Yep. There's no better coach in the NBA right now. It's not even close, tbh
I used to think this way... but now I think they will continue to be compe ive because it's not about the big 3 as much as it about the system that employs them. It will be a dark day when Pop calls it quits, but until then, I see the Spurs winning 50 a year.
Yep. There's no better coach in the NBA right now. It's not even close, tbh
It will be a sad day when Pop, Tim, and Manu are gone. Enjoy it while it lasts.
I still don't like the pulling of Duncan or how Pop managed that fourth quarter. That being said, I thought it was Pop was a maestro getting the Spurs there, and Spurs were definitely underdogs against a corporate juggernaut of a team. Plus we were a FT, a Manu turnover or Parker heroball away from winning it.
I'm not saying Pop doesn't deserve it but I think it would be Stotts or Vogel. The trend for winning COTY is usually basing it on last season's standing. I like Hornacek too, what he did to Suns this season. He's like Pop in the making for me, considering Suns are too young team and doesn't have even have a superstar but he was able to maximize his players. Even Suns fans reaction before the beginning of the season were already disappointed.
No one else could find a way to lose the Finals tbh, takes a genius like Pop...
Thibs, Vogel, Jim Carrey (who didn't the bed vs the Heat), Hornaceck, Clifford, Spoelstra and others are all as good if not better.
Last edited by Baam; 03-12-2014 at 12:22 AM.
Lately, yeah. But tbh it's always been more like a "newbie coach of the year" or "coach who ressurrected a team the most this season" award, rather than a "best coach of the year" award.
They aren't making the playoffs. Their schedule is insane. 13 of 18 games on the road. No way they give it to him unless they make the playoffs.
Terry Stotts-Portland
Pop-San Antonio
Frank Vogele-Indiana
Pretty much. Every other coach is too dumb to realize you have to sit Tim Duncan when you need to get defensive stops and rebounds.
Any coach in the league would agree with OP. Like z0sa said, it's not even close.
Pop's the man.
And this is the honest truth.
Anyone saying the opposite is totally out of their mind IMHO.
Leave it to an OG to bring sense as usual.
Exactly...the Heat were SUPPOSED to win it all. Any other team besides the Spurs out of the West would've probably gotten swept by Miami. Yeah, it sucks to get so close and not win it all, but the other team is getting paid, too.
This year we'll have HCA and should beat everyone we face in the playoffs. Barring any significant injuries, #5 is likely ours this time.
The Spurs may not always win the le, but they are always in the hunt, and they are still the winningest pro sports franchise over the past 15 years, period. Yes, the Spurs ARE a dynasty. Enjoy it while it lasts.![]()
True, so true,
Truer words were never said, yet some ignoramuses on here disagree.
Go figure.![]()
The team deserves credit for winning the games they did win in the Finals. DG being left open to hit threes wasn't the only reason those games were won. Surely, once Spoelstra figured out what to do against him, it set us back but let's not discredit our clear superiority over the Heat that was negated by the worst 28 seconds to finish a game in NBA Finals history.
I wouldn't call a racist as "bringing in some sense"
What clear superiority? Parker hit a lucky three to take the lead in a Game 6 that Miami was controlling.
Uh, we were up 10 after 3 quarters...and led for more quarters than they did if you look at the numbers throughout the series. So, yes, it was clear superiority ed by a miserable 28 seconds. As for "lucky three" for TP, how about Miller getting to hit a three without a shoe? Or all the lucky threes Battier was hitting in game 7?
Lmao baseline couldn't be less racist
Bat tier wasn't lucky. Just stop
And Miami was up 3 with two minutes to go in the fourth quarter of Game 6 and mostly controlled Game 7. I call Parker's three to tie the game (not take the lead as I said above) lucky because:
(1) He's not a three point shooter
(2) James was right up on him
(3) It was a desperation shot to beat the shot clock buzzer.
As opposed to Miller who is one of the top shooters of the last 20 years getting an open three because of Neal's lazy D and then Battier who got tons of great open looks.
Pop put us in a position where either a free throw make by Kawhi or Manu would've won a ring for us.
True. The Spurs gaining that 5-point lead was almost as fluky as them losing it. That Parker 3 (not even from the corner; Parker is a pretty bad 3-point shooter above the break) was a straight bailout/BS shot.
Oh and about the thread, I think it would take 4 things happening for Pop to win CotY:
1) Spurs finish 62-20 or better and have the best record in the league
2) Portland falls to #7 or below
3) Phoenix fails to make the playoffs
4) Indiana doesn't get the 1 seed in the East
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)