Reply With Quote
I did more research than you on this subject.
Do you still contend that scientists don't provide an explanation for how elements form?
I try not to debate posters who have to insult you with outdated put downs instead of doing some research
I did more research than you on this subject.
Do you still contend that scientists don't provide an explanation for how elements form?
In fact this whole "element" talk is steering us off track I have many other examples that disprove Darwin and the misguided scientist.
But I will address all element questions by Sunday morning when I am back in San Antonio were I keep most of my data.
Something for you Darwin followers to think about....,
Evolution is not taught in every country not everyone on the planet shares your outrageous claims.
Maybe I was misunderstood....science may have an eplaination it's just not 100% fact it's speculation at best.
You weren't. You made a stupid claim, and now you are just backpeddling.
How did you come to this conclusion?science may have an eplaination it's just not 100% fact it's speculation at best.
I just saw your made for tv YouTube video
The way they just say Millions of years ago a star exploded and produced carbon and then we had oxygen talk about speculating.
The funny part of all this it only proves my point scientist claim all elements are from helium and nitrogen that was the point I made from the start.
I can't bilieve how gullible you guys are they can say cholate was formed by a large star exploding and you never question?
How did the star get there in the first place?
How did helium and nitrogen just appear out of nowhere ?
I'm sure you have another made for tv YouTube link with relaxing music.
You are going all over the place right now.
Are you saying that the explanation that was given about how elements form is wrong? Yes or no?
And if scientists don't know how elements are formed, how were they able to discover synthetic elements?
Last edited by redzero; 09-27-2012 at 09:56 PM.
What part of me talking further about elements and the fairytail scentist want to feed us on Sunday when I am back home in San Antonio did you not get?
When I produce to you the diffrent BS science has been saying and retracting over the years about this subject your going to feel very embarrassed.
That is the question I first asked.
I like how red zeros YouTube link describes oxygen all of a sudden appearing after carbon they sneak that in there so all the other elements fall into place when the truth is they are just speculating truth is scientist only know about 5% of the universe and didn't know about black matter until 30 years ago they say they have no idea how the universe works each one of them just feed off the bull the scientists said before.
You're rambling right now.
What, exactly, is your problem with the scientific explanation for how elements form? Be specific, please.
rofl I wonder what got mouse so pissed off about science for him to ramble like this.
The branches of physics and mathmatics that form the basis of this "speculation" take years to learn.I just saw your made for tv YouTube video
The way they just say Millions of years ago a star exploded and produced carbon and then we had oxygen talk about speculating.
The funny part of all this it only proves my point scientist claim all elements are from helium and nitrogen that was the point I made from the start.
I can't bilieve how gullible you guys are they can say cholate was formed by a large star exploding and you never question?
How did the star get there in the first place?
How did helium and nitrogen just appear out of nowhere ?
I'm sure you have another made for tv YouTube link with relaxing music.
It ceases being "speculation when it becomes mathmatically proven, and the theories and implications are borne out in reproducible experiments, and astronomical observations.
You are too ignorant to even know how ignorant you are on this.
"elements evolve"
You start off with things you don't know, gather data, and figure it out. Not every theory is going to be right the first time, and the theories get better as time goes by, simply because we build on what went before, and use experiments to confirm or falsify hypotheses.
Simply because you can't understand the video doesn't make it wrong. The onlything you have proven, yet again, is that you are incapable of understanding it.
"elements evolve"
Have you ever googled your chart?The branches of physics and mathmatics that form the basis of this "speculation" take years to learn.
It ceases being "speculation when it becomes mathmatically proven, and the theories and implications are borne out in reproducible experiments, and astronomical observations.
You are too ignorant to even know how ignorant you are on this.
Many people disagree with the cookie cutter outcome you find in the text books.
Also I never said elements evoulve I said if the universe only had hydrogen and heilum then according to Darwin everything evoulved from the big bang so go back and read the orange and pear senario.
Again, mouse, what is your complaint about the scientific explanations for how elements form?
I know that you are at a loss for words right now, since you don't have a creationist website to copy and paste from, so I'll wait.
Last edited by redzero; 09-28-2012 at 01:44 AM.
No but he has a pretty facebook page.
i won't lie the chemistry part of Evolution debating is my weakest field but I can guarantee you that wont really make a difference in the outcome when i present my findings. And many of you will run and hide.
thinking that copying and pasting things made by creationist makes you strong in any field.
And I'm not even talking about evolution. I am asking about elements.
Why won't you just elaborate on why you find the scientific explanation of how elements form, so ridiculous?
I don't normally reply to a bored TRoll who really doesn't want to debate properly or learn a thing or two but in the spirit of the silent majority
Who read these topics and choose to not reply due to the immature redicle they will surely experience by doing so.
I will say this.
It doesn't matter where the information comes from if it's information that adds to the topic at hand. If we are debating about slavery and you go to a kkk wedsite to borrow a photo of a black man hanging from a tree does that make you a racist or a supporter of the kkk?
Why do you give a rats ass where any
Photos or quotes come from just add to
The topic or do us a favor read more and post less.
Now with that said I am not done posting all my data on elements and the BS about the bigbang yet.
But even if I was to say ok you win I was wrong about the elements....
That still wouldn't count for the other 98% of the facts I posted you and your wannabe science buddies have no answer for.
So I still feel quite sastified I am winning this debate will continue to do so no matter how many immature TRolls I encounter along the way.
Yes.
The "Ok for Evo poster(s) to copy and paste but not for intelligent creation poster(s)" is....
Yes makes you wonder if its just Mul roll going for more *hits*.
It's called double standards.
When science screws up they say "that's the beauty of science we are constanly revising constanly changing as we explore further"
Anyone else makes a mistakes they are ing liers and need to shut the up!
Someone finds out Jesus had a wife it's " I told you the bible was a bunch of bull "
Someone else finds out the earth is really 12 billion years old instead of 50 billion years old and it's "oh cool! Science is doing it's job finding out new things"
Science is the James Bond of bull they have liscence to lie.
So, if a scientist gets something wrong, it's because they are lying? It can't be because they made a mistake? Every single mistake is a lie, mouse?
And thank you for admitting that you don't know what you are talking about, in regards to elements. Without your creationist websites that you plagiarize, you can't actually come up with your arguments.
Do you plagiarize on any of your evo posts?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
