God exists. That a claim. To evaluate the claim, ask yourself if there is any evidence supporting that claim. No? Then don't believe the claim is true until there is corroborating evidence. It's literally that simple.
Who says God exists? What is God? Who is God? None of these will even matter until you first figure out - who YOU are. Who put you together? Who installed the program in your brain for you to be functioning this way? Or - in other words- who programmed/brainwashed you?
Those questions should be dealt with -----BEFORE---- you even think of dealing with - Does God exist? Who is God? What is God? What was God before humans arrived on this planet?
None of those matter until you discover who programmed you and who is living inside you now.
Why do you keep repeating this stupid claim? Love is a result of chemical processes in the brain. It is known what causes it and why it occurs.
What you described is DESIRE -which is not love.
You're just posting random things at this point. Nothing random. God/love/freedom are one and the same thing - human beings just use different names/labels
Nothing unexplained, unknown or unknowable about these things. Then explain them.
A mental state.
The whole point of burden of proof is to evaluate the unknown. It is perfect for this situation, just like it is perfect for any other situation where somebody makes a claim.
They do not apply when no one on the entire planet has ever correctly defined what God/love is. You can't apply conventional/human logic/formulas to an unexplained mystery. Waste of time.
Like trying to teach a Pig to sing. It only wastes your time- and it in' irritates the Pig.
But go ahead and spend your time trying to argue an unexplainable mystery with human logic/tools/formulas.
No, it isn't self-evident. You still haven't give any reason why one can't use logic.
Circles and wasting time on blind people.
False analogy.
Again you're an idiot. God's a mystery? Okay, then, an infinite amount of things are a mystery. That doesn't mean that we should just believe in bull . Burden of proof does apply, like it always does in any situation where somebody makes a claim.