Reply With Quote
Sorry. Carry on.
My cat..wait, it's like 3 colors. Now what do I do?!!!111
Sorry. Carry on.
Start by getting her spayed...
Are you all actually watching the trial?
what are you talking about? you said zimmerman was mexican and i just corrected you that zimmerman has a white father.
its obvious zimmerman wasn't going to just let tray "get away" if that was the case he would have stayed his coward ass in the truck like he was directed to. he was on a mission to catch his suspect by any means necessary. trayvon was forced to stand his ground.
well when you are bashing someone's head into concrete and punching them in the face, usually there is scarring or dna. none of which was found on tray's lifeless body.
@ Trill invoking stand your ground. This is hilarious.
Man that is the very post before you spouted off.
I know you are lazy but come on. I don't have enough information to say one way or another. Judge made her decision and I am find with that. It's all that really matters and I have no reason to think she is unfair.You certainly not objective.
Cosmic- Isn’t the prosecution claiming that Zimmerman’s blood was not on Trayvon’s hands & clothing? If that were true that would be rather bizarre, yes?
Tsk tsk tsk. All you see is skin color by this obvious quote.
Not really. I got in a similar fight once in high school. He started it I finished it. He swung and I leaned forward/sideways and it glanced off my forehead...followed with a left hook to the nose, when he staggered back I tripped him, got on his chest with my knees on his biceps pinning his arms...had both hands on his forehead with my thumbs in his eyes...I'd pop the back of his head on the concrete three times and ask him if he was ready to give up...only had to do that twice. Didn't get a drop of blood on me.
damn you really are emotionally invested in zimmerman being found not guilty. if tray was kicking zimmerman's ass to the point he thought he would die, there would be some dna on tray's body, mainly his killer hands....none found.
the law says all zimmerman has to prove he thought his life was in danger, yet his attorney is trying to prove that his life was in danger and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was. his nose wasn't broken and he had a scratch on the back of his head.
so the jury has to be convinced trayvon intended to kill the gun toting vigilante. i don't see the jury buying that but this is amerikkka and it wouldn't surprise me if zimmerman is found not guilty.
^^^^
story is made up
Like I said, you would make a ing terrible attorney. You can't differentiate between what the facts are and what you want them to be.
And you know this how? Again what you WANT the world to be like as opposed to what it IS?
where in that post you quoted did i make up parts of the story of misinterpret the facts? here is what florida state law says about self defense.
It is according to the law:
http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statute...Chapter776/All76.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
i don't think the jury will believe a busted nose and a scratch is enough to determine a person's life was in danger. especially when law enforcement was en route.
because whether "you finished it" or not is irrelevent. plus your history of lying in this thread makes it hard for me to believe anything you say. i wouldn't believe a word out of your mouth if your tounge was notorized.
ing pissant loser.
BTW, It's notarize not notorize loser.
2:10 p.m. ET: Martin's dad lowered his head and said it wasn't his son screaming when detectives first asked him, says West.
"And then, of course, more stuff started to happen in town," said West. He talks about the community reaction starting to build and a lawsuit that was filed to release the 911 call.
"Mr. and Mrs Martin, I'm going to need you to say it was your sons voice on the recording."
2:12 p.m. ET: West says Martin's dad then said it was his son screaming on the 911 call and that Martin's mom agreed.
2:14 p.m. ET: Zimmerman's neighbor said it was Zimmerman screaming on the 911 call, according to West.
Oops!
CC will go down fighting defending zimmerman
Today or future day(s)?
ing pissant loser.
BTW, It's notarize not notorize loser.
look here, all the prosecution has to do is convince the jury that zimmerman wasn't defending himself. he provoked a confrontation while having a loaded weapon on his person and he knew the confrontation would end with him shooting tray, which he did. if the prosecution can do that then they win. if they can't then ya buddy walks away a free man. you resorting to emoticons and calling me a loser is sad at this juncture.
I'm not defending Zimmerman. I have made that clear over and over asshole.
I'm saying that all of you that think Zimmerman is gonna get convicted of second degree murder are kidding yourselves. Ain't gonna happen.
You losers can't even look at the facts of the case logically and see that.
omara is doing a good job at getting the operator to suggest his statements led to zimmerman following trayvon.
Like I said. You would be an awful attorney. You are claiming all sorts of that is not backed up by the facts of the case.
look here, all the prosecution has to do is convince the jury that zimmerman wasn't defending himself. he provoked a confrontation while having a loaded weapon on his person and he knew the confrontation would end with him shooting tray, which he did. if the prosecution can do that then they win. if they can't then ya buddy walks away a free man. you resorting to emoticons and calling me a loser is sad at this juncture.
And yeah, I'm not mad but I do find you to be a boring, stupid piece of .
calm down john wayne... zimmerman was a trigger happy wannabe...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
