Reply With Quote
more guns = more gun violence, more gun crimes, more gun suicides, more spousal murders, more arguments won by a gun.
less, sicko gun fellators, GFY
your thoughts on the manual?
more guns = more gun violence, more gun crimes, more gun suicides, more spousal murders, more arguments won by a gun.
less, sicko gun fellators, GFY
and there are more accidental gun deaths than there are home invaders killed by home defenders.
you gun fellators are nothing but sales shills for the guns and ammo industry.
your thoughts on the manual?
I don't need no steekin propaganda manual
Gun-Safety Instructor Shoots Student
http://www.gunnews.com/gun-safety-in...hoots-student/
ing gun fellators, what a bunch of industry-shilling, simple-minded, ing ass-clowns. And lot of these bubbas, think, like bankster Lloyd Blankfein, that they're doing God's work!
But your "arguments" are taken right from it
You ARE the fear mongering manual.
my arguments are the FACTS of America polluted with 300M guns, in spite of NRA/gun industry bribing Congress to forbid govt research into to violence and gun crimes.But your "arguments" are taken right from it
taken right from page 25 of the fear mongering manual
#s 2 and 3 have the exact same wording. 3's actual wording is either missing or corrupted.This is unbelievable
A guide to dance on the graves of those killed in mass shootings
#1: DON’T HESITATE TO SPEAK OUT.
There can be a tendency to adopt a quiet “wait and see” at ude when a high-profile gun violence incident happens. The truth is, the most powerful time to communicate is when concern and emotions are running at their peak. While we always want to be respectful of the situation, a self-imposed period of silence is never necessary
#2: EXPRESS CONCERN FOR VICTIMS (WITHOUT A “BUT”).
#3: DON’T ASSUME THE FACTS – AND DON’T WAIT FOR THEM.
It’s appropriate to open with an expression of concern for the victims and their families.
“No family should ever have to go through what the families of these victims are going through right now. Our hearts go out to them.”
However, all too often, such expressions of sympathy are followed by a “but” statement. (But, the real issue here is . . . But, what we have to focus on is . . .But, what I want to draw your attention to is . . . etc.)
That has two negative consequences. The “but” makes the expression of concern seem less heartfelt and more like something we had to get out of the way before getting to what we really wanted to say. “But” can be read as a way for the speaker to say “I didn’t really mean what I just said.”
And, the “but” breaks the link between the violence people are shocked by and the next thing we’re about to say. Our goal is to establish that link, not break it.
So, we need to use language where our message flows from the expression of concern into our broader argument. It can’t be an abrupt pivot. In these situations, expressions such as “look,” “actually,” and “that’s why” work a lot better than “but.”
#3: DON’T ASSUME THE FACTS – AND DON’T WAIT FOR THEM.
It’s appropriate to open with an expression of concern for the victims and their families.
“No family should ever have to go through what the families of these victims are going through right now. Our hearts go out to them.”
However, all too often, such expressions of sympathy are followed by a “but” statement. (But, the real issue here is . . . But, what we have to focus on is . . .But, what I want to draw your attention to is . . . etc.)
That has two negative consequences. The “but” makes the expression of concern seem less heartfelt and more like something we had to get out of the way before getting to what we really wanted to say. “But” can be read as a way for the speaker to say “I didn’t really mean what I just said.”
And, the “but” breaks the link between the violence people are shocked by and the next thing we’re about to say. Our goal is to establish that link, not break it.
So, we need to use language where our message flows from the expression of concern into our broader argument. It can’t be an abrupt pivot. In these situations, expressions such as “look,” “actually,” and “that’s why” work a lot better than “but.”
“Losing a child, a mother or a husband is every family’s worst nightmare. That’s why we have to tell our political leaders we won’t wait for the next tragedy before they act to prevent the gun violence that’s tearing people’s lives apart.”
Experience tells us that the specific facts of a high-profile gun incident are revealed over time. If we jump to conclusions about those details, we could find ourselves at odds with reality as events unfold.
So, the smartest thing to do is avoid linking our message and arguments to any one set of partially-revealed facts. We shouldn’t assume the facts.
But, we also shouldn’t argue ourselves into inaction while we await clarity about details.
The clearest course is to advance our core message about preventing gun violence independent of facts that may shift on us over time. (“While we don’t know the specifics of this tragedy, we know far too many people are killed by weak gun laws in this country.”)
Of course, once a fact is clearly established, it makes sense to rely on it to advance your case
#4: ASK HARD QUESTIONS.
One way to link our arguments to an event without being trapped by shifting cir stances is to ask questions – ones that point to approaches and policies that we favor, but that resonate with special emotional power at the time of a high-profile shooting.
Where did the gun come from? Did the shooter have to undergo a background check before he got the gun? Did the shooter have a permit for the gun? Did the shooter own more than one gun? Did he have high capacity ammunition magazines with him? How many rounds did he have on him? Did the shooter have to observe any kind of waiting period before he got his hands on the guns? Or did he get them right away no questions asked?
[QUOTE=TSA;6804533]
here's another one: the NRA/gun industry forbids: ATF cannot keep anything but paper records of guns, no computerized records.
I challenge you to back up the claim you made above. Fortunately it's falsifiable and quite easily so: I bought two guns, ergo I now have 2 more than I had before. I did not kill anyone nor did I commit suicide. What number of guns would I need to own in order for me to be forced into killing someone or committing suicide?
The truth is that more people = more murder and more suicides. Since we all have the right to take our own lives, suicides should not factor into any gun control discussions. Bridges and a rafter play as large a role in the suicide as a gun could, but the largest role is played by the mental health of the individual committing the act.
So your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to back up your claim by showing how an increase in guns = an increase in murders and suicides.
Not true. There exists a law against having a government database for registering guns. That's not the same as saying "records of guns". You can find all kinds of gun records on the ATF database, just nothing that registers a particular gun with the purchaser. That's all done on paper for a reason that you wouldn't get since the only freedom you seem to value is the one to run your mouth.
Why the is the cold dead hands crew back? Was there another incident of a bunch of first graders getting mowed down by semi auto weapons?
Didn't read the manual.
majority of America shares out views brother. The rest of us don't want to see your home life applied large scale to the entire US getting plowed in the butt by fascist dictators tbh. It's about self preservation that's it.
try me, bubba.
tbh how do you feel about every prominent gun grabber (Bloomberg, Feinstein, etc) all being Jewish?
False premise.
early 1900s in Russia weren't false tho IMHO. 20 million Christians slaughtered..that's the real holocaust. Y'all just want a repeat I'm on to you...
You're kind of dumb tbh.
Well no, you're still here.
Awesome Jewish rebuttal brah. Was that one kosher aided?
Seriously? You should have left your ST chips cashed in. ^ this is garbage.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions