Reply With Quote
You are so full of if you calim you are citing physics. I do see a whole lot of mystic, spiritual faith based nonsense. The sbm comparison accordingly is apt.
How is that relevant? You don't put much stock into what scientists say, going by this thread.
You are so full of if you calim you are citing physics. I do see a whole lot of mystic, spiritual faith based nonsense. The sbm comparison accordingly is apt.
What is the SBM comparison? That a new term?
It means "Silver Be' Mean" to me and he is in my head even when I am addressing other posters!
No, it means "Sniveling Beta Male"...
This is how you discuss? You resort to ridicule?
Does it give you some sort of superior feeling?
I never said I was citing physics in this forum, that was your claim.
Does it massage your ego to tell someone you don't even know that they are full of ?
That is sad. You don't know me. And you barely know what I think, rather just a little I've posted in this forum.
I refuse to get into pissing contests with you, but apparently you had your toes sticking out and I stepped on them. Otherwise why the animosity?
Your insults will only backfire back on you and make you look foolish and childish, sorry.
Good luck with that type of discussing.
It's not for me. I prefer humor, thank you very much.
That's his schtick. To be a pretentious wannabe academic who attempts to sound smart by googling material that's being discussed then chiming several vanilla takes.This is how you discuss? You resort to ridicule?
Does it give you some sort of superior feeling?
I never said I was citing physics in this forum, that was your claim.
Does it massage your ego to tell someone you don't even know that they are full of ?
That is sad. You don't know me. And you barely know what I think, rather just a little I've posted in this forum.
I refuse to get into pissing contests with you, but apparently you had your toes sticking out and I stepped on them. Otherwise why the animosity?
Your insults will only backfire back on you and make you look foolish and childish, sorry.
Good luck with that type of discussing.
It's not for me. I prefer humor, thank you very much.
Lol then his go to move is claiming logical fallacy at the beginning so watch out for that.
did I forget, he knows fluid mechanics and topology! He's a jack of all trades!
If you feel that way then you shouldn't be here else take your head out of the sand.I never said I was citing physics in this forum, that was your claim.
It doesn't massage me ego. As I have stated before, I am discouraging what I am ridiculing. It's called negative reinforcement. It works for all of your comments about it backfiring.
I have nothing against you personally. As you said I do not know you. That does not mean that you suddenly do base your theories on physics, make your denial of having said that true, or make your posts be full of less mystical nonsense.
That's his schtick. To be a pretentious wannabe academic who attempts to sound smart by googling material that's being discussed then chiming several vanilla takes.
Lol then his go to move is claiming logical fallacy at the beginning so watch out for that.
did I forget, he knows fluid mechanics and topology! He's a jack of all trades!
I haven't talked about that for months so I must have made quite the impression on you. Tell us how you really feel.
I don't claim a fallacy is made typically; I point out the fallacy in and of itself without calling it that. My move this time was to claim that he doesn't base his theories on physics. He responded by saying he didn't do that.
I am definitely arrogant. I think I have reason to be. I understand multivariable calculus, PDEs, topology, stochastics, and harmonic analysis. Most people have difficulty beyond simple algebra and I have no issues in the highest of mathematics.
Simple logical proofs like application of laws or obvious causality are obvious.
I think the issue that people have is that I treat them with little respect. We have been posting here for a long time. By we I mean the ones that I am going back and forth with. Half of them are about two people that post on multiple accounts. Most of the reason why I give little respect though is because I see a methodology based on bias rather and logic and ideology as opposed to empiricism. And when people are intentionally misleading then I am hostile.
When I see it, I point it out and when people condescend me then I return it right back in kind.
All of that being said, I will admit when I am wrong. For example, elbamba was right and I was wrong as regards to self defense and presumption in the state of FL. There are all kinds of times I have been incorrect. That being said, I am not going to be persuaded by emotional appeal, bluster, or simpleminded bull . If that makes me an asshole then so be it.
I'm sure your support is so meaningful to them....
That's what they all do, they all retort to name calling. They claim superiority and dismiss you as uniformed. Not 1 link of a transitional fossil or of how humans came to be. Human Origins site still claims that they do not know. Yet all of the atheist here accept evolution as fact when in fact it cannot be proven. I ask once again, has anyone actually observed evolution? Can I provide proof of God? No, I can't. But can anyone provide proof of evolution?
I am definitely arrogant. I think I have reason to be. I understand multivariable calculus, PDEs, topology, stochastics, and harmonic analysis. Most people have difficulty beyond simple algebra and I have no issues in the highest of mathematics.
Simple logical proofs like application of laws or obvious causality are obvious.
I think the issue that people have is that I treat them with little respect. We have been posting here for a long time. By we I mean the ones that I am going back and forth with. Half of them are about two people that post on multiple accounts. Most of the reason why I give little respect though is because I see a methodology based on bias rather and logic and ideology as opposed to empiricism. And when people are intentionally misleading then I am hostile.
When I see it, I point it out and when people condescend me then I return it right back in kind.
All of that being said, I will admit when I am wrong. For example, elbamba was right and I was wrong as regards to self defense and presumption in the state of FL. There are all kinds of times I have been incorrect. That being said, I am not going to be persuaded by emotional appeal, bluster, or simpleminded bull . If that makes me an asshole then so be it.
All of this has been linked for you. The Smithsonian had all of that. It's like the only thing you will take is a skeleton from every generation dating all the way back to australopithecus.
They have like 1 fossil of a supposed whale with webbed feet and that's proof?
Actually I got a
If characterizing me like that makes you feel better then so be it. All that is coming across to me from you is a remarkable inferiority complex.Actually I got a
Nothing screams inferiority complex like typing up the response you did not to mention your frequent going around ridiculing people's intellect. For as smart as you claim to be, you walked right into this.
That's his schtick. To be a pretentious wannabe academic who attempts to sound smart by googling material that's being discussed then chiming several vanilla takes.
Lol then his go to move is claiming logical fallacy at the beginning so watch out for that.
did I forget, he knows fluid mechanics and topology! He's a jack of all trades!
You also with the pretentious claims.
What, is this how you discuss opinions?
You are aware of the difference between opinions and facts, right?
Geeez, there sure are a lot of over defensive posters here tonight.
What's up with that?
Again with the ridicule, and this time with baseless accusations mixed in?
How do you get anything accomplished if all you can resort to are insults and ridiculous accusations?
Do you even realize how foolish you are making yourself look? Do you even care?
All you have discouraged is others taking you seriously. I hope you at least realize that, because it doesn't take rocket science or a degree in physics to see that.
The man asked for what my background was, yet somehow you misinterpreted my answer to be a huge put down of you? Otherwise why the insulting remarks? I can't help that, it isn't my problem if that bothers you, it is yours. It is what it is.
You are free to label all you like, but it won't change anything with me.
Bash away if that tickles your fancy.
I find it mildly amusing, and just a bit childish.
If you could have added a little humor you might have made it more palatable.
Good luck with all that!
What I walked into?Nothing screams inferiority complex like typing up the response you did not to mention your frequent going around ridiculing people's intellect. For as smart as you claim to be, you walked right into this.
If you say so. What is obvious is that I am in your head. You came out of nowhere asshurt like no tomorrow in an effort to call me out. Either that or you are on a troll. You can never tell around here. Either way, it's not as if you are revealing something.
There is this though. About half of the population is below average intelligence. There are stupid people out there. Now I do not just call people stupid. I say so in a reaction to stupid things they say or exhibit. I point out specific examples of why I feel that. There are objective measurements of intelligence. Memory, logic, critical thinking, understanding of complex ideas, etc. That is what I point to.
That you take such issue with that does reveal something about you whether you like it or not. As I said, it screams inferiority complex.
was galvanized even referring to you xmas?
fuzzy still getting shat on
He is tap dancing like ten mother ers on speed tryin' to weasel out of it!!!!
Nope - he was ting on fuzzy got
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
