Iraq LOL
Attack of the strawmen!
![]()
Why did it take the Bush adminstration three full years and thousands of dead soldiers before they undertook a review of their strategy?
Why did they not have a winning strategy in place before they invaded Iraq?
Since we are asking whys, maybe you can amuse us all by attempting to defend the indefensible.
Iraq LOL
Attack of the strawmen!
![]()
cc outraged over 4 deaths
cc quiet when 4000+ die
lol
it is quiet funny..
if you a war that was initiated from falsehoods and outright lies..you have zero credibility from ever criticizing anyone else about the same thing..
It's like you're talking to a wall... or a 5 yr old with his hands over his ears.. lol
Lot's of silence ever since team blue took over, tbh.
It's impressive to see a man feeding off his emotions, brother.
Brother, the last time an ambassador from the USA was murder was under Carter. It sure has been silent for a long time. God bless
I think most blue teamers, myself included, will reserve the right to wait before we claim the Administration lied about the raid until all of the information is reviewed........................... novel concept for the red teamers but hey let's try and make it a scandal!
That would be more effective if you understood what a strawman logical fallacy was. My assertion was not a strawman.
I will ask again, did you, or Yonivore start threads about the lack of armor, ask a lot of why questions, and have outrage about like this:
Ryan Kelley survived that, albeit minus a limb or two.
How many didn't?
Do you have any outrage about this?
You want to piss and moan about a failure that killed 4 people, and I have a distinct memory of Republicans lining up to defend policies and an administration whose incompetence arguably cost a lot more.
Show me a thread you started about this failure, and I will take your outrage alot more seriously.
Now you are acting rational. Brother, please for your own good admit you are a far left wing democrat and "darn proud of it". God bless
nope no outrage from the red teamersSPC. THOMAS WILSON: We're digging pieces of rusted scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass that has already been shot up, dropped, busted-- picking the best out of this scrap to put on our vehicles go into combat.
We do not have proper armament vehicles to carry with us North.
DONALD RUMSFELD: As you know, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time.
You can have all the armor in the world on a tank, and a tank can be blown up. And you can have an up-armored Humvee, and it can be blown up.
Obama had more thoughts on the Cambridge police for going to the Harvard professors house then he has on an USA Ambassador being murdered. God bless
The assymetrical war of IEDS in Iraq was perfectly predictable. , Cheney predicted it in the 1990's when he was Defense secretary defending the first Bush's decision not to depose Saddam. I was in intel during the break up of Yugoslavia after its strongman police state was removed. Iraq had a lot of eerie parallels.
If you go into a war, and put our soldiers in harms way, just as the Obama administration owes a debt to the embassy people to take care of them, you owe your troops decent, realistic planning, and the right equipment for the fight you know you are going to get into.
The fact that none of you red teamers are calling for an investigation into who knew what and how for the ed Iraq occupation planning says all I need to know about how genuine you are.
Investigating a war <> investigation of an attack on an embassy, tbh.
It was only 4 people? Oh, nevermind then.
Go yourself. I have said repeatedly we shouldn't be over there.
Wait a cotton picking second here!!!! You did it, brother!!!! I'm so proud of you. This is the first time you admitted you're a democrat!! I'm very, very proud of you!!!! I'm sorry I missed it before. My prayer was answered. God bless
There's a narrative at work here whether RG can admit it or not.
RG, you know I think highly of you, but this post, and pretty much every post you've made in this thread just screams, "YOUR TEAM DID THIS TOO, SO IT'S OK IF WE DO TOO"!!!!!!
And really loud too.
, if you have GGA on board the way he's jumped into the mix, you know the partisan politics angle is strong in here. That dude has never disagreed with a Democrats decision....EVER.
it is the lesser of two evils
they could have beefed up security.
it would just be more dead.
....bad guys.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)