Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 40 of 40
  1. #26
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    41,384
    grizz backcourt sucks monkey seriously...

  2. #27
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Post Count
    54,257
    Though this mother er has never done a ing thing except look good not doing it.

    He's a living, breathing example of symbolism over substance.
    Sounds a lot like Kirby between Shaq getting kicked out and Pau taking him in, tbh

  3. #28
    BUSsell Will Spur-Addict's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    10,935
    Grizz have no consistent perimeter attack. Clips would be a better matchup with their depth and offensive diversity.

  4. #29
    Social Assassin LarryDavid's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    721
    I don't think either has a chance to beat them, but at least the Clippers would put up some semblance of resistance.

  5. #30
    Believe. mercos's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    1,185
    Clippers. I doubt either team can truly challenge OKC at this point, but Lob City will at least wear them down a bit with all the running.

  6. #31
    Believe. Brunodf's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    5,824
    He's averaging 20 points and 10 assists in his playoff career, which is surprising, because GNSF insist he's a playoff choker and that Elite PG Tony Parker is better because he dominated Bbie Gibsn in the Finals once....
    TP always outplayed CP3...That's the argument.

  7. #32
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,825
    The Clippers wouldn't be an easy clean at that point. Frankly, they're on the cusp. Billups changes them, settles them, transforms them.

    He'll take them with him.
    Truth. Especially when you compare him to one Willie Green

  8. #33
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Post Count
    54,257
    Truth. Especially when you compare him to one Willie Green
    The weird thing, though, is that the Clippers seemed to play better in the regular season with Willie in the starting lineup, tbh.... it forced CP3 to be aggressive from the opening tip instead of overly deferring to an aging Chauncey who was clearly coasting until the playoffs....

    That being said, if Game 1 was any indication of how Mr. Big Shot is going to play in the playoffs, the old man still has it and clearly deserves to start....

  9. #34
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,825
    The weird thing, though, is that the Clippers seemed to play better in the regular season with Willie in the starting lineup, tbh.... it forced CP3 to be aggressive from the opening tip instead of overly deferring to an aging Chauncey who was clearly coasting until the playoffs....

    That being said, if Game 1 was any indication of how Mr. Big Shot is going to play in the playoffs, the old man still has it and clearly deserves to start....
    Yeah they were rolling early in the season. I actually watch most Clippers games (live in LA, so I watch pretty much every faker game and about 3/4 of clipper games), and while Green was doing OK, he's nothing more than a glue guy. He's just a lesser Caron Butler out there for the most part. The main issue with the Paul-Billups backcourt is if they need to defend a bigger guard. Chauncey's success throughout his career stemmed from being a strong point guard who would post up. Now, he's a small shooting guard, so its a complete 180. That said, against the Grizz, their only good scoring guards are Conley and Bayless, both of whom can be defended by Chauncey without being exploited, and against OKC he'll guard Kevin Martin. Sefolosha is a big dude, but he's not a scorer except in transition. Otherwise he's a stop and pop guy.

  10. #35
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    91,195
    The weird thing, though, is that the Clippers seemed to play better in the regular season with Willie in the starting lineup, tbh.... it forced CP3 to be aggressive from the opening tip instead of overly deferring to an aging Chauncey who was clearly coasting until the playoffs....

    That being said, if Game 1 was any indication of how Mr. Big Shot is going to play in the playoffs, the old man still has it and clearly deserves to start....
    Go on with your bad self. Git far enough to stomp a mudhole in Tonio's ass, then proceed to walk the er dry.

    Chop/chop.

  11. #36
    Believe. benstanfield's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    1,743
    I woulda said Grizz before I saw game 1. Prince is more passive than Boris Diaw, and if Gasol/Randolph can only manage 6 combined rebounds in 66 total minutes then they're probably a lottery quality team. Their backups wings are hot garbage.

    Clippers, however, have straight assassins coming off the bench in Bledsoe/Crawford, who will exploit Martin and Fisher. They don't match up well at the 3 spot against Durant, but they have the firepower to at least make games interesting. Brooks and VDN basically cancel each other out, and Griffin/Jordan v. Ibaka/Perk is a wash. What Paul has in leadership/bbiq Westbrook makes up for with athleticism. So it basically comes down to the Thunders advantage with Durant versus the Clippers' advantage off the bench.

  12. #37
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    91,195
    ^Pau, I mean Paul, well & Pau, but, Paul in this instance needs somebody to take him. He can't go by himself. Durant as well. Westbrook can go by himself, but, I don't know if he can, or, even if Durant would permit him to take him. Paul will let Billups take him, & gladly so.

  13. #38
    Erryday I'm Hustlin' Robz4000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    39,737
    Funny how some think Grizz if they'd find their 2011 form would challenge today's OKC. Heck, the younger inexperienced 2011 OKC beat 2011 Grizzlies what makes you think 2011 Grizz will beat today's OKC? As for the question, Clippers.
    Never said anything about beating them, just that they'd be more of a challenge than the Clippers. That 2011 Grizz team had Zbo playing out of his mind, a great defense (better than this year's Grizz imo), and more confidence.

  14. #39
    Veteran Spurs da champs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    3,160
    The Grizzlies are better with Rudy Gay, fact.

  15. #40
    Veteran
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    8,957
    I would think that if the Clippers get to the 2nd round and face the Thunder that Stern may be tempted to help them win because they do play in Los Angeles. He knows that an LA team would make him more money in the Finals than Acutane's team would. We could see the Nuggets and Clippers in the WCF because of Stern. The Lakers aren't going to beat the Spurs in the first round, sorry.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •