Reply With Quote
It sure is cold up here in the hills.
you've got no clue about the way people in america feel about their guns and freedom. millions of people would step up to the plate, and half the army would defect as well as former military. yes it's THAT big a deal.
the 2nd amendment is what has allowed us to stay free and prosper. without guns, we're still under the british crown.
It sure is cold up here in the hills.
Chances of getting killed by a gun in the US:
4.5 in 100k
Shark attack odds: one in 11.5 million
Try again, bro.
So you agree that pysch evals should be needed for gun purchasing?
What if i want to sell a fully automatic to my neighbor? Who pays for the psych eval?
What other product requires a psych eval to buy?
That's why I carry a gun, not shark repellant.
i've already beaten your argument, it's quite simple.
it's already legal to purchase a fully automatic rifle. and our founding fathers intended us to have weapons equal to what the military has. the 2nd amendment served a dual purpose, one of which was a deterrent against tyranny. in fact, not allowing us to purchase fully automatic weapons goes against the 2nd amendment.
"the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed"
our right to bear arms shall not be infringed. in any way. that doesn't mean pick and choose which arms you can infringe upon and which ones you can't. they're all ours per our cons utional rights. whenever the revolver was invented, they didn't ban it on the grounds that it could do more damage than a single shooter. same thing with a fully auto, which is just an improvement upon the semi auto.
You cannot sell a fully automatic to your neighbor legally. You have to get a FFL Class 3 dealer to transfer the weapon, and forms have to be filed and background checks done and your local asshole has to sign off on it.So you agree that pysch evals should be needed for gun purchasing?
What if i want to sell a fully automatic to my neighbor? Who pays for the psych eval?
What other product requires a psych eval to buy?
As I said, you exposed that youre not as dumb as you actually PRETEND to be.It sure is cold up here in the hills.
You understand the automatic weapons "ban", you just pretend not to.
You understand why semi-automatics assault rifles are too dangerous, you just PRETEND not to. You actually equated them to swimming pools. But I know youre not THAT dumb.
You just love your guns A LOT. Thats all.
I do know how people feel about their guns in this country.
You act like things haven't changed since the 17th century. I don't think people revolting and starting a war against the American government and military is realistic.
find the odds on a mass shooting as i listed head...
Btw, a Gatling gun isn't a fully automatic weapon. It doesn't require any special permits, but you better have a load of money if you want one.
it would be unlawful for the military to be used against the people per our cons ution and would open up grounds for intervention by the international community, for one.
for 2, most of our military are good people and would not fire upon those they are sworn to protect and serve. in order for there to be a revolution, there would have to be a damn good reason. one that any true american would agree upon, and half of the military would be on our side. just like the way the military split and broke off in syria right now in their civil war. you realize it's basically army defectors vs the army right? and the defectors are raising right now. they just recently killed some of his closest advisors and rumored to have injured the man himself in the attack. don't underestimate the willpower of a united people.
Only mass shooting "count" when it comes to dying via a gun!
You find the odds, " head". It was YOUR stupid claim.
I wish I could say the same about you.
You don't, you just make up and do Google searches to try to keep up.You understand the automatic weapons "ban", you just pretend not to.
There's no such as a semi-automatic assault rifle. An assault rifle is an automatic rifle that uses an intermediate cartridge and a detachable magazine.You understand why semi-automatics assault rifles are too dangerous, you just PRETEND not to. You actually equated them to swimming pools. But I know youre not THAT dumb.
More ignorant ass CNN speak by an ignorant ass liberal pencil pushing paper turned keyboard commando.
The rest of your gibberish is just that.
I happen to understand cause and effect, and your hyperbolic argument has been reduced to arguing about my motive instead of arguing facts. It doesn't ing matter what I think ought to happen, facts exist and I've educated you on them and you're now much less of an ignorant asshole than you were, but still as much of an asshole.You just love your guns A LOT. Thats all.
btw "Heath Ledger" - Please provide me another product or service that requires a "psych eval" before purchase since that was YOUR solution to allowing fully automatic weapons.
There are a few different schools of thought (loosely using that term here).
1. Ban guns, they's evil and I don't understand them
2. Ban some guns, they's evil and I don't understand them
3. Ban some evil features of guns because evil features are evil and I don't understand them
4. Who needs evil guns? I don't understand them
5. Require stupid, invasion of privacy in order to allow people to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights.
6. mmmm guns
Didnt need a google search bro. YOUR wikipedia link provided all the information I needed on the Hyde amendment. Talk about self-ownage!
You wanted to PRETEND that fully automatic weapons were just as legal as semi-automatic weapons. In fact, fully automatics are extremely rare and expensive since theyve been banned from manufacturer distribution since the mid-80s!
Again, youre not THAT dumb. You just pretend to be because you REALLY like your guns!
Youve thrown every ad-hominem attack at me. Youve accused me of being a liberal (Im not), never having fired a weapon (I have), being a Suns fan (dont know how thats relevant but whatever) because you realized that acknowledging that some weapons are more dangerous than others totally sup your whole argument.
1. Do you think cops should have guns? Why?
2. Do you think cops should have fully automatic rifles? Why?
3. Do you think cops should have nuclear weapons? Why?
1. Yes. Because guns are an extremely effective tool for killing people which cops sometimes have to do.
2. Fully automatic? No. Cant think of a reason why. Cant think of a real world situation where cops need that kind of fire power.
3. No. Again, cops dont need that type of destructive capability.
Why do cops sometimes have to kill people?
So killing someone with a fully automatic weapon is worse
Baltimore firm develops automatic rifle for military, SWAT
Adcor Industries competing with major gunmakers for Army contract to replace M4 carbine
What's the difference between a gun and a nuke?
Also, if the cops faced a situation where "fully automatics" were necessary, they would probably call in the national guard (individuals better trained with those weapons and types of scenarios).
Cops dont neeed em.
THIS is why youre an idiot. This is what I mean by "pretending to be dumb".
Youre not THAT dumb, why do you pretend to be?
Why would the military need them?
I need you to answer. What is the difference between using a gun and using a nuke? Both kill people. Both are designed to kill people. Both have no other purpose.
Do you think a person should be able to walk into Walmart and buy a nuke?
Ok forget the nuke, should they be able to buy a laser guided bomb?
Forget that too, how about a hand grenade?
No?
Firecrackers?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions