Reply With Quote
Didn't you do that to believe in God?
So you actually have no proof whatsoever.Like everything that exist
OK, that's fair.
Didn't you do that to believe in God?
Both, tbh.
Yes, didn't you do the same to believe in evolution?
So you believe in science.
OK, that's fair.
Honestly I have nothing, sorry, wish I did.
I have heard they are studying Gods' existence, but I doubt there is anything of significance.
Science will study anything and everything.
That is what is so great about science and the human curiosity to know.
I'm sure if you google, "Is there any scientific proof that God exists?", you will find a lot of studies so far.
But don't forget, according to 2120 God loves nachos, He told him so.
Why would I not believe in science? I do not believe in evolution but I do believe in science.
Both, tbh.
So you don't think there is anything wrong in believing things in books written by a man.
OK, that's fair.
You tried to disparage science in this very thread independent of evolution.
Of course not, doesn't mean they're though. Which is the case with evolution.
Last edited by RD2191; 03-18-2014 at 09:58 PM.
I just googled what I told you to google and was very surprised to see so many scientific arguments for existence.
It was no surprise to find for non-existence.
You might want to believe in books by men about the English language.
Nice to have a decent discussion for a change without trolls running off at the mouths spewing their invectives just because they disagree and aren't smart enough to provide a coherent argument.
Give it one more try.
typo, did you ever find any evidence of evolution?
I for one go on record as saying that the theory of evolution most probably has a lot of truths and is somewhat reasonable, and even does not contradict anything connected with an existence of God.
But like most theories, they probably didn't get everything right either.
There is still much we don't know and much to still be proven, especially on the replication front.
Sure. It's been presented to you over and over.
You asked specifically for a fish that walks on land. I posted a picture of one and you ran away like a little girl.
You are doing the same when asked for your proof of God.
I fully appreciate matters of faith, but don't pretend that belief in God consists of anything more than that.
The theory is full of flaws and zero evidence. Most people and even scientist are afraid to question it because they're afraid of being ridiculed and being called stupid. A quick Google search tells of the huge manipulation of fossils and how most of them are frauds. It really is fascinating. 1 problem with evolution is that there really is no clear definition of what it is. In other words anything and everything can fit into evolution. So even if someone gives a sound alternative theory it is simply molded to fit right into their theory of evolution. Epigenetics is 1 of many new discoveries that is now being molded to fit right into Darwins theory which is just a load of crap.
There is a catfish that walks from pond to pond as it pollutes the pond it lives in. This is common knowledge.
Not to everyone apparently.
Fish that walk on land exist today, fish that turned into birds and rodents do not and never have.
So now you're moving the goalposts.
OK.
Not unexpected tbh.
I'm not, and where the is your link of imaginary half fish half mammals?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
