It's not a reputation, it's the truth, and if anybody brought up the "winning team" argument they were wrong. This being said, there's a difference between passive (or more specifically: not looking to shoot) and uninterested (which Diaw was in Charlotte because the team sucked).
All in all I don't see the point of piling on on Diaw when so far he's been a clear positive for the Spurs, be it at the end of last season (when his integration into the system was very smooth) and this year (where his passing and IQ have already been very useful).
Splitter is another problem entirely. I'd say part of his struggles are due to Pop's doing his utmost to put him in unfavorable situations, limiting his minutes for god knows what reason and so on; but the other part is that he is just WAY too soft to be a difference maker in the NBA, and his ceiling is sadly a lot lower than we expected and hoped for. Unlike many other Spurs prospects who got the boot before getting the opportunity to prove themselves, Splitter has had many opportunities now, and at his age and experience he's extremely unlikely to morph into the kind of player the Spurs really need. Of course on a team that desperate with bigs that Bonner is a rotation player, he's still better than nothing. At this point I wouldn't mind seeing him traded, except we don't need a lateral move but an upgrade, and I can't see who the trade kicker could be in order for another team to send us a better version of Splitter.

Reply With Quote
"
poor tlong
