Find the Dangerous Features

[DMC]

Of course you are. Your idiotic assumptions make you look even more ridiculous during your mul hread holiday meltdown.

Trying to reassure yourself you are right is just as effective as shooting it.

lol forum bickering got always says someone else is on a meltdown.

lol taking the lib side to every argument then proclaiming to not actually believe it.

[Shastafarian]

What am I trying to prove? I stated blacks have a genetic predisposition to commit crimes. I've shown you the research and the stats to support it. You've dismissed both without good reason.

You're trying to prove black people are more likely to commit crimes based on their genetics. You fail at proving such.

No, you didn't.

I did.

You are offended at the data and are trying to discredit the messenger.

I'm not offended by data I know how to interpret the data and know it really doesn't mean much.

This is a thread I started. How were you "met" here?

King of Semantics! It must be awesome to be such royalty on an internet forum. You greet legitimate questions with bull and arrogance. The problem is your arrogance really has nothing to support it.

[ChumpDumper]

lol forum bickering got always says someone else is on a meltdown.

Aw, looks like I struck a nerve. Excellent.

lol taking the lib side to every argument then proclaiming to not actually believe it.

You still haven't read anything I have posted on the actual topic with those who didn't lose their like you did. Also excellent.

[Shastafarian]

So answer questions that you're too lazy to even research when I point it out to you, but don't presume you're uneducated. Ok. Probably not going to happen.

Are you dense? I asked what YOUR thoughts on the matter were. I guess I'll just take that to mean you don't have thoughts of your own (other than black = african). Can't say I'm surprised.

[DMC]

Aw, looks like I struck a nerve. Excellent.

You still haven't read anything I have posted on the actual topic with those who didn't lose their like you did. Also excellent.

I rarely read anything you post tbh. It's normally just petty bickering between you and asshole checker up in the Club that goes on for 20 pages.

[DMC]

Are you dense? I asked what YOUR thoughts on the matter were. I guess I'll just take that to mean you don't have thoughts of your own (other than black = african). Can't say I'm surprised.

On what matter?

[ChumpDumper]

I rarely read anything you post tbh.

Especially when it proves you completely wrong. I can see why you would want to skip that or at least pretend to do so.

[DMC]

Especially when it proves you completely wrong. I can see why you would want to skip that or at least pretend to do so.

Nah, you don't have enough time between posts to actually do any research and like I said, you post too much to even be a decent troll.

[ChumpDumper]

Nah, you don't have enough time between posts to actually do any research and like I said, you post too much to even be a decent troll.

We weren't even talking about anything that had to be researched. You made a colossally stupid assumption and it got destroyed. Now all you can do is act like it never happened.

[DMC]

What assumption?

[ChumpDumper]

What assumption?

[leemajors]

I have him on ignore, sometimes I open to see what he's yammering about. If I don't respond it's likely because I didn't see it. He's been on ignore, along with Mouse, for a long time.

It was phrased in a very amusing manner

[DMC]

It was phrased in a very amusing manner

Oh I'm sure but it's not hard to discern that it's going to lead to a bash on Asians.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Odd that you use a drop in gun related fatalities in Australia to show the effectiveness of a gun ban but scoff at crime statistics and scientific research to show genetic predisposition. It's a case of "believe what you like". Don't worry Fuzzy, the blacks will still like you just as much if you discuss genetic traits associated with race. Pandering isn't required.

I've seen you do much better than this week poorly thought out half assed aversion.

You don't even address anything actually said anymore. You just talk around points. I never poo pooed statistics being used. I just said that the UCD study was unrelated to the 'warrior gene' studies you are talking about. You are taking statistics from clearly two separate sources and trying to merge them. That is a no no.

That is not me "scoff(ing) at crime statistics and scientific research." You know that too you deceptive .

The mixing in the shrink putting every person in three categories was also unrelated but you needed the label to categorize black people and call them criminals.

[DMC]

I've seen you do much better than this week poorly thought out half assed aversion.

You don't even address anything actually said anymore. You just talk around points. I never poo pooed statistics being used. I just said that the UCD study was unrelated to the 'warrior gene' studies you are talking about. You are taking statistics from clearly two separate sources and trying to merge them. That is a no no.

That is not me "scoff(ing) at crime statistics and scientific research." You know that too you deceptive .

The mixing in the shrink putting every person in three categories was also unrelated but you needed the label to categorize black people and call them criminals.

I think I nailed it pretty well. It's gotten a few of you in a tizzy.

[ChumpDumper]

I think I nailed it pretty well. It's gotten a few of you in a tizzy.

lol you lost your mind