Is this a reverse jinx?
Wrong. Bledsoe gives Parker and in the playoffs in minutes they shared the court Parker shot just a tad over 30 percent. Bledsoe's stronger, faster and more athletic. Parker will get eaten alive by Bledsoe's defense in big minutes.
Is this a reverse jinx?
No, it's an educated opinion based on watching this year's Clippers in big games....
Clips had this game circled. Were gettin their best shot right now. Not worried bout these scrubs when it matters. Don't think anybody's scared of them tbqh
Tim started slow, even Sean was frustrated with him being indecisive on O and on D he's didn't nothing worth writing home about so whatever. Never said I could predict the future.
Now keep writing in big letters, doesn't make you look like a kid playing with dad's computer at all.
i wonder if our bench being trash has anything with manu playing like trash? anyone got stats on that?
I think Tiago coming off the bench was a big part of it too.
Head to head matchup..
Game 1 (Spurs loss)
Tony Parker 23 Points, 5 Assist, 1 Steal (40mins)
Chris Paul 17 Points, 13 Assist, 4 Steals (41mins)
--
Game 2 (Game 2)
Tony Parker 11 Points, 3 Assist, No Steal (37mins)
Chris Paul 30 Points, 12 Assist, 1 Steal (40mins)
--
Game 3 (Spurs win)
Tony Parker 31 Points, 11 Assist, No Steal (40mins)
Chris Paul 35 Points, 9 Assist, 1 Steal (41mins)
--
Game 4 (Spurs win)
Tony Parker 21 Points, 8 Assist, 1 Steal (31mins)
Chris Paul 23 Points, 5 Assist, 3 Steals (31mins)
--
Game 5 (Spurs Loss)
Tony Parker 18 Points, 4 Assist, 0 Steal (38mins)
Chris Paul 22 Points, 14 Assist, 1 Steals (42mins)
--
Game 6 (Spurs win)
Tony Parker 15 Points, 4 Assist, 2 Steal (30mins)
Chris Paul 21 Points, 8 Assist, 3 Steals (38mins)
--
Game 7 (Spurs win)
Tony Parker 17 Points, 5 Assist, s Steal (43mins)
Chris Paul 18 Points, 14 Assist, 5 Steals (47mins)
--
While the numbers seems to indicate this was an evenly match head to head it wasn't.
Furthermore, Tony and the Spurs continue to own CP in regular season games and during playoffs game. Fact.
It is also a well known fact CP loves to play in garbage time for stat padding purposes so stats may seem inflated because of it. Just in this instance, look at the minutes played in that playoffs series alone.![]()
Pop playing Neal instead of Cojo is mind boggling tbh
Ironically enough, the content of your posts do that for you.![]()
Looking at the positives of Manu's energy, maybe it'll help Neal get back to where he was earlier in the season and last season and Kawhi will get aggressive again. I really hope Manu gets it together for the playoffs though, he really is the key to our championship hopes.
Are you being serious or are you sarcastic?
Obviously it has a of a lot to do with Manu playing like trash (and, you know, not playing in general because he's injured all the time).
Lol. The Clippers have scored 40+ twice in quarters this year and scoring big isn't rare for them. If anything they are playing like considering the Spurs are shooting what 60 percent? Both teams playing great offensively, ty on defense. I wouldn't take anything from this. Duncan having his best first half in probably a decade... Parker has what 15? And your team is DOWN.
For sure. It also doesn't help that Neal is seriously hurt and Jack has played like he's 55.
Those numbers actually seem to indicate that CP3 dominated Tony, except for Games 3 and 4 where they are roughly even. CP3 has stats advantage in every other game.
What you're showing me with these numbers is at worst they play each other evenly. Nothing that indicates that Parker owns CP3 Derrick Rose style or anything.
At the time you posted that, Duncan had 11 points. Deandre had 6.
Keep it up. You really are good at this posting thing.
He had 20+ vs Memphis
Is there a bigger got in this thread than Clipperfan86? Jesus, I can't take anymore of his stupid takes.
Kansas choking in the Tourney per par
Not so tough without the ref advantage
Holy .
Never post again.
I'm serious.
Because you're stupid.
nvm, I just read that Pop (the user) quote. He takes the cake.
Tell me how gotten to you really are, I'm not sure I fully understand.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)