Your boy was a ing molester outed by his own gotdam cousin
I've posted facts irrefutable evidence you can see and read for yourself outside of my own views..you and your friends have done no such thing...you guys are nothing but a gang of weak ass sheeple....it's hilarious to watch you think you're regulating me....I'm an arrogant just like my idol Kobe but I'm smarter than every single one of you ers
Your boy was a ing molester outed by his own gotdam cousin
You guys just can't ever get right...supporting a molesting, murdering, wife beating, police assaulting bean---her![]()
Man...I'm having my own ing "own an ass party" up in this !!!
Remind me of your irrefutable evidence that definitively proves Zimmerman is guilty of 2nd degree murder
...How Do I know Zim was the aggressor?...Simply put because he was following Trayvon...by default that makes you the aggressor...here's how you know he's guilty of 1st degree murder in my book:Simple...Motive
911: Are you following him?
Zimmerman: Yes
Sean Hannity: Were you following him?
Zimmerman: No
^ Basic and simple lie...all it takes is one single thread of sperm to fertilize an egg...ya dig?
Motive: Violent past includes:
arrest for violent assault of a police offer (If he's willing to violently assault a cop Trayvon didn't stand a chance)![]()
domestic abuse of his previous girlfriend who had to get a restraining order
molesting his own cousin
Your in a hole....but the first lie is physical evidence...everything else is corroborating evidence as to his wicked character and nature
let me know when you've had enough of me anally wrecking you...this thread is legendary![]()
And Kirby is a rapist with fat 30 mil contract. Does this prove any point ?
stay on point will ya..what Z being a molester proves is that he has a very wicked character....but I noticed how you contentedly left out his violently attacking a police officer and violent domestic abuse case against his ex girlfriend...very slick of you not to mention those KEY pieces that speak to who the real thug was........violence against cops, beating up his fiance, molesting his cousin, murdering a teen...gotdam what's next
Yea we talk about all issues that our race faces and give back to the community in a variety of ways.
far as the go to rebuttal of blacks selling slaves, thats somr bull and I don't believe it. If you were familiar with the trans athletic slave trade you would know better.
Burden of proof was on the prosecution, son...not the defense. You don't seem to understand how this works. Are you denying Trayvon beat the out of him? If someone was doing that to you, and you had a gun, and you kept having your face slammed into the concrete, are you gonna shoot him before he kills you? Damn right you are. He should have stayed in his car, yes. No question. But there's no law in following someone unless you act. Trayvon acted...and beat the out of Zimmerman. Not saying GZ should have done it, but I guarantee you this, if I was in that situation, and it was coming down to me or him dying, it's gonna be him. I don't see any evidence of anything racial in anything you say, son. That neighborhood had 8 burglaries in the 15 months prior to the Martin situation by young black males. That's why they had a neighborhood watch in the first place. HE HELPED A BLACK HOMELESS MAN AGAINST THE SAME POLICE! Funny thing is, he asked for help from the NAACP, and they shot him down, saying they didn't have the resources to help him.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/07/wh...rge-zimmerman/
His quote, while he was fighting the police about the beating?
“I would just like to state that the law is written in black and white. It should not and cannot be enforced in the gray for those that are in the thin blue line.”
They love Zimmerman, kool. I told rhinestone cowboy that he was a pedophile who molested his own cousin and can you believe he said wo what, prove it? I feel sorry for his daughter.
He'll just toss them all thru a bar window.
I don't think he shouldn't have gotten convicted of murder, but a better prosecution would have convicted him on manslaughter. The prosecution didn't do a good job at all. They just made a ty case and gave the jury no choice but to give a not guilty verdict.
In fact, maybe they gave the case away.
http://nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2..._most-comments
Those Daily Caller writers are l-a-c-k-i-n-g..I've been to the site it's a cheap knock off of Huffington Post...
The Burden is on the Prosecution....and they did a poor job...doesn't mean based on all the evidence that we know of... much of which was ruled inadmissible provides clear proof of Z's guilt...The jury received the same information I received regarding facts of the case..except I got to see everything whereas the jury was deprived of a ton of that shows motive, intent, and the violent history of Zim...the real question you should be asking yourself is this:
If Zim approached Trayvon at night and Tray had a gun could Trayvon shoot and kill Zim for merely approaching or walking up to him....be careful in how you answer because it's a question that is a win win for me no matter how you slice but let me see if you're intellectual enough to see what I'm doing to you![]()
I'll be honest, bro...I'm on the side that says GZ should have kept his ass in the car. I just get tired of everyone saying this was racial. Black or white, yellow or brown, if someone's beating my ass and slamming my face into concrete, and I feel my life is threatened, I'm taking them out. Zim was hispanic and white, yet everyone keeps calling him white. He also spent several years with two black girls living in his house, stood up for a black homeless person, and tried to do more for him, but was turned down for help by the NAACP...does that sound like a racist? Was he wrong for getting out of his car? Maybe...but that place had been robbed 8 times in 15 months by young black males...he felt worried...all he did was follow him. Maybe he shouldn't have, but if it was my house in the neighborhood, I can't say I wouldn't do the same. Could you?
Yep....dude ing round with his own lil cousin..and these bas s supporting him....they have no moral ground to stand on in supporting this guy.,.it's wonderful watching these racist Spur fans go down in flames like this
Naw I wouldn't follow a stranger. I don't think trayvon was doing anything su ious but walking whioe black. Once I found out cowardman was a wife beating pedophile he lost what little respect I had for him. Dude is a monster.
Kool...first off, Daily Caller isn't the only place you can find those stories..it's just the first one I grabbed. Second, if you really want to play this game, then yeah, he probably could have shot him. The way the stupid ass Stand your Ground laws are, he probably would have gotten away with it. And honestly, he probably would have done it, as the only racist one that night seemed to be Trayvon, calling Zim a "creepy cracker." But if you want to compare one guy approaching another to a guy getting his ass beat, and saying it's the same case, you're out of your mind. I think the Stand your Ground law needs to change...and I think Trayvon should still be alive today..I'm just saying this wasn't about race. I'm saying this was one guy who shot another guy because he felt his life was threatened. Zim was probably worried because of all the burglaries by young black males, but he still should have stayed in his car. I'm not defending GZ for getting out of the car and following..I'm defending him for fighting back when he thought he was going to die.
yeah like Trayvon had the latest HOA report on burglaries in the neighborhood he was visiting
...you guys as dumb as in your rationale...he aggressively stalked, not followed but stalked the kid...Trayvon started running away (while still on the phone with his girlfriend) and Zim's running in pursuit to find him..it's called aggressive pursuit ok numnuts...Zim thought Tray was a criminal so if he's willing to chase him down...what makes you think he stopped there? especially when he has his weapon and has a violent assault criminal history? According to Ms Jeantel Trayvon said get off and that's the last thing she heard..it's pretty ing cut and dry to me...Zim's actions (aggressive pursuit) actually PROVES Racheal Jeantel's account tbh
a) there was no motive to murder
b) following somebody is not a crime, nor was it enough to be considered being an aggressor in the court of law
c) giving a different story isn't evidence of murder or aggression
d) violent past doesn't matter because Martin equally fits the bill due to his own aggressive history
e) violent past isn't a motive. the violent past wasn't allowed as evidence by the court for either party, so you can stop bringing that up as evidence
however, evidence that suggests martin initiated the fight:
1) only 2 injuries on martin. a bullet wound, and bruised knuckles
2) zimmerman was beat the up. lacerations on the back of his head point to having it beaten on or against pavement
I don't have respect for GZ either..but I have respect for him defending his right to live. Whether he deserves to live for his past discretions is one thing. But you can't take that into consideration as a juror. GZ wasn't racist...going by other people he was a monster, though...I will agree. He shouldn't have gotten out of his car, but he did...didn't mean Trayvon should have attacked him. And Trayvon was being racist himself...calling GZ a "creepy cracker." Are you ok with that?
She also said he called him a "Creepy Cracker." Sounds racist to me. Yes, he pursued him...and yes, he was wrong for that. But it was Martin who attacked...and continued attacking. At that point, it came down to a him or me scenario. Life or death, which do you choose? Zim chose life. Zim should be in jail, but not for murder.
Listen up kid....You don't get to chase down a lion and then proceed to say ohh wait my my life is in danger....If he thought his life was in danger he would have have "AGGRESSIVELY CHASED"...he wasn't worried about a dam thing because he was ready to shoot the guy...there is nothing in Z's past that warrants giving him the benefit of the doubt after he chased the kid down...you guys are clearly not living in the REAL world..your views further show that you've never been in any type of / altercation, or scuffle in your lives..No one who has talk in this theorized and superficial manner that you guys do..yall are living in a ing peter pan society...very strange all of you fellas
creepy ass* cracka*
but no, racial slurs aren't racist if it's said by a minority, apparently
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)