We, the people. Earn your ,moniker.
It doesn't take a semi auto to defend your home, does it?
Wrong again. I read it, thought it was funny and posted it. Still waiting for you to say you were wrong for the previous wrong.And not a bad idea for you to change the direction of this thread, with luck maybe they'll forget what a ing idiot you were for posting some bull story you didn't even bother to read.
I'm not the one claiming they are excessive, this isn't about what I think. Answer the question, why are semiautos excessive to you?
Blake, I'm sorry I called your article a thinkprogress article, even though they are almost word for word. I'd be embarrassed too. I was wrong Cuck. You happy?
lol
random, commas, just for, the, of it.,
red necks lol
lol @ private ownership of fissile material.
lol.. internet tough guy..
Because I don't think it takes a semi auto to defend your home.
You're not very bright.
You don't have to apologize for being wrong. Since you cry about others not admitting when they're wrong, you just need to acknowledge your own wrongness to avoid being a hypocrite.Blake, I'm sorry I called your article a thinkprogress article, even though they are almost word for word. I'd be embarrassed too. I was wrong Cuck. You happy?
and I'm not a cuck, so that makes you wrong again. Third time in this thread by my count.
What? We have to REGISTER our explosives and RPGs? Don't they know that just means only the criminals will possess these items?
What happens if the people who come to rob my house in the middle of the night have machine guns? By rights, that LOGICALLY means I would need AT LEAST a machine gun to defend myself! Maybe even a rail gun, or lasers! If we outlaw full auto uzis, machine guns and other weapons, then roving gangs of hoodlums will be the only ones who have them!
I own 3 registered Chihuahuas. /Thread
People shouldn't drag the nuke strawman into the debate, regardles of what side they're on.
In the op, it's definitely straw because of the way they presented the dumb congressman's statement.
but here if I argue " if the 2nd amendment grants the right to bear any arms, then nuclear arms would have to be included", then it wouldn't be straw at all.
Last edited by Blake; 03-26-2013 at 02:46 PM.
Exactly. The law abiding people register them and the criminals don't, so any new gun registration legislation would just inconvenience and threaten law abiding citizens because the criminals would ignore it. The legislation would be pointless.
Which goes right into my argument for allowing everyone to genetically enhance their own pets. What if TB comes to my house with his three vicious chihooahooahs? My poor pitbulls might not stand a chance, which is why we need to allow modifications like sharper teeth, extra teeth, or an extra head to hold extra sharper teeth.
thats a fairly weak argument.
ex-cuck?
I'd have more, but I can only buy a 3 round clip!
What do/would you use to defend yourself when you're out in public?
That's not what TSA takes with him.
In fact, TSA doesn't carry a gun at all.
Have you ever had to draw your weapon for protection?
I have drawn it, didn't aim it, just showed it. Dude backed down.
Back in my wilder younger days drew down on a guy with a shotgun when he drew down on my buddy while trying to jack us.
lol I played lots of gigs at a Bandido bar in Lubbock back in the 90's. Anytime a drunk frat boy ed with us on stage, somebody from the club drew on him.
Do you understand how hard it is to get a CCW in CA?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
