Reply With Quoteyour grade school level of insults speaks to the truth of your supposed writing career and underscores how you are incapable of arguing on merit.
your grade school level of insults speaks to the truth of your supposed writing career and underscores how you are incapable of arguing on merit.
^troll pussy ^ wants to run to the e gang for support ^ what a pussy ^
Let me guess.... He is still obsessed with Constantine... Guy sounds like a spurned gay lover stuck in a time warp.
He just ran to the "so what's the deal thread" to try an gather support against me - pathetic pussy!!!
I think that the guy who commissioned the first bibles was pretty fundamental to the formation of orthodoxy as it is the creation of christian dogma. That you conflate the early church with eroticism is 'interesting.'
What was your scifi novels named? Gay Pillowfights In Outerspace? Seems to be about the extent of your creativity.
He just ran to the "so what's the deal thread" to try an gather support against me - pathetic pussy!!!
Abject, conspiracy theory, false hypothesis moron. And spurned gay lover. Classic.
So now it's the word of God. Earlier it was written by people.
I didn't realize The Rock was involved. That dude is everywhere.
You theists don't know whether to or go blind. It's the word of God. You're not religious. The bible wasn't written by religious people because Jesus wasn't religious. Only Judaism is religion, not Christianity. Wait, Christianity is, but not your version. Wait, your version is the word of God, and some fell by the wayside but not you, you just get on a message forum and sling vulgarities because your gradient belief system allows you to do that in relative mental comfort.
You will know them by their fruits, and Christianity has a lot of fruits.
Atheism: when the truth is inescapable
^atheism *also a belief > NOT A FACT ^ he hasn't understood this^ thinks it is truth but atheism is also a belief^
This is true. Atheism is just a disbelief in God, nothing less, nothing more.
So where does the superiority come from? - oh yeah - that is just humans thinking they "know"
Every word is "God breathed." 2 Tim 3:16
How do you arrive at this conclusion?
Dogma is a principal or group of principals laid down by an authority as inconvertibly true. It is only PART of the primary basis of an ideology or belief system, not the whole. Scripture is the merely the writing, no more, no less.
Thus scripture is not the epitome of dogma.
Your statement is an exaggeration. I won't say "gross exaggeration", although most, you included, probably would.
Yes, I meant "compliments."
So what? You want egg in your beer?
You mean you have never made a mistake typing too quickly?
Yet since I chose not to edit my response due to one single word, then I, and my entire "edumacation", am subject to your ridicule because of that simple slight, that that negates my whole discourse, enough so that you decide it isn't worth reading?
Aren't you reaching a little bit here?
Why do you assume so much?
You make lots of assumptions about people's statements and yet ascribe them as a statement yourself, such as the "you give up" sentence, and the "no leg" sentence. And then you finally arrive at a conclusion that has no basis in fact.
You presume to ascribe to me YOUR statements as if they are MINE.
That is clear unadulterated falsehood on your part. The only TRUE statement you made was the one about "troll".
Since you pick and choose what you want to read of my posts, and finish most of your assumptions with a falsehood about what I have written, as well as end most with an insult, then how is that a discussion?
I'll flat out tell you, it isn't. What it is though is simplistic baiting, and it is hostile.
I am wondering how well that tactic has served you in life?
Do you have many friends who converse with you in this manner, or does it matter?
This is your analogy? What does that have to do with with the price of tea in China?
If you want a positive discussion, I am always willing, as I have always affirmed to you, but if you choose to be hostile, then we will not discourse. That simple.
Do you understand, or would you prefer to continue to be discordant?
Like I said before to you, no skin off my back.
How do you arrive at this conclusion?
Dogma is a principal or group of principals laid down by an authority as inconvertibly true. It is only PART of the primary basis of an ideology or belief system, not the whole. Scripture is the merely the writing, no more, no less.
Thus scripture is not the epitome of dogma.
Your statement is an exaggeration. I won't say "gross exaggeration", although most, you included, probably would.
Yes, I meant "compliments."
So what? You want egg in your beer?
You mean you have never made a mistake typing too quickly?
Yet since I chose not to edit my response due to one single word, then I, and my entire "edumacation", am subject to your ridicule because of that simple slight, that that negates my whole discourse, enough so that you decide it isn't worth reading?
Aren't you reaching a little bit here?
Why do you assume so much?
You make lots of assumptions about people's statements and yet ascribe them as a statement yourself, such as the "you give up" sentence, and the "no leg" sentence. And then you finally arrive at a conclusion that has no basis in fact.
You presume to ascribe to me YOUR statements as if they are MINE.
That is clear unadulterated falsehood on your part. The only TRUE statement you made was the one about "troll".
Since you pick and choose what you want to read of my posts, and finish most of your assumptions with a falsehood about what I have written, as well as end most with an insult, then how is that a discussion?
I'll flat out tell you, it isn't. What it is though is simplistic baiting, and it is hostile.
I am wondering how well that tactic has served you in life?
Do you have many friends who converse with you in this manner, or does it matter?
This is your analogy? What does that have to do with with the price of tea in China?
If you want a positive discussion, I am always willing, as I have always affirmed to you, but if you choose to be hostile, then we will not discourse. That simple.
Do you understand, or would you prefer to continue to be discordant?
Like I said before to you, no skin off my back.
This ^ is the result of an intelligent person ^in this case xmas ^
having an interaction with a troll - of which 95% of the posters here account for.
Never gonna lead to any new info or any learning.
right. You think you're superior because you "know".........whatever the you think that means.
uneducated nut.
but you're a cherry picker that wants it both ways.
xmas is a whiner. You take his whining to another level.
^angry ^
C'mon, Blake, you and I and everyone else here knows he was talking about "ego".
, isn't that what Pop always refers to as well when he says to "get over yourself"?
Think about this, just because someone continues to post inflammatory replies in response to equally inflammatory remarks thrown in their direction, this does not negate the possibility that they may possess some truth to share.
I guarantee you that if you for whatever reason decided to discuss some things in a positive and constructive, non-hostile manner with any of those you chose to be hostile and insulting with, that their responses to you would also change to one of congeniality and civility.
Just a word to the wise.
Btw it happened to me, as I told you before. There was a huge issue that SBM and I disagreed on concerning Pop, in fact we still disagree.
And there was a huge issue that skull and I disagreed on, and in fact we still disagree on even now.
Yet in both cases we agreed to be allowed to disagree, in other words, allowed to have divergent opinions, and in the process we have since found that there are many many other more important issues that we do find agreement in.
This would never have been possible had we not first ceased with our pissing contests.
If it comes to it, be the bigger man. However if you are, then refrain from gloating about it afterwards. That would be counter productive.
Yet if your true motivation is to sow discord, then I am quite certain that discord is all you will grow. And that is a bitter reward.
This is your response?
A whiner?
No, if anything these days I am a negotiator, I am a conciliator, and I am a traveler on the path to truth.
What are you? It seems to me you are on the path to bitterness, if you're not there already.
What are you proud to be?
here you're whining about people, including me.
why are you asking me personal questions?
On the contrary, you confuse whining with conciliating or negotiating.
I am attempting to mediate.
I have nothing to whine about.
Why do you think I do?
I am asking you personal questions because it is the only way to get to the crux of the matter. That should be obvious, unless you think my motivation is to just whine for the sake of whining.
I am trying to get you to step away from the hostility, long enough to grasp a more positive and constructive perspective.
I am trying to get you to give your higher consciousness a chance to exude itself.
i don't care what you're motivation is for whining. Just don't pretend you're not.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
