Gordon's the worst due to total lack of production (not even playing)
It's a toss up between the other 3 tbh. You'd have to measure production to cash ratio, so even though JJ is possbily the best player of the other 3, he costs a ton (33% more than Boozer, 100% more the Gallo). Boozer is better than Gallinari, but costs 50% more. Just comes down to preference then.
But if I had to pick, I'd put JJ as the worst due to 80m owed, then Gallo, then Boozer. At least Boozer's deal is almost up and he's still good on offense (and not as bad as blamed for on D'). Next season he should be tradable, and the offseason and season after that he's easily moveable for a solid piece. The other guys you're just having to choke on the salary for a longer period of time and getting crap production.
It appears I did waste my time, since you're a worthless poster with no intentions of talking about basketball on a basketball forum. Instead, you, like many others here, will just call people " gots" who make better posts than you 100% of the time since you never have a legit point to make about anything. Might's well just call people gots since you can't post anything relevant, amiright?
Go back to your minimum wage job of greeting people at Wal Mart, imbecile.
You guys are a bunch of mamma's boys who always have takes. Your opinions about other posters are completely worthless.
Gallo makes just a bit more than Bonner. Figure that one out.
Bonner 3mm
Right. I'd take 1 Gallo over 3 Bonners.
kidd K ain't too bad by s' standard tbh, it never bothers him to make up a wall of words in almost every post of his and he deserves an A+ for such effort at least, and that also explains why a bag like him has only barely exceeded the 1k mark imho. moreover he also delivers us some big words every now and then, just like how he delivers smiles to his customers at wal-mart.
but how could you know he's a ? his unique usages of the words and some funny spelling errors tell you all... stoudAmireain't it like how most s pronounce amare's name? and im puzzled as to how you have a toss-up between 3 scenarios
Good question, tbh.
I really think Joe Johnson has to be on the top of the list.
-Gordon has always been overrated but if the Hornets let him walk, it's not like they had similar talent ready to go to that city. He'll probably play again at some point and be able to add some value over the years.
-Boozer is what he is. Not that great but not obscenely overpaid. Plus it's a lot easier to live with his shortcomings when the Bulls also have Noah and Gibson.
-The Rooster is overrated as it stands but he has the potential to step it up at some point. It's not he's fatally flawed like Bargnani.
The Johnson trade is simply indefensible. The Nets were in the Dwight Howard race yet because they were so desperate to placate Deron Williams, they went ahead and took on one of the worst contracts in the NBA -- if not the worst. So not only did they take on that contract, they took themselves out of the Howard running -- which in hindsight they probably could have won if they would have just waited a little longer. Even if they didn't land Howard, they could have landed some other max contract since players are flocking to Brooklyn like they are Lakers East.
The Nets had a chance to become the next Heat by using the Brooklyn draw to grab a few max players. Instead they were so consumed with keeping Deron Williams that they ended up becoming a slightly better version of the Hawks. The Johnson contract basically guarantees the Nets won't win a championship anytime soon.
The cherry on top of that ishstorm of decisions is that Deron Williams isn't even that good anymore.
Which is why the entire process was stupid from the beginning, tbh..
Deron Williams is perennially overrated, the Nets mortgaged their short-term future to satisfy him, instead becoming a team that will remain in the 1st or 2nd round..
A lot of people are understating Gallinari's struggles IMO..he's a low-IQ chucker that can't shoot on a consistent basis, while offering nothing on the defensive end..he has yet to produce a consistent stretch of basketball at any point of his NBA career..I don't see much of a difference between Bargnani and Gallinari..
As much as you guys want to piss on the Gordon situation, he would still be the easiest to trade and you'd get back the most for him. That doesn't sound too bad to me.
Apparently every BNMV acts and says the exact same as every other one. Can't conjure up a relevant thought of your own, so copy and paste someone's better thought that doesn't even apply to the situation. Poor troll attempt.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
