Imagine, gun free America

[clambake]

Hey I just make the rules, the criminals will do what they wish.

gun free utopia....you said.

[Blake]

Of course. In both the West and East.

then why would the west call the east for help?

[TSA]

gun free utopia....you said.

If you chose the West for your sake I would hope the criminals would obey the rules.

[TSA]

then why would the west call the east for help?

What's an easier target? An armed or unarmed society? If I were a criminal I sure as would move West.

[clambake]

If you chose the West for your sake I would hope the criminals would obey the rules.

no guns in the west.......you said.

[Oh, Gee!!]

I clearly said no guns on the West, guns in the East.

the thread le says "gun free america." america encompasses east and west. you baited and switched us.

[TSA]

So now if there's a threat of someone bringing guns in you don't like the gun free utopia anymore? In this scenario I can only control law abiding citizens, sorry.

[Oh, Gee!!]

I came into this thread imagining a gun free america, just to be disappointed to learn that only half of america was gun free.

[Oh, Gee!!]

So now if there's a threat of someone bringing guns in you don't like the gun free utopia anymore? In this scenario I can only control law abiding citizens, sorry.

but if it's a utopia, it's perfect. so there is no threat of outside forces ruining it because they can't because I won't let them as guardian of this utopia. furthermore, I'll put a curse on your land.

[TSA]

I came into this thread imagining a gun free america, just to be disappointed to learn that only half of america was gun free.

my bad.

[Jeff Van Gundy]

This hypothetical isn't working out too well.....time to make another ty thread

[TSA]

It's working out just how I thought it would. The gun free zone doesn't sound so nice once people realize the criminals don't care about the laws set in place.

[ChumpDumper]

So it was a gay reference. You said it wasn't.

It certainly was not as I demonstrated quite clearly. My now saying you're gay had nothing to do with the original post, rather it was an acknowledgement of your immediately assuming it was gay reference because you are apparently quite gay.

If you don't understand that, you're stupid too -- which is worse than being gay tbh.

[ElNono]

Japan has no guns per se.

When is the last time a japanese has killed scores of children with an automatic?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schoo...na_(2010–2012)

A series of uncoordinated mass stabbings, hammer attacks, and cleaver attacks in the People's Republic of China began in March 2010

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1376982.stm

Pupils die in Japan knife massacre

[TSA]

It certainly was not as I demonstrated quite clearly. My now saying you're gay had nothing to do with the original post, rather it was an acknowledgement of your immediately assuming it was gay reference because you are apparently quite gay.

If you don't understand that, you're stupid too -- which is worse than being gay tbh.

stupidly unfunny

[TSA]

A series of uncoordinated mass stabbings, hammer attacks, and cleaver attacks in the People's Republic of China began in March 2010



Pupils die in Japan knife massacre

And I asked him to find me the last time an American used an automatic to massacre children. Just wanted to point out that just because there are no guns doesn't mean there aren't massacres.

[clambake]

It's working out just how I thought it would. The gun free zone doesn't sound so nice once people realize the criminals don't care about the laws set in place.

you said gun free. that means no guns.

[ElNono]

And I asked him to find me the last time an American used an automatic to massacre children. Just wanted to point out that just because there are no guns doesn't mean there aren't massacres.

So when is the last time a japanese has killed scores of children with any gun?

[Oh, Gee!!]

It's working out just how I thought it would. The gun free zone doesn't sound so nice once people realize the criminals don't care about the laws set in place.

Close your eyes and imagine a thread wherein TSA attempts to make a brilliant pro-gun argument, fails miserably, yet still claims victory. Now open your eyes and read this very thread.

[TSA]

So when is the last time a japanese has killed scores of children with any gun?

Not what he asked.

[TSA]

Close your eyes and imagine a thread wherein TSA attempts to make a brilliant pro-gun argument, fails miserably, yet still claims victory. Now open your eyes and read this very thread.

I'm very sorry I forgot to mention criminals would still exist in the scenario. Not sure where the fail is and I'm sure everyone gets the point, a gun free zone will never be gun free, criminals don't follow rules.

[clambake]

so...now the west has guns. just like the east.

[Blake]

What's an easier target? An armed or unarmed society? If I were a criminal I sure as would move West.

Not what I asked.

then why would the west call the east for help?

And if the west has armed cops, then it's an armed society.

[TSA]

so...now the west has guns. just like the east.

I assumed you'd want armed LEO's.

[TSA]

Not what I asked.



And if the west has armed cops, then it's an armed society.

an armed society includes its citizens.