Did you forget which party got the filibuster party rolling?
Damn me for wanting a productive government.
Did you forget which party got the filibuster party rolling?
Why is this thread not about hypocritical republicans? I can post multiple youtoobz of current republican senators arguing for the exact parliamentary rule changes the senate made today.
Explain specifically how this is going to make the house worse. What bill would have come out of this House of Representatives that is not going to come out of the house now that this rule change is in place.
Majority rule in the senate, which I think this will eventually lead to, is going to produce a less productive government?
No one is stopping you. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the President and the Senate Majority Leader.
Guess we'll both just have to wait and see. I just don't see how this will make anyone more unified.Explain specifically how this is going to make the house worse. What bill would have come out of this House of Representatives that is not going to come out of the house now that this rule change is in place.
It's hard to be less productive but I think it will be. Like I said, hopefully the public wakes up and cleans out both sides.
of course they'd want a true democracty (majority rules) in a country where the majority or re s
are re s...
No.
Hardball v. Hardball.
This country grows more divided. Obama, sadly lost his leadership a while back. The middle ground shrinks.
^yeah and we know who's side you picked. the late admirable heinrich himmler would have cut off your head and down your throat.
Thats what the Jews said.
It was a very unfortunate auto correct. I cried.
I don't see how it will make anyone less unified. The parties are polarized regardless. This is about allowing Barry to fill three open seats on the most powerful court save for SCOTUS. The Republicans would have filibustered any nominee Barry made under the reasoning the court didn't have the work load to justify the seats. In the event they win the presidency in '16, they would have done an about face and approved any appointment forcing the Democrats to filibuster. Now, the president gets his appointments, assuming his party controls the senate, regardless of which party is in office.
When it comes to passing legislation, that's a different story, but that's not the rule that was changed...today.
You Himmler could give the orders but having to watch any actual killing and he threw up.
He could not kill a mouse by himself. You don't know your own hero.
you parrot allied lies and think you're telling me a thing or two
Your own Nazis, so diligent in keeping accurate records, noted it fool!
We know more about numbers in the Holocaust due to the Nazis than anyone else.
blood and brains splashed in his face and made him gag. you're a terrible liar or an idiot tbh.
So the Democrats had no qualms about using this method?
Then he should have eaten them like a tough guy.
To Be Honest...? Oh Yes. An honest Nazi? After the war, there were hardly any avowed Nazis in Germany. Where did they all go? Chicken Nazi.
actually there were so many that they gave up denazification. the rest went to argentina (the smart thing to do). yes the nazis were civilized and had values..honesty was one. hitler was the world's first animal rights activist and introduced the 40 hour work week and fair labor standards.
Well that was damn civil.
I retract everything I have ever said.
Where do I sign up brother?
Sure they did. The decision came after much resistance and consideration. They'll live with the consequences if and when the republicans nominate a candidate that can unite the American people and win the presidency and the senate.
This is is a utilitarian decision. I just don't see how this makes anything more polarized than it already is.
Is this true?
So the Democrats have no worries about political retribution? Things can't get any worse?
I can accept the utility of what may have been a stumbling block for both parties.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)