I completely skipped that detail when I was looking over the article. That definitely changes my level of interest.
if true that's a damn good reason not to get one at 32 or 64.
I completely skipped that detail when I was looking over the article. That definitely changes my level of interest.
Because of the portability to go along with and touch screen. Those weigh heavily for me.
Good info on Surface here:
http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/17/3...tore-employees
RT does not have a full version of Office, or Legacy App support i.e. anything coded to run on x86/64 - no backwards compatability.
Verge Review:
http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/23/3...surface-review
7.0
potential unrealized so far is the consensus. ny times was more apt. the hardware is amazing, drool worthy. then the software, and they get depressed.
Been meaning to ask this for awhile. Has there ever been a worse commercial to launch a product? those dancing schoolgirls look angry as too
Surface Pro will have half of the Surface battery life:
http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/29/3...attery-life-rt
acer has made ty products since day 1, wtf are they to say anything? my first computer, not the first in the house, back in the 90's was an acer and that pos was just that, a pos! i doubt they've gotten any better since. that's like emachine thinking they have any clout.
This was pretty awful
I bought an Acer desktop in 2006
It died in 2009
Acer
that's a pretty good run for an acer... pretty damn impressed.
64GB Surface Pro will have 23GB usable space:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/29/39...pace-windows-8
![]()
overpriced for that piece of , u can build one cheaper than that...look at the htpcs and low energy builds u can build...or even the rasberry
go ahead, build a tablet.
More stupid engineering... smh
Why not include a separate 32gb 'recovery' pendrive with the package instead?
That's absurd.
However the backup par ion is probably like 10 gigs.
Completely absurd they couldn't get it down under 15. I think a full Mountain Lion install is somewhere around 5GB.
To be fair, Windows is a lot more compatible with multiple devices.
Very true. Just really surprised they coulndt cut some fat with their flagship product.
Uh? This is a tablet. You don't need any major drivers other than possibly just mass storage.
Plus it's a connected device. Have it download any weird driver after the base OS installation.
The bloat comes from the built-in apps + backups of said apps on the restore par ion.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/20/40...ominate-volume
After describing Surface as a "design point" to "prime the pump" and "sell a few million," Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer is describing the company's tablets as a "real business" this week. In a brief interview with MIT technology Review, Ballmer avoids answering Surface sales questions, but says he's "super-glad" Microsoft did the Surface as it's important for the Windows ecosystem. "Surface is a real business," says Ballmer. "In an environment in which there’s 350 million PCs sold, I don’t think Surface is going to dominate volume, but it’s a real business."
I predict a class action lawsuit for false advertising on the usable storage for the Surface...
So who bought the microsoft surface?Is it worth?
Nobody has bought this piece of
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)