Reply With Quote
You should have just admitted the film was boring rather than try to spin with how many "stories tall" the MONORAIL system was.
You're right.
20 stories might have been an understatement. Looks pretty tall to me.
Im confident 90% wont have a clue about the "20 story" monorail or who the "Rhaul la garab" or whoever was.
You should have just admitted the film was boring rather than try to spin with how many "stories tall" the MONORAIL system was.
You're right.
20 stories might have been an understatement. Looks pretty tall to me.
Absolutely meaningless. Are you going to survey the general public about the ending? No.
sup bro
You're right.
20 stories might have been an understatement. Looks pretty tall to me.
I'd like to give you a stinky pinky if your down. Just don't forget the mayonnaise
Regardless, you are the one who talked yourself into such a hole.
You are the one talking about how ty the movies are, then proceed to say Spiderman trilogy > Batman trilogy by posting ratings from Rotten Tomatoes, only for those exact ratings to say Batman > Spiderman, and then in addition to that, the lowest score of any of them was 85%, for Batman Begins, which is actually a very good score for Rotten Tomatoes, so in the end, you pretty much just gave high props to the Batman movies through your "facts" that you pulled up.
ing moron.
I dont have to. Stretch just proved my point with his description of the ending.
How did Terminator end? Sarrah Connor smashed the terminator in the elevator.
How did "The Last crusade end"? Indiana Jones chose the cup of christ and saved his father.
How did "Empire Strikes back" end? Darth Vader revealed to Luke that he was his father.
How did " The Dark Knight end?"....um...no clue. Did the joker die? Who knows. Did Harvey dent die? Who cares?
Try again! Tell me how the Dark Knight ended!
I didnt say Spiderman was better than Batman. When did I say that?
Please quote where i said that or admit that youre a ing idiot!
all of these sound boring as
He didn't prove your point. You thought the ending was boring anyway.
In the Favorite Trilogy thread, we have this...I didnt say Spiderman was better than Batman. When did I say that?
Please quote where i said that or admit that youre a ing idiot!
So when you replied to RedZero's post by posting RT ratings, what exactly was your goal? To prove that Batman > Spiderman?
And my point was that the first two spiderman films were just as well received and made just as money as the first two batman films. The third one was a let down, but they could make just as good a case about "best trilogy" as Nolanites can for "TDK".
Maybe even better considering Raimi didnt make Spiderman a ing idiot and the subject of endless parody videos the way Nolan did with Batman.
Way to talk yourself in circles once again, when you just a few posts ago stated how you told your co-worker that the Joker did not die, yet here you try to claim you don't know.
Couldnt find the quote, huh!In the Favorite Trilogy thread, we have this...
So when you replied to RedZero's post by posting RT ratings, what exactly was your goal? To prove that Batman > Spiderman?
Now admit youre a ing idiot!
Right.
Is that why everyone that saw the trilogy has a lasting image of Peter Parker being an emo got, walking through town wearing black makeup and flipping his hair out of his eyes?
The ing idiot is the one who replies to a post that Batman > Spiderman in the eyes of the general public, then posts ratings that are supposed to be the best indicator of the general public's opnion, only to back up his point that Batman > Spiderman in the eyes of the general public.Couldnt find the quote, huh!
Now admit youre a ing idiot!
Spider-Man - 7.4
Spider-Man 2 - 7.5
Spider-Man 3 - 6.3
Batman Begins - 8.3
The Dark Knight - 8.9
The Dark Knight Rises - 9.1
I can use ratings from movie websites, too.
I read a lot about the possibility of Joker having a cameo in the third one, implying that he must have lived. I also saw a cartoon in THIS THREAD showing a "deleted" scene of joker being released form prison.Way to talk yourself in circles once again, when you just a few posts ago stated how you told your co-worker that the Joker did not die, yet here you try to claim you don't know.
I dont remember how the joker "lived" or "died".
ROFL okay
So you then admit that the RT rating of Batman is a solid indicator of the film's overall perception, and that your opinion isn't as widely held as you try to suggest it is?
Didnt say that though, did I?
I posted those scores to show how comparable they were to each other.
The first spiderman did better than the first batman. The second respective films had nearly identical ratings (94 to 93).
The third batman did better than the third spiderman, but my point that spiderman fans could make just as good a case for "Best trilogy" as batman films is valid. Both trilogies were well received by critics and were box office successes.
Nolanites get upset at that idea because.....theyre total s.
Seriously...tell me how the dark knight ended.
Remember: Try not to make it boring!
be sure to include how the joker lived/died
Here's a scenario:Didnt say that though, did I?
I posted those scores to show how comparable they were to each other.
The first spiderman did better than the first batman. The second respective films had nearly identical ratings (94 to 93).
The third batman did better than the third spiderman, but my point that spiderman fans could make just as good a case for "Best trilogy" as batman films is valid. Both trilogies were well received by critics and were box office successes.
Nolanites get upset at that idea because.....theyre total s.
10 people watched Movie A and thought it was merely decent.
10 people watched Movie B. 9 loved it and one didn't like it.
Would it be true to say that Movie A was better received?
Personally, I loved the Batman movies before even knowing who Christopher Nolan was. I didn't know who he was until after seeing Inception. Then I went back and saw Insomnia and Memento, both of which are very good films BTW.Didnt say that though, did I?
I posted those scores to show how comparable they were to each other.
The first spiderman did better than the first batman. The second respective films had nearly identical ratings (94 to 93).
The third batman did better than the third spiderman, but my point that spiderman fans could make just as good a case for "Best trilogy" as batman films is valid. Both trilogies were well received by critics and were box office successes.
Nolanites get upset at that idea because.....theyre total s.
Some of me wonders whether you really view these movies as being as ty as you suggest, or you just don't like fanboys, and bull half the time just to argue with fanboys, much like people do with Kobe fanboys, and try to say "Kobe sucks, I'd rather have Tony Parker or Monta Ellis", or "Kobe isn't even a top 30 player of all time", when they know that they are completely full of . Sounds more like your issue is with fanboys than anything, which is understandable... but doesn't justify your complete ing re ation, nor the fact that you are a king at talking yourself in circles, getting cornered, then trying to resort to either lies or weak-sauce insults like grammar smack.
Or, simply put... you are a got.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
