The Spurs need to stop throwing picks away with undersized guards.
Nope. The spurs need two things, a good backup pg and another big. The spurs badly need a reliable pg. They lost the series because Pop did not trust the backup pgs on the roster and let Manu piss game 6 away and the 4th quarter of game 7 with turnovers.
The Spurs also need a big but drafting that late you are not going to find one. Better to target the other need in the draft.
The Spurs need to stop throwing picks away with undersized guards.
Doubt Hardaway will be there when the Spurs draft. All the mock drafts I have seen he is gone before. What site did you see Hardaway going to the Spurs?
I think TMac could be the solution at backup PG. They need someone to make the passes TP can't.
TMac is finished and was never a pg. You think manu was bad with turnovers, just watch old TMac as a backup pg.
http://www.cbssports.com/nba/draft/mock-draft
I think I saw him at 28 on Bleacher report or SB nation a few days ago. Most of the sites i've seen has him in the 25-35 range. I also maybe confusing him with Rice Jr.
On the other hand Hardaway is listed as 20th to Chicago on Draft Express but doesn't appear in the1st round on both of CBS's last two mocks its insane how wildly things differ from one mock to another. On one mock I saw Golbert go at number 11 and another I saw OKC take him at #29.
He played PG well his last 3 seasons. He is a natural passer. He'd be better in spot minutes for Kawhi. 12 mpg while Kawhi plays 36.
We hav the oddest assortment of guards in the NBA.
Neal, Mills and De Colo are 2 guards or at best combo guards. Playing them at PG exclusively isn't a great idea.
Joseph is a true PG but has only played consistently in route to a finals appearence. He's either on the bench or lighting it up in the D league.
Mills return is odd and only adds to uncertainty of our backup pg/sg situations. De Colo shows promise, Joseph is entering his 3rd season which means he should be in line for consistent minutes. Neal is too valuable to just let walk but is flawed. He can score in bunches but cant play D.
Drafting a PG isn't ideal. Unless they are bigger guard, who can shoot and attack off the dribble.
They will at least throw a qualifying offer at him its only $1.2 million. a 3 year $10 million deal would be good. But that who throw De Colo, and Josephs future in some doubt.
I can understand the Spurs throwing that offer because he's been there but I'll be okay if he walks away. His defensive skill is lacking and this is an opportunity to get a better defensive SG
We have good PG's already. We need BIGS!
Hill was a good defender. Not sure about his defensive ability.
Corey Joseph looked to be the most reliable of the bunch, yet he regressed because Pop lost faith in his ability to run the offense. , the guy is just in his second year and has to be given the chance to run the team. Therefore, the Spurs can ill afford to spend yet another first round pick on another backup PG. The rotation big is clearly the bigger priority.
draft cheat sheet courtesy of the guys at the wagesofwins (link below)...prospects are grouped into 3 catergories
Great - picked by both of their statistical models (surefire prospects)
Good - picked by one of their statistical models (worth taking a gamble on)
Bust - self explanatory
http://wagesofwins.com/2013/06/27/20...e-cheat-sheet/
Highlights Erick Green as a potentially succesful prospect
Similar to Westbrook.
I've been watching some of his game replays on EPSN online and this kid is damn good. He's not some 25 year old, no passing inaccurate midget gunner like McClinton was. This guy has something legit to his game.
If the Spurs can get him, and develop his left hand and his finishing around the basket, I could see him being moved in another 'Kawhi-type-deal' in about 3 years.
For a player like him, on a bad team and with a green light, he's not selfish at all. The numbers prove it, but this guy does have point skills. He does pass, pretty well. Looks closer to a point guard than Hill did.
He's smaller than Neal, and about as bad a defender, and weaker, but I would love to see him drafted.
Now I don't even think he'll be available, but it is what it is.
Almost every mock draft I've seen has him going in the 2nd round so why do you think he won't be available? I'm about 90% sure he will be available when we pick. Ans I'd much rather draft an athletic wing who can shoot the 3 then another backup PG project.
I say that as a pessimist. One of the hoopsworld guys has Green going to the Pacers in his final mock, and it makes sense, the Pacers had Green in for a 'secret' workout, or rather one that was unpublicized.
I'm about as sick of undersized combo guards as the next guy, and I'd love some athleticism on the wings too. That's a big reason I'd like to see Hanga brought over.
But I think Green can be a dynamic bench scorer who can fill in for Parker and push the ball, and run an offense instead of Manu better than Neal was doing. Manu can't be as effective as he used to be when acting the primary ball-handler when Parker is out or not playing well, and I could see this kid helping there if he's coached up enough.
G.Hill comparison on point, he himself said so.
http://www.nba.com/video/channels/dr...en-profile.nba
I don't want another guard with inconsistent play.
There's no reason to promise an American a draft slot. Promises are to foreigners that you want to stay in the draft.
Agree to some extent. But sometimes you want them to forego workouts with teams just above you in the draft.
Is this guy any better of a player today than Cory Joseph? If not I don't like the pick at all.
I ask this bc I don't really know anything about him. He's listed at 6'3 185 that's basically a similar size as CoJo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)