Reply With Quote
My best guess is they don't want to distribute a blueprint on how to destroy a similar building before everyone gets a chance to retrofit. Feel free to post the assumptions and data for your theory.
I will wait.
Chump?NIST
Release the data...If NIST is so sure that they finally got WTC7 right, then why not release the data they used to make their assumptions.
My best guess is they don't want to distribute a blueprint on how to destroy a similar building before everyone gets a chance to retrofit. Feel free to post the assumptions and data for your theory.
I will wait.
Yeah, that's my reaction when you post anything about 9/11 since you haven't posted any theory that could contradict the accepted course of events after eleven years of your so called "research."
You have nothing, dan.
Nade y pues nada y pues nada.
Great.
In the very likely event you didn't actually watch the video, it said to "Use these facts to decide for yourself what really happened on
September 11th 2001."
Using those facts from that YouTube and all your other surely extensive research over the past 11+ years, what did you decide for yourself happened on September 11th 2001?
Chump stop trying to be mayor Giuliani of the politics forum and show some respect for the dead.
Straw man.
You posted a video that said "Use these facts to decide for yourself what really happened on September 11th 2001."
So what did you decide for yourself what really happened on 9/11?
your safety word?
Stop making them and I will stop calling you out on them.
75,518 post and no pussy
SA210 will never post about 9/11 again.
He would rather spend all his time posting about me.
11,129 posts and no theory.
I gave my theory. The govt did it, in the same way they planned Operation Northwoods. But still, he got no pussy
OK, how? Let's discuss 9/11 and not me for a change.See? Bet you could never do it.But still, he got no pussy
The crash into the Pentagon is the one that makes me scratch my head. The one video of it happens so fast yet the plane that crashed into it seems so small.
We're winning...
http://exopermaculture.com/2013/08/2...ts-guess-what/
Our government has been releasing a lot of information in the last week or two to keep ahead of Snowden and Greenwald. They are attempting to beat them to the punch. They believe it is better to release it with their own spin than to wait for Greenwald or someone else to release it. The UK has threatened or may already have destroyed some of the hard drive information, as reported a couple of days ago....If the UK government can control the Guardian, they can work with our intelligence to release the information they want to release before Greenwald has a chance...Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.
The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.
Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”
Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”
There is a lot of information that neither government wants to be released. They are attempting to stop the information at the source. It will be interesting to see what the NYTimes does with their new accessibility....
You can't be winning when you can't even say what you think really happened on 9/11.
Twelve years, dan.
Twelve.
Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”
Yes, that's the standard cop out you adopted years ago.
What has changed?
lol internet comments
The 'I know you are but what am I' defense. THEY HAVE THEIR OWN CONSPIRACY THEORY.
I gave my theory. The govt did it, in the same way they planned Operation Northwoods. But still, he got no pussy
"You know they did it" is less a theory than a vacuous pla ude.
If it were so blindingly obvious and concrete, you asshats wouldn't have quite as much trouble putting forth things that go into theories, like, you know, evidence 'n' stuff.
What evidence do you have of this pla ude?
It would seem to follow that if the government is lying about the facts of 911, then it would be involved, since if it was another third party they would let us know what country they lived in so we could invade it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
