Reply With Quote
yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh, I wanted him back but was praying for a lower number.
DRIVE FOR FIVE
2014 CHAMPS LETS GOOOO!!!!!!
yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh, I wanted him back but was praying for a lower number.
Where are you getting that number? Unless they amnesty Bonner there is a little less than 1M to play with.
Just give it up bro it's over.
Yeah, and why don't you go to your employer and demand to make 28% less than they are willing to pay you.
It really isn't that unexpected, IMO... as I said before, Tim cut his max salary from 20 to 10, Manu just did the same going from 14 to 7...
whether it's fair or not, well, im sure everyone has their own opinion...
lol gtfo
At this point, we're better off using the MLE and maybe trading Bonner as an expiring contract.
How much money left now?
i love manu but hes not worth that much, please tell me the spurs are still lokiing to add another playmaker and not a summer league prospect
No difference between 5M per and 7M per. MLE is all that's left in either case and the Spurs will be well under the lux tax even if they use the full MLE.
According to Bruno, about 6M with Bonner amnestied and Neal gone.
I believe the MLE is only available if you go over the cap number. They would have to resign Neal or someone else (if it's allowed) to get over it.
Tiago should have gotten seven as well max, especially if they were going to give him 4 years...
Not true. Spurs have the MLE at there disposal.
If they are under the cap by an amount lower than the MLE, they can use the MLE or the cap space.
It's kind of funny reading all the posts advocating replacing Manu, and then reading all the posts complaining that Manu should have taken less for the good of the team...i don't think its the same people making both of those points, but still...
Trash. Manu is past done.
The main problem with tosb Manu is Pop still believing he's the third option, the problem with prime Splitter is that he's a worse playoff performer than Bonner...
If Spurs are somewhat logical with themselves, they won't re-sign Neal. If you spend $7M per year on a player, the expectation is that he is a productive player.
Do we still have the LLE?
My bad. Thanks for clearing that up.
I thought he was gonna take a pay cut, what the ?
I think this is the point where the FA market will get interesting for the Spurs... I don't think they're done dealing yet, but at this point I think they've done what they wanted to do as far as the talent they wanted to retain
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
