Oh man, playing forum cop now too. U mad.
You certainly stopped talking about the Spurs long ago.
I recommend keeping the flame attempts to one thread per forum. Others may be tiring of it.
Oh man, playing forum cop now too. U mad.
You certainly stopped talking about the Spurs long ago.
I recommend keeping the flame attempts to one thread per forum. Others may be tiring of it.
Jesus.
You did make it made.
Activate ignore feature.
It's a talent.
And a curse.
Kind of fun, though.
Still only posting about me?
Shouldn't expect anything else. Helps you cope.
Exactly what I have been saying, its not Pop's fault. And for the parker's case i think they were trying to trick miami into thinking they were going to call a timeout for parker to enter and instead push the ball..
Still all about me.
I still recommend keeping the flame war in the Popsucker thread. You can keep bumping it with all the ad hominems you want. There was some good stuff going on here before you started coping all over the place.
He shouldn't even have started the fourth quarter.
No, the focus was defending and rebounding. Waiting for your list of who's better than Duncan at both. I'll wait.
Well, defending the three point line. Duncan isn't the best at that.
I'm not sure you can say I'm ruining this thread tbh.
Another thread down by Chump's trolling. Just post porno, same crap.
I tried.
Only when there is likely to be screens and the potential for dribble penetration. But in a desperation catch-and-shoot situation, it's harder to imagine a better defender. Not to mention that Bosh was on the floor and although he has range, he is not the most nimble of shooters. Pretty sure Duncan could have played soft D at the three-point line against Bosh in that situation.
Taking Duncan out is inexcusable. Not fouling was inexcusable. Continuing to spell Parker and Duncan for long stretches while Manu was destroying our lead one turnover at a time was inexcusable.
There can easily be screens in such a situation. No excuses.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 06-20-2013 at 03:00 AM.
duplicate
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 06-20-2013 at 03:00 AM.
Fortunately, in approximately 1962, some basketball coach in the Midwest devised something called the "switch" whereby the guy defending the screener . . . wait for it . . . switches to the man for whom the screen was set. Thus, even in the worst case, Duncan would be left defending a player who is not shooting, which was Pop's entire point in taking Duncan out. The only difference is that, unlike a Duncan on the bench, the Duncan defending a player who did nothing more than set a screen would at least be in position to, I don't know, . . .
GRAB A ING REBOUND.
You're stupid too, I guess. We only need TD and 4 perimeter defenders. Only Tim, to rebound. But you're stupid so it doesn't matter.
Did you read the part "rotate"?
Read.
One thing I can blame POp for is playing Ginobili too much. Of course you want to give manu as many chance to click as there is but at this point you sit him. Pop would sit Duncan more for his poor play then Gino. No sense.
Mmm...fail.
Since the Spurs were up by 5, they weren't only concerned about three pointers. Holding them to a single shot would make it worth having him on the floor, and Boris Diaw is in no way better at defending the three point line than Duncan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)