You are a special kind of re aren't you?
Why didnt Pop just keep playing Timmy-Tiago together if neutralizing OKC's small ball/forcing Brooks to 'compensate' was as simple as going big?
who cares? Who would guard Lee on defense?
You are a special kind of re aren't you?
Why didnt Pop just keep playing Timmy-Tiago together if neutralizing OKC's small ball/forcing Brooks to 'compensate' was as simple as going big?
it's about Lee, not just about going big. But you haven't watched Lee and you don't care about stats so you wouldn't know.
I'm re ed for arguing with you in this re ed thread topic.
Smh utsa
diaw reminds me of RJ tenure here when the sperms signed him
has all the tools to be a top5 player at their position, whether its due to the systems role, there is no excuses why they cant beat the other 25 teams SF in the league who are not even compe ion to them
yet both are always passive on offense, only get into it when popa lights a fire under them....
todays league plenty of perimeter players arent even elite defenders, yet why does diaw love to pump fake or hesitate to take a open 3, there should be no reason why he cant dribble to the key anytime he wants on every possession he touches...its like a mismatch every time his out there, but prefers to take a backup role for the choke artists to shine
That part was about you, idiot. You don't watch him play but go off his cute stats. You do suck at arguing though, done trying to help your dumb ass see the light tbh.
smh Tech
Lol see the light.
When threads get started asking "what's the most re ed homer opinion you've ever seen on Spurstalk", Diaw> Lee will always, always be mentioned because it's so incredibly unintelligent and full of gnsf sucking bull .
Not only should you stop trying to argue it, you should punch yourself in the face.
Smh utsa dumb .
You actually think you know what you are talking about you, dont you? You dont even watch Lee play.![]()
"Diaw> Lee" because of the eye test.
Who are you that you are an expert?lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)