The doctors coming out with these pro cir cision studies obviously have a dog in this fight, as people now have access to all kinds of information on the internet and are suing for what was done with them. The perpetrators have to maintain the facade that there are very minimal health benefits so that they can evade lawsuits via this technicality. They also make billions of dollars per year performing the surgeries and then selling the stolen body parts to big business.
They say it slightly lowers your chance of penile cancer..okay that's one of the most rare forms of cancer there is and only affects 1 in 100,000.
They say it slightly lowers your chance of HIV IF YOU ARE HAVING UNPROTECTED SEX. Cool..but do you see any of these doctors going to Africa and having unprotected sex if they are so confident? The truth is, only abstinence or condoms prevent STD's.
There's also the little problem that uncir cised Europe has LESS std's than the US, and no problems with the big bad infections they fear monger us to death with. It doesn't really add up that cir cision is so great if uncir cised europe is better off without it.
If you do your research and dig deeper into the subject, you learn that cir cision was always a cure in search of a disease. No other procedure in history has been said to "cure" more ailments than cir cision. They said it cured blindness, insanity, and all sorts of ridiculous things. There is something deeper there at work at a psychological level. Some say it's a form of control.