Manu Turnobili Romo... Costing the Spurs games since 2003

[timmy2003]

Let's face it. Rockets are a great offensive team probably the best in the league.

[Mikeanaro]

I love throwing to manu, but dude made 11 assists so to be fair, Kiwi made just 1 and he is moving like an old man with a heavy pair of balls and in the diapers.
Even Marco is playing great so whats the problem with this stone face ?

[DMC]

Spurs overcame a 22pt deficit and led by 5. That's a 28pt swing. That should normally win you the ball game. They might still have won if Pop let them play instead of playing Pop chess with the game on the line. Afraid his team cannot get a stop, sending Howard to the line, and then getting Harden to the line, Then Howard again. He gave away the lead, literally. The fact the Tim didn't foul Harden with 16 seconds left, down 2, is testament enough that Tim's head either isn't in the game or he had given up by then (aka done).

Leonard's offense is not a planned event. He's a defender 1st and foremost. It's amazing that he can provide any offense at all. That flukey against Chicago last season gave people false hope. He's not going to be a superstar. He's a solid starter, but he needs to abandon the 3 and concentrate more on mid range jumpers.

[spurraider21]

Spurs overcame a 22pt deficit and led by 5. That's a 28pt swing. That should normally win you the ball game. They might still have won if Pop let them play instead of playing Pop chess with the game on the line. Afraid his team cannot get a stop, sending Howard to the line, and then getting Harden to the line, Then Howard again. He gave away the lead, literally. The fact the Tim didn't foul Harden with 16 seconds left, down 2, is testament enough that Tim's head either isn't in the game or he had given up by then (aka done).

Leonard's offense is not a planned event. He's a defender 1st and foremost. It's amazing that he can provide any offense at all. That flukey against Chicago last season gave people false hope. He's not going to be a superstar. He's a solid starter, but he needs to abandon the 3 and concentrate more on mid range jumpers.

what about the flukey from Leonard in the finals?

[spurtech09]

Spurs overcame a 22pt deficit and led by 5. That's a 28pt swing. That should normally win you the ball game. They might still have won if Pop let them play instead of playing Pop chess with the game on the line. Afraid his team cannot get a stop, sending Howard to the line, and then getting Harden to the line, Then Howard again. He gave away the lead, literally. The fact the Tim didn't foul Harden with 16 seconds left, down 2, is testament enough that Tim's head either isn't in the game or he had given up by then (aka done).

what was the deal with the 3pt foul on harden when the spurs fouled howard....some weird stuff by the refs

[Buddy Mignon]

Would you shut the up already

[TheGreatYacht]

what about the flukey from Leonard in the finals?

Steps his game up in Games 6 & 7. You slander him
Manu costs Spurs #5. You still love him

I don't get Manu s

[ElNono]

Would you shut the up already

lol 5 tailed dragon...

[TheGreatYacht]

Would you shut the up already

When Manu retires

[benefactor]

Sup Scott...you still rocking those Horns shirts in Austin while displaying det Aggie cover photo on FB?

[spurraider21]

Steps his game up in Games 6 & 7. You slander him
Manu costs Spurs #5. You still love him

I don't get Manu s

you are a ing re . i was backing up kawhi and calling it flukey was clear sarcasm

[Kool Bob Love]

Cowboys Defense.

[iManu]

Is The Great Yacht a top and Skull-1 a bottom?

[hyhy]

Manu is +6, the highest +/- of anyone in the spurs team, and only Boris Diaw is another positive of +3

[cd021]

Steps his game up in Games 6 & 7. You slander him

Manu costs Spurs #5. You still love him

I don't get Manu s

Game 5- 24 pts, 10 assists. how did he cost us that one again?

Or was it game 6 when his 8 turnovers cost us 7 points, the vast majority occurred when we were up comfortably against Miami.

Or Game 7 when he had 18pts and 5 assists and was our second leading scorer.


Seriously, is this an inside joke with Skull-1? Ignore facts and bash Manu every chance you get

[Johnny RIngo]

Spurs overcame a 22pt deficit and led by 5. That's a 28pt swing. That should normally win you the ball game. They might still have won if Pop let them play instead of playing Pop chess with the game on the line. Afraid his team cannot get a stop, sending Howard to the line, and then getting Harden to the line, Then Howard again. He gave away the lead, literally. The fact the Tim didn't foul Harden with 16 seconds left, down 2, is testament enough that Tim's head either isn't in the game or he had given up by then (aka done).

Always been the problem with Pop. Most all-time great coaches play to win. Pop plays not to lose. Not surprising Spurs have had so much playoff collapses the past decade when they're led by a mentally weak coach.

[cd021]

Forget about Manu, where the is Kiwi?

And people think he's the 2nd best player on this team. If we go small, teams may start sagging off. He's hitting 1/4 of his 3's & he can't dribble and his passing can be iffy. When he wants to he can be dominant of the defensive end and on the glass though.

[Skull-1]

Is The Great Yacht a top and Skull-1 a bottom?

Yep. Top slice of bread and bottom slice of bread. You're the ham in the middle taking it from both sides.

[cd021]

11 assists

Should have been at least 13. We couldn't hit water from a boat in the 1st half.

[cd021]

Always been the problem with Pop. Most all-time great coaches play to win. Pop plays not to lose. Not surprising Spurs have had so much playoff collapses the past decade when they're led by a mentally weak coach.

Along with 3 les and 5 WCFs

[Skull-1]

Game 5- 24 pts, 10 assists. how did he cost us that one again?

Or was it game 6 when his 8 turnovers cost us "only" 7 points, the vast majority occurred when we were up comfortably against Miami.

Or Game 7 when he had 18pts and 5 assists and was our second leading scorer.


Seriously, is this an inside joke with Skull-1? Ignore facts and bash Manu every chance you get

Lol the stupidest take ever on this site. (You forgot your usual "only" so I fixed it.)

Second worst is your Game 7 take when Manu threw it away left and right in the fourth when we were clinging to a lead. "His turnovers didn't really hurt us."

[DMC]

Always been the problem with Pop. Most all-time great coaches play to win. Pop plays not to lose. Not surprising Spurs have had so much playoff collapses the past decade when they're led by a mentally weak coach.

He's not mentally weak. He's micromanaging. He wants them to trust each other but he doesn't show trust in them. He should let them win or lose on their own. I don't mind the strategy, but he gave away a lead. That was ignorant.

[cd021]

at Skull 1 ignore listed him months ago and he still DCs me every couple of weeks.

[Skull-1]

at Skull 1 ignore listed him months ago and he still DCs me every couple of weeks.

At complete dumbazz 021 (cd021) who claims, repeatedly, to have placed me on ignore months ago yet continues to directly reference my posts. (Is this to convince himself or the rest of you that fake ignoring cancels out the truth I have written???)

"Manu's eight turnovers cost us only 7 points. He didn't hurt us." -cd021


First this....

Seriously, is this an inside joke with Skull-1? Ignore facts and bash Manu every chance you get

Then this:

at Skull 1 ignore listed him months ago and he still DCs me every couple of weeks.

And isn't it DQ for Direct Quote?

I quote you to mock you. Gawd forbid anyone take you seriously with your garbage takes.

[look_at_g_shred]

thread!