Reply With Quote
That depends on being on the ticket, Obama winning, and the economy turning around.
You say that as if it's a positive.
I think the point is, Obama hasn't done anything that's POSITIVE.
You're right, Obamacare was quite a feat. What with the Cornhusker Kickback and the Louisiana Purchase, and a fraudulent election in Minnesota thrown in, to boot; he was able to lie, cheat, and steal that piece of legislation across the finish line.
Quite an accomplishment.
a) It steals $716 billion from Medicare, and;
b) It's gone from the CBO scoring at a $450 billion dollar surplus to a $1.5 trillion drain on the economy, over the next 10 years.
c) You can't keep your doctor and you can't keep your insurance.
That depends on being on the ticket, Obama winning, and the economy turning around.
You say that as if it's a positive.
If by most you mean the opposite then its true.
How do you figure the guy ahead in pretty much every metric is desperate?
First two I looked at,Ramaussen and gallop have Romney up. I think our clown, clambake migh be right about fox. God bless
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...bama-1171.html
desperate and most
Looks like dumb Joe doesn't matter. well, snap.
LOL so you look at 2 and think thats most? Some outstanding analysis there.
Brother, math is not your strength. I even mentioned the fox poll in that same post. That's 3 for sures. FYI, I looked at more. God bless
The guy who doesn't know what most means is telling me math is not my strength?
Who's up in most polls again?
Are you counting the D+19 polls?
Jeezus Yoni...although I wouldn't call either leading by a significant margin, Obama is still coming out slightly on top in a lot of polls...but as we all know, polls can be skewed by the organization doing the poll.
I don't know what you mean by D+19.
I used a site that is run by GOP people and their national polls aren't even close. The only 2 Romney is winning aren't even out of the MOE. No serious poll monitor thinks Romney is winning this race. Thats why the two sites I follow such as 538 have Obama as a clear favorite to win so far. He's winning the national polls and he's winning when you look at state polls one by one.
You can ignore the polls if you want, but to try to make them seem favorable to Romney is laughable. I remember you not willing to bet on the race in 2008 that you were so sure the polls were wrong in predicting, Yoni. I doubt you're willing to put anything behind your declarations this time around.
Yup, which is why Rasmussen always leans right. FWIW, Rasmussen also had Obama behind much of the time in 08. I don't think that turned out right.
Well, for now...
White House says Obama will stick with Biden as running mate
Of course, David Axelrod went on MSNBC before hand and reaffirmed his confidence in Slow Joe.
Axelrod Won't Rule Out Biden Being Dropped, Tells Joke Instead
There's a lot of past tense in that paragraph."Listen, I have a great affection and respect for Joe Biden," Axelrod said, according to a rush transcript. "I think he's been a great vice president. He's taken on a lot of tough assignments for our administration. ... from administering the recovery act -- and he did it very, very well -- through being the point person on the Iraq war and getting our troops home and doing that -- the politics of that over there. he's done a great job for us."
21 days.
Who's your pollster of choice, Manny?
I think Pew did a poll earlier this month or last where they oversampled Democrats by 19% in a swing state where, in 2010 and 2008, Democrats only showed up to the polls in numbers 4% greater than Republicans.
That's what I meant by D+19. There were other polls that did the same but, that was the most egregious.
I'm definitely not a defender of the complete fraud that is the Obama White House, but I do find it hilarious that Giuliani wasn't saying the same about dumb ass Bush..Did y'all see the clip of Rudy Giuliani talking about Biden?...
How soon we forget..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgPSh...eature=related
I don't have a pollster of choice. I prefer aggregates of all polls to get a better picture as opposed to a single sampling.
It may come as a shock, but when people refer to previous events they use the past tense. Amazing, isn't it?
So nothing going on with Joe? How about Mitt, is he switching to VP and handing Ryan the wheel?
How about what and how he is doing as Vice President?
Suggests his best days are behind him, imo.
Do you do the aggregating or is there a site?
And, if a bunch of biased polls were mixed in with your aggregate polling scheme, wouldn't that affect the outcome?
I actually think Hillary told them both to suck it, she's not cleaning up the mess Obama's made.
Agree. 538 has been pretty spot on the last few elections and is normally where I peek at polling.
Brother, I'm sticking with "most". It's you who counted two when atleast 3 were right in front of you. To display most of the polls would be a waste of my time, you already pulled the leaning right card out of your blue bag. God bless
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
