Reply With Quote
you'll have moved on to making at least 500 more troll accounts for yourself, but yeah, silvermystik has you on bookmark.
"Hey Tim Duncan why don't you sit on the bench like Indiana did to Hibbert so we can win this game."-- Coach Pop
you'll have moved on to making at least 500 more troll accounts for yourself, but yeah, silvermystik has you on bookmark.
Marc Jackson
So you're saying that before the playoffs, you picked that the Spurs would make it all the way to the Finals and wrote at the time that the only reason they'd lose to the heavily favored Heat is because Pop sucks? Good job!
All the Manu fan boys and Popsuckers to the rescue.^^ oh i agree.
But he *redeemed* himself with that tough as nails victory over that dynamo coach Mr Potatoe Head in 2007.
So i am just speaking of his current streak.
Nope, this is what I was right about;So you're saying that before the playoffs, you picked that the Spurs would make it all the way to the Finals and wrote at the time that the only reason they'd lose to the heavily favored Heat is because Pop sucks? Good job!
Last season (2012) I stated that Pop was the biggest obstacle to the spurs winning a le and I asked the question;
"Can the Spurs win a le - in spite of Pop?"
Pop got worked by scotti brooks in 2012 - so I was right - even though i got flamed and all the popsuckers got their panties all twisted up...
Fast forward to 2013 - and all the Popsuckers kept bumping that thread when it looked like the Spurs were about to win a le - WITH POP at the helm....
until...
Pop happened.
So I was right - yet again.
Now I am telling you that Doc Rivers will work Pop in the playoffs NEXT YEAR. And I will be right again.
Kinda sucks to be right - but Pop is the gift that keeps on giving.
I am your newest fan. You seem like you have very realistic perspective when it comes to the Spurs, just like myself.
So you made a prediction -- Spurs don't win the 2013 le -- that if it were a bet in Vegas, it would pay out something like 1:50 odds? Don't quit your day job, Nostradamus.
Hey he's not a homer like most of you Popsuckers and Manu fan boys that have a "lets stay pat, no changes needed, offer Manu a $7M contract, Tiago a $10M contract, and develop CoJo" at ude.
You are not very bright are you?
Two years in a row - I said that POP would up the Spurs chances for a le - and the Spurs would have to win IN SPITE OF POP.
Scotti Brooks - all of 16 years old - puts Sefalosha on Parker - and Pop s the in bed- after young Scotti spots Pop two games.
Next year all the Popsuckers are frothing at the mouth and their vaginas are moist with "pop-love" and what happens?
Pop s the bed in game 6.
I am giving you a free long-range prediction for next year and you are sitting here with your pop-suckin-thumb up your ass and talking about vegas odds?
Just stop before you embarrass yourself further.
Thanks- TGY - but - Blake is my biggest fan - he has bumped about 100 of my posts/threads - but unfortunately for him - it backfired - and he looked stupid when...
yup....you guessed it....
POP HAPPENED!
Since you can (and you do) always blame anything bad that happens on the coach, you have produced a hypothesis that is only falsifiable in the event that the Spurs win a le.
Spurs go 20-62? It's Pop's fault for [fill in the blank]. Spurs lose in the first round? Pop's fault. Lose in the WCFs? Pop's fault? Kawhi Leonard misses a free throw to secure a le? Pop's fault. Get swept? Pop's fault. Take it to 7? Pop's fault. The team plane crashes? Pop's fault.
LMAO I like how you mentioned Kawhi's missed free throw instead of Manu's 8 legendary turnovers and Pop tin* the bed in Game 6. You sure are blind as fuc*. Can you make your love for Pop and Manu any more obvious?
If you could see- you would see what has happened in
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
You can also see how Pop is keeping Bonner - rather than looking for a "player"
If you cannot see the dementia in progress with coach Pop - you will never see.
Spurs fans are grateful for 4 rings under Pop because they don't feel they deserve more. I am pissed that - because of Pop - the Spurs don't have 6-7- or 8 rings under Tim Duncan.
All you have to do is watch the games and watch the coaching.
There are a million different things that would have changed the outcome of that game given how close it was. If Ray Allen has a bad burrito for lunch, we're probably the champions. No one thing is the sole or primary "cause". Nevertheless, it is true that regardless of everything that happened before, if Kawhi hits that free throw, we win.
The reason the spurs contend year after year is that they build on what they have already developed. Their roster is very flexible and easily adaptable due to the FO's forward thinking in how they acquire and sign players/draftpicks
You essentially build on what works and add pieces that make the team better. If you want to swing fo the fences in every draft, FA period you will ultimately turn into a perenial lottery bound team that is consistently pedalling the "rebuilding the team" mantra...see bobcats, twolves, bucks
This "championship sustainability" that the spurs have developed is unique and is exactly what sets them apart from the rest of the poorly run franchises in the NBA. My advice would be for you to lay off the fertiliser beacuse the grass isn't necessarily greener on the other side.
You need to come to the realisation that it is extremely hard to contend every year, let alone win a championship ...I'm sure the teams we played in the playoffs during our championship runs could all say similar things about their coaching and how they could pinpoint key plays where they feel their chances had been dashed.
Band-aid solutions and knee-jerk reactions don't fix the problem, and only cause further headaches down the road
Welp, the OP was wrong about 2014.
And happy to be so.
Otherwise....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
