Did he hijack that place? Who else was on board with him?
Was that a terrorist attack? I thought he was attempting a murder/suicide, but what do I know?
Now I am at fault in not specifying "terrorist attack" in my other post.
Way WH23 plays D: I one time scored an offensive player in the back of the net and got away with it. He was crowding my goalie, so I shouldered him off and walked him into the back of the net.
Yeah, WH, just walk him into the back of the net, my goalie said.
Totally illegal. You can't play defense past the goal line. I didn't know, but apparently, the refs never call that, or at least, didn't that time. I scored a player in the back of my own goal. Never saw that before or since.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/oba...matic-weapons/
This was on the 03 of December
You misspell so many words, trust me, you have no right ever calling someone else out.
He doesn't know either. As assault rifle is fully automatic. Assault weapons are different.
How about this: When the President no longer has guns protecting him, when his body guards no longer use assault rifles, semi-autos and all that, he can have a leg to stand on. That's when it will be safe enough to not actually need a gun. If the President needs that kind of protection, why don't we get at least some?
Why are you linking me a blog with a link to Fox News on it?
Are you trying to intimate that the shooting was staged? There is a gun lobby and most of the NATO countries ban semiauto's. I don't get your point. Yes, there are people that want gun control. I fail to see what your point here is.
I don't mind being "called out" for spelling. Don't be afraid to tell me if I misspell something, butch. It's just words -- I don't know how you live in such fear.
So when someone calls you out you claim you've won, they are mad and they are in fear. Great tactics if you're 15. If I tracked all your spelling mistakes we'd discuss little else here.
I don't always say it -- it was just so apparent in this instance.You just retreat from your positions so quickly, it's hilariously entertaining. There's no way I will stop tormenting you if you keep doing this.If I tracked all your spelling mistakes we'd discuss little else here.
lol equating my refusal to spend any time explaining the world to you as "retreating".
lol "tormenting"
lol you not getting that I've said everything that the NRA said before they said it (in another thread... do your homework)
Is your take always so skewed in your favor? I doubt anyone else who's not your cohort sees it that way.
Well, now you're spending time whining about it. Which is worse?
See above.lol "tormenting"
OK, so you want the federal government to pay for all the new cops in every school in America. That reinforces my initial point about conservatives. Thanks.lol you not getting that I've said everything that the NRA said before they said it (in another thread... do your homework)
Is my take always accurate and defensible? More often than others and certainly more than yours in this case. My only suggestion is you quit worrying about my takes and improve yours.Is your take always so skewed in your favor? I doubt anyone else who's not your cohort sees it that way.
lol constant post judge, contributing absolutely nothing but demanding everything.
lol not getting anything from me but a hard time.
Actually the butthurt you are experiencing is quite entertaining.
I don't expect anything more from you related to the topic since you realized you were ed if you went on.
For the most part of my time on here I've ignored your posts because you're always involved in some sort of long winded e-spat, but lately you've caught my attention. Is this how you are 24/7 71,000 on this board? You're quite a chippy confident fellow who seems to spend the majority of his time online arguing. Wouldn't surprise me in the least bit if you one day turned up to be one of these psychos. You're nuts dude. Your posting history proves this.
I'm not. i do keep odd hours often.So you know me only by my posts.You're quite a chippy confident fellow who seems to spend the majority of his time online arguing. Wouldn't surprise me in the least bit if you one day turned up to be one of these psychos. You're nuts dude. Your posting history proves this.
OK.
It will be fun to watch others chime in now.
InB472000
Sowell LIES (typical conservative)
"They simply disarm law-abiding citizens"
bull . Severe firearm, ammo regulation disarms not a single regulation-abiding person.
And it disarms criminals as well? yeah! I'm all about disarming criminals, where do we start?!?! Lets first make them register everything, then we can track them. Next, let's limit their ammo capacity, that way they have to take two seconds to drop a mag and reload. After that, no collapsible stock! I hate the look of a gun -1" shorter than a 16". Evil feature!!! Flash hider?!?! Evil feature!!!! You all on the left have to agree with how silly your gun control laws have played out no?
Seriously, explain to me how further gun (as in tool) restrictions would be of any benefit to society. And I'm not talking about ease if getting a gun as I also believe background checks/process of obtaining a gun should be heavily regulated.
Convince me that regulating law abiding citizens would do anything to deter crime.
Wow, circular reasoning at its finest.
You don't offer much in the way of meaningful conversation. You just post grade and accuse people of being butthurt because they didn't follow your carrot on a stick.
Most of the time I'm picking out rather obvious flaws in other people's arguments. The less insecure posters can just accept it and go on with the rest of their argument, since the flaw usually isn't fatal to it. Others see what they did wrong, but get so worried about what they think are their e-reps that they will do anything to avoid discussing it. That's usually when they try to change the subject to me.
It's quite predictable after all this time as you might imagine. Still funny though. Especially just how long people will compose posts for me telling me how they won't waste time composing posts for me.
^nice deflection, doesn't change the fact that you rarely (ever??) offer to the board though. Catty nitpicking and lame insults X 72,000 still = 0.
You are welcome to your opinion, though it is worth noting you have definitely been in the latter group of the two I described above.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
