As if Chump-Gate wasn't enough ownage of Chumpy, Dan slaughters him yet again. Not a good week for Chump at all
lol paint chips
lol Chump-Gate: The 9/11 post count story continues..
I suggest you look at what other chemicals need to be found to say it was termite, before you claim victory for your side.
As if Chump-Gate wasn't enough ownage of Chumpy, Dan slaughters him yet again. Not a good week for Chump at all
lol paint chips
lol Chump-Gate: The 9/11 post count story continues..
As much as I hate to say this, Chump is right. You have any idea how much it pains me to say that?
I did.
blow your load already chumpy and quite ing around if you got evidence that all these physicists and chemical engineers are wrong prove it...
They didn't do the tests Millette did.
What's the matter, dan? I thought all truthers wanted was an independent investigation. Well, you got one here and now that the results didn't confirm your bias, you're melting down.
Tell me what you think Millette did wrong. I already told you what I thought the band of biased conspiracy theorists did wrong.
Yes really. There is aluminum in the kaolin that's in the paint, but that's not the same thing as the elemental Al you need for super-duper-melting-yet-also-explosive nanothermite.
Paint chips, dude.
Paint chips.
Right.
ZOMG! Microspheres!
I guess dan is going to say the manufacturer of Brillo pads is in on 9/11 now.
I'm sorry, you're going to have to tell everyone your theory about where these explosives were planted, how they were made to explode when and where they did and why they didn't make any noise right before the collapses of the tower like any other controlled demolition explosion ever in the history of the world.So now the question is not if an explosive method was used, but which one?
First things first.
EDIT: Oh, I'm sorry.
It's unfair of me to ask you what you think really happened on 9/11.
You are entirely incapable of coming up with a theory and even if you could you would never have the courage to commit it to your legacy on the internets or open it to the slightest scrutiny.
lol post count
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 09-20-2012 at 04:19 AM.
It's true Chump took a beating in this topic but he is still hanging in there and has brought up some major points that need to be addressed.
OK, let's go over some of the things the scientists who prepared that paper have said:
Niels Harrit: I personally am certain that conventional explosives were used too, in abundance.
RT []: When you say “in abundance,” how much do you mean?
Niels Harrit: Tons! Hundreds of tons! Many, many, many tons!
http://rt.com/usa/news/did-nano-ther...wtc/?fullstory
Do you agree with this scientist's statement that hundreds of tons of explosives were used in NYC, dan?
Steven Jones: Another one that you might never have thought of, that I will be addressing this next little while is Haiti. Now Haiti you wouldn't think of as a generated crisis. But did you know that tremendous oil reserves have been found in the bay, in that area right around Port-au-Prince. Tremendous oil reserves reported in 2008 to be larger than the oil reserves of Venezuela, which is one of the largest oil producers in the world. So again is this a "natural" or "real" crisis or is it one of Biden's generated crises?
http://vimeo.com/9609513
Do you agree with that scientist that the earthquake in Haiti could have been caused by the United States in order to get oil, dan?
Steven Jones: Sofia got me looking at chemtrails for example. And I'm not ready to talk about that too much, I have actually made some observations. I have not (unintelligible) what's in those trails, but some of those do certainly last longer than others. And that's... I could go into that a little bit, but I think that that's a valid area and it's not 9/11 but it is truth.
http://mp3.wtprn.com/Barrett/0805/20...e_Barrett2.mp3
Do you agree with this scientist about contrails, dan?
Steven Jones: Thus, the marked hand symbol is connected to Deity-in particular with Itzamna, who died, went to the world of spirits and then was resurrected. All of this is reminiscent of Jesus Christ, supporting the claim of the Book of Mormon that New World inhabitants knew of Jesus long before Columbus arrived. There is much additional evidence, and the interested reader is pointed to reference.
The hypothesis that started my search, that Christ's "other sheep" would have artwork depicting deliberately marked hands, has led to a remarkable conclusion: Hands (and wrists) with clear holes or marks are depicted in the art as well as the hieroglyphic writings of the Maya of Middle America, dating from within about 200 years of the time of Christ. These hands are associated with Itzamna, a kindly Deity associated with healing and teaching the people. He is shown dying in Mayan art, later to be resurrected. Finally, the Maya await the return of this great resurrected Deity in the not-distant future.
These discoveries have provided me a deeper appreciation for the reality of the resurrection of Jesus and of His visit to "other sheep" who heard His voice and saw His wounded hands as did Thomas. My hope is that these new insights will encourage you to seriously consider the Book of Mormon, Another Testament of Christ. Why don't you start reading right away? The Apostle Paul said: "Prove all things. Hold fast that which is good." (I Thessalonians 5:21) Why not? I've done this and for me, the Book of Mormon is a remarkable new witness for Christ, standing as a companion to the Bible.
http://web.archive.org/web/200511240...nd+figures.htm
So dan, do you agree with this scientist that Jesus visited Central America on his way to heaven?
Same goes to you, SA210. You want to put your faith in dan and these men because you have an e-grudge against me. You might want to reconsider.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 09-20-2012 at 06:25 AM. Reason: added link for earthquake machine video
lol SA10 and his pathological inability to be incorrect. Must've picked that up from his hero, nbadan.
When will the truthers get it through their heads that nobody is going to watch their ing 2-hour videos, full of hasty conjectures from blurry, grainy recordings and junk science? Hiding behind long-ass videos that you all KNOW no normal person will ever watch instead of clearly explaining your theories in laymans' terms just shows that you've got nothing....
The best part is when they start feeling cornered and vomit out a whole new four hours of video they demand you watch.
Your an idiot...you would rather take the word of a guy like Chumpy than the hours of testimony from chemical. electrical and mechanical engineers, demolition experts, physicists, architects, pilots....
Yeah, I remember the last good point you made, let's see...
Oh, no I don't...
Typical deflection technique by Chumpy....attack the messenger when you've lost the battle of the message..
So commie news is alright to use here after all.
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or unrelated belief of the person supporting it.[1] Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as a logical fallacy,[2][3][4] more precisely an informal fallacy and an irrelevance.[5]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Just sad, very sad...
Direct quotes from it?So commie news is alright to use here after all.
Absolutely.
And you didn't answer the question.
Countering your fallacious appeal to authority fallacy. Steven Jones is neither an expert in this field nor does his non-theory enjoy anything approaching a consensus in the scientific community.
Which was just sad.
What else could I do? You never answer anything regarding the evidence or anything you believe really happened on 9/11.
Ever.
Look, I'll give you an example directly related to this thread. You spent all this time pimping a study that claims to have found nanothermite in WTC dust. Given that -- do you, Nbadan, believe that nanothermite was used to demolish the World Trade Center towers.
Yes or no.
I breathlessly await your squirming non-answer.
If you've ever worked a flightline or jocked a jet you know that's a typical day.
lol thinking the Bush admin was smart enough to pull that off but couldn't plant WMDs in Iraq.
Hey genius...that's the other thread
Who's squirming? I'm not absolutely sure mostly because I hate absolutes, but I think it is certainly possible that some type of nano-thermatic dust could have been used to bring down the WTC towers...unlike you, I'm not ready to rule it out....Look, I'll give you an example directly related to this thread. You spent all this time pimping a study that claims to have found nanothermite in WTC dust. Given that -- do you, Nbadan, believe that nanothermite was used to demolish the World Trade Center towers.
Yes or no.
I breathlessly await your squirming non-answer.
What do you think most likely brought the towers down at this point?
10,000 youtubes.
We do know it wasn't Gravity or fire.
If you believe that, then what do you believe it was?
I cant think of anything more painful.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
