals in the judiciary and bureaucratic maneuvering.
You can have all the laws in the world and pretty much make the US Nazi Germany but humans are too damn unpredictable an intelligent. There will always be violence against other humans and mass murders. People will find a way.
Imo people like James shouldn't be given the luxury of a lethal injection. Make this mother er burn and be tortured
i asked this question before, but this goofy grinning photo of the , is that from his arrest or from like a school ID photo?
because that Loughener also had a smirk on his face.
either way, we need to make the punishment so severe that heads won't be smirking once they're caught. I don't think a bullet to the head as DMC is good enough for some of these types, some need to be quartered or burned alive, none of this lethal injection bs.
Meh, I don't give a what they feel. Just get rid of them and move on. Sure you could flay them and leave them out in the sun to basically become human jerky, but there are just so many who need to die and so few minutes in the day.
IIRC the Norway shooter also smiled for his mug photo too
Some people just want to see the world burn, Mr. Wayne![]()
That pic is a college ID pic I think, that's why he is smiling
if a high school senior goes on a shooting spree in his high school, why are you only willing to say that adults should use guns?
Didn't you say a car can be a weapon? 15 year olds drive cars.
I'm just playing along the same line of reasoning you used to get to wanting to ban cars, helicopters and swimming pools.
lol assault pools
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)