0-5
Pretty impressed with Tech. Did not see their good start lasting very long, but I was wrong.
solid win. should beat the sips and then get 1 of 2 between k-state and the frogs
Maybe the frogs, but I think K-state runs the table.
I was pretty shocked seeing that score on my phone while i was checking to see if OU had hit 60 yet
sons did y'all see that huge photographer?
Looked like he pushed him over. He should have at least tried to politic for a call.
well now we see west virginia sucks, tcu is just okay and tech's win over these two maybe top 35 teams was not an indicator of tech's program at all. see k-state and oklahoma for a better evaluation of red raiders worth. they will probably beat texas however.
assessing college football is not your forte
you're right. i gave way too much credit to west virginia and tcu. then i gave way too much credit to tech. but hindsight proves invaluable once again. tech is slightly above average in a slightly above average conference.
Would you give this too much credit?
![]()
I know I'm right.
Big 12-2 is #1 in the computers/#3 in the AP.tech is slightly above average in a slightly above average conference.
http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/b...sinfo&id=54824
got any more neat assessments?
it's mildly amusing. cliche and not very original but worth a chuckle i guess.
thanks to k-state and oklahoma, both of who made tech look like a jv team. got mad props for their talent.
by the end of the year (before the bowl games), both texas and oklahoma state will be out of the top 25. tech could very well lose to okie state. too bad a computer doesn't have an algorithm that takes into account how overrated texas is.
Right, top 2-3 conference thanks to KSU and OU.
Mad props go to Bill Snyder.
He was genius enough his first go round. His pulling them back up this high this fast is nothing short of super genius.
ut dropping 66 on a mid level SEC team this year threw a wrench in the algorithm
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)