Reply With Quote
smh TT
When did you become dumb, Blakes? I was responding to your post about percentages. 68% sucks considering the fact that these first two weeks were pretty easy. That won't change if I (or whoever finishes 1st) finishes with a lower percentage since the picks will only get tougher.
smh TT
So to be clear, you're making up rules of what sucks and when.
smh lol utsa
Nah, its just common sense. Much fewer gimmes during conference play. No more P5 vs G5 (UTSA vs Ok State for example) or FBS vs FCS (TT vs SFA) for example. Anything else I need to explain for you, Blakes?
smh lol TT
utsa plays Arizona this week. At Arizona
TT plays Texas State in two weeks
Explain why you and other utsa nuts are so stupid.
Smh smh utsa per par
Last edited by Blake; 09-12-2013 at 07:50 AM.
aggy
TCU at Texas Tech*
UCLA at Nebraska
Fresno State at Colorado
Vanderbilt at South Carolina
Washington at Illinois
Boston College at USC
Tennessee at Oregon
Alabama at Texas A&M
Iowa at Iowa State
Mississippi State at Auburn
Georgia Tech at Duke
Oregon State at Utah
UTSA at Arizona
Ole Miss at Texas
Wisconsin at Arizona State
Did I say OOC games ended after Week 2? Youre talking about the rest of the season and theres a whole lot more conference games left than there is OOC games. Why do I have to continuously explain simple things to you, Blakes?
smh smh TT per par
no more means no more. Problem here is that there are more.
you're stupid.
Smh utsa.
What was the sentence before that one? Next time Ill be sure to specify that conference play doesnt start the exact same week for everybody. Its common knowledge but not for Blakes I guess.
smh TT
Last edited by FkLA; 09-12-2013 at 11:46 AM.
FkLA - why does every thread turn into a UTSA or an arguing-with-someone thread?
Wut. You were the one that said Utsa was done playing the big schools, not me. You were wrong. You're still wrong. You were stupid about it. You're still stupid about it.
Just keep making up your own lolutsa rules of what suck means.
Smh utsa
I actually think its quite funny that only the suckers in ST do the LOL Utsa thingy. Most reputable websites, and sports authorities/figures are amazed at how fast the Utsa program has progressed. They are amazed at the numbers we dump on established programs. SWT has been around almost 100yrs and we dumped on that ass. Utsa dropped 35 on OSU....... regardless if it was their 1st, 2nd, or 3rd string. , Miss St. could only get 3 on em. So thats why we retaliate. Maybe we shouldnt though, because our progress and play on the field s on these got in ST.
smh butthurt utsaI actually think its quite funny that only the suckers in ST do the LOL Utsa thingy. Most reputable websites, and sports authorities/figures are amazed at how fast the Utsa program has progressed. They are amazed at the numbers we dump on established programs. SWT has been around almost 100yrs and we dumped on that ass. Utsa dropped 35 on OSU....... regardless if it was their 1st, 2nd, or 3rd string. , Miss St. could only get 3 on em. So thats why we retaliate. Maybe we shouldnt though, because our progress and play on the field s on these got in ST.
The talkers..........Flake, Kermit, Phillip and a number of gots have self owned themselves. Utsa wont be FBS for 25yrs, they wont even beat an FCS team for another 5. Utsa will never have a winning record. Utsa will never score a touchdown on an a BigXII school..............What a bunch of wrong ass es these dumbasses are. LMAO at how ing wrong they have been. Its really not even argue worthy.
How can I be butthurt when Utsa has excelled. You should be butthurt for failing at everything got.
TCU at Texas Tech
UCLA at Nebraska
Fresno State at Colorado
Vanderbilt at South Carolina
Washington at Illinois
Boston College at USC
Tennessee at Oregon
Alabama at Texas A&M
Iowa at Iowa State
Mississippi State at Auburn
Georgia Tech at Duke
Oregon State at Utah
UTSA at Arizona
Ole Miss at Texas
Wisconsin at Arizona State
I'm surprised at the number of people betting on TCU - should be a fun game tonight, and a good kick off to a solid weekend of football.
Alphas always get challenged tbh. Thats why everyone tries to pick fights with FkLA imho.
So Im a UTSA 'homer' yet I didnt know UTSA played Arizona this Saturday? The sentence before the one you quoted was talking about conference play. It doesnt take a genius to figure out what I meant. Doesnt even matter if you want to play stupid and get technical though...the fact remains that there will be a whole lot more conference play from now to the end of the season than there will be P5 vs G5/FBS vs FCS. Im still right regardless. Youre wrong.
smh TT
Will it be nationally televised or shown in SA? Not talking about TT if its not being shown nationally either, genuinely asking cause Id like to watch the game tbh.
It's going to be a good one for sure. I think Patterson will come up with something defensively that your QB hasn't seen and might give him some trouble. Patterson needs to try to take away those quick throw /screen routes that Tech is running to death and make that QB beat them deep. Maybe the QB is capable beating them deep also though, I'm not sure.
It's on ESPN
I think Patterson will come out defensively with the same scheme he had in 2006 when they held Tech without a touchdown winning 12-3. This was of course the meeting after tech almost put up 70 points to slaughter them the previous time.
TCU's dual threat Boykin will be a handful tonight, and a true test for our defense - Wreck em!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions