The players know better than anyone else who the best is from their era if they played against them. Players that are retired and analyzing players they never played against might not always be on the mark though.
If theres one thing we can all agree on, its that the majority of basketball players are terrible analysts.
The players know better than anyone else who the best is from their era if they played against them. Players that are retired and analyzing players they never played against might not always be on the mark though.
Knocking a team or a player because of viewership in the finals? that is some funny . There is a reason why they have pyrotechnics and dancing girls during basketball games....or pop stars at half-time... Trying to get the casual viewer involved. If you are a real basketball fan, then you respect top notch basketball. I couldn't care less about casual fan "viewership".
As far as no back to back? Give me a break. A ship is a ship. Spurs won three in five years and were two plays away from possibly winning 5 in a row. LA has never won more than three in five years so that is a non issue.
What Duncan and the Spurs (and Pop) have accomplished with absolutely no top 20 picks (after Duncan), no draw for free agents, and keeping pretty close to the vest as far as budget is remarkable. LA has every built-in advantage possible and yet have one more championship over the last 15 years as well as three years of missing the playoffs alltogether... Duncan has done more with less...
So Kobe wins by default because there was no compe ion for the SG spot. Big whoop
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)