Reply With Quote
So in other words, you would like to cry about someone calling Ibaka a fake tough guy, and state what everyone already pretty much knows?
Ok, let's say Ibaka is, fine. Ibaka barks with no bite. So what about Jackson? WOuld he not be one too? He seems to be all bark and no bite unless you're a fan. Noone has yet to give me some sort of evidence that Jackson is anything more than all talk. All anyone can say is he has tattoos and a weapons charge. So?
So in other words, you would like to cry about someone calling Ibaka a fake tough guy, and state what everyone already pretty much knows?
No.So in other words, you would like to cry about someone calling Ibaka a fake tough guy, and state what everyone already pretty much knows?
I don't care if someone calls Ibaka a "fake tough guy". I'd just like someone to explain to me what it is about Jackson that distinguishes him from Ibaka as being a "real tough guy" as opposed to a "fake tough guy". So far the answer are 1)tattoos 2)drug and weapons charges and 3) hitting a fan. I'm waiting for a legit answer. I won't get one though, because there isn't one.
Jackson not fake tough because he gonna throw down if you challenge him. did ibaka do anything more than try to stare down n talk ta Artest when harden flopped off his elbow? Artest ready to throw down n ibaka stopped advancing. He knew Artest gonna fight n Jackson gonna fight too if he provoked. only guy those two gon be scared of was big Ben cuz he gon crush they skull with his bare hands
And again, noone can answer the question I've asked a million times. Same old answer every time. Jackson's gonna throw down, Jackson's a real tough guy. Jackson has tattoos and a gun charge. BFD. Noone can give me an instance where Jackson's ever put his money where his mouth is, other than hitting a fan, which in itself is quite lame. Jackson's never done a DAMN thing to another able bodied professional athlete. All he does is talk . Prove me otherwise.
the tough guy is willing ta throw down, ibaka shown he afraid of Artest
Don't worry.. I'm sure Stak5 can sell at least 3000 copies of his album to make up for the fine.
I didn't see many people here calling him a "real tough guy" aside from a guy who was clearly trolling you. Unfortunately you are too stupid to realize that, which is understandable, being that you are from a dump like Oklahoma.
Seriously? Dude, Oklahoma and Texas are the same damn thing. Let's call a spade a spade. If there wasn't a defined border and a name change you wouldn't know the damn difference.
Oklahoma is Texas' hat.
Then again, your state is pastier than "full of Mexicans" Texas... and Texas is big enough that Dallas is not the same as Houston is not the same as San Antonio.
OKC and Tulsa, only "major" cities. 101 miles apart. I just find it really amusing how either people of OK or TX act like the other is really any different. There's very little difference. We're not exactly comparing NY and LA here.
Trust me, there is plenty of difference. My wife has family in OKC and Tulsa. Her family is cool, but the cities blow monumental amounts of ass. And I can't count how many people I've met in OKC that are dying to move to DFW because it sucks so bad up there.
Texas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oklahoma
Ive been here basically all my life. I don't know anyone that wants to move to Dallas. I'm sure they exist. I'm not real sure what about OKC blows "monumental amounts of ass". I guess everyone has their likes and dislikes. I think it's a nice city. It's not perfect, but no city is. All in all, OK and TX are pretty similar.
Except for one fact.
They aren't.
yeah sure
You're suggesting I'm lying? Why the would I lie about that?
crofl similar
If Texas was full of drunk indians and smelt like used cat litter then perhaps they would be.
Learn to 1) spell and 2) obtain facts before you insult other people. Smelt is not a form of the world smell, by the way. Also, only 8.9% of the population of Oklahoma is American Indian - hardly what I would consider "full of". Nice try.
cauz you're a troll
Dont know what to tell you. I've lived here just about my whole life.
Trying to compare your hick-ass state to one of the only states who have their together
When's the last time you were in either state? You must have a lot of knowledge about both states. I'd like to hear your opinion that you've formed from your first hand experiences of being in these two states.
That explains quite a bit.
Wow you got me on det one. Oh no...I said det and not that. Congrats on cementing yourself as a Kidd K level, grammar policing got.
Since indians represent almost a tenth of your population, I looked it up to see what the exact number was...only to find out there is only like 3.8 million people in that ty wasteland of a state that you live in. Pretty ing sad. That's less than the the combined population of Dallas and Tarrant counties. rofl.
Since you are a person that likes facts, here's some that I stumbled upon...Over a forty year period, from 1970 to 2010, Oklahoma's entire state population only increased by a little over a million people. The whole ing state. Did you know that Dallas County by itself increased by a million people over that time? ...even San Antonio alone increased by 700k.
It's pretty obvious the difference between Oklahoma and Texas. People are coming to/staying in Texas, not barren, worthless holes like Oklahoma. If they were actually the same as you suggest, wouldn't your entire state population increase more over long periods of time than some Texas counties have?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions