Foundational Falshoods of Creationism

[spurraider21]

You would think the Scientists that helped create that chart would know enough about our universe to explain Stonehenge or cure Ebola.

That's like me saying I know where and when the first time man used the wheel and created a colorful chart like yours that shows the beginning of moving vehicles until now and yet I still can't figure out how to change the tire on my sons bike.

You can't have it both ways either Science know exactly how we got here and needs to prove it or admit they don't know about the Universe and just STFU.

(in the meantime take the bull out of the school texts books)

what about somebody that understands the workings of an internal combustion engine but simultaneously can't repair his car's engine

[Blake]

You emotionally resorting to ridicule (see the bold above) does nothing for "truth" except betray your "true" motivations here, thus it exposes you for being the fraud you are when it comes to reason and rationality.

If you want to act like a kid ranting because he didn't get his toy, fine.

A spanking can resolve that.

I thought you were a smart mature adult, but the more you post, the more you prove that thought to be wrong.

You're an emotional thin skinned pussy.

Lol you want to spank another man.

[leemajors]

now xmas wants to spank dudes?

[Blake]

now xmas wants to spank dudes?

Haha..I slid an edit in before you.

[RD2191]

You're an emotional thin skinned pussy.

Lol you want to spank another man.

How did it feel when you found out another man was slapping your wife?

[Blake]

How did it feel when you found out another man was slapping your wife?

Not good so I got a divorce.

Lol you believe in magic

[DMC]

I rest my case. ^ What you meant to say was, if you knew the truth, then you would never resorted to an emotional statement in the first place that were false, accusatory, and insulting.
If you act like an ignorant asshole, that reflects on you, not me.
I am always willing to give the benefit of the doubt, I have no personal investment in this, rather I am just responding back as to what is throw my way.
And even then, I hold no grudge, nor ever meant offense.
The truth is you started this emotional , not me, as verified in the posts.
Thus we can stop any time you choose to act like a mature and reasonable adult.

You emotionally resorting to ridicule (see the bold above) does nothing for "truth" except betray your "true" motivations here, thus it exposes you for being the fraud you are when it comes to reason and rationality.

If you want to act like a kid ranting because he didn't get his toy, fine.

A spanking can resolve that.

I thought you were a smart mature adult, but the more you post, the more you prove that thought to be wrong.

Two responses to the same post. You seem a bit affected by this. It's actually a compliment.

[RD2191]

Not good so I got a divorce.

Lol you believe in magic

Your ex was quite the magician, she was able to make large objects appear and disappear.

[DMC]

Your ex was quite the magician, she was able to make large objects appear and disappear.

You also seem personally invested in the outcomes of discussions with your internet peeps. You should perhaps step back from the keyboard and adjust your at ude, young man, else I'll get Xmas up there to bend you over his knee while he's in the mood.

[xmas1997]

Your ex was quite the magician, she was able to make large objects appear and disappear.

DMC and blake both apparently need spankings, they are both acting like bratty kids and "time out" failed.

I'm quite sure we can find someone willing to do the job.

It sounds like leemajors is volunteering, he was the first to speak up, I wonder why.

[RD2191]

DMC and blake both apparently need spankings, they are both acting like bratty kids and "time out" failed.

I'm quite sure we can find someone willing to do the job.

It sounds like leemajors is volunteering, he was the first to speak up, I wonder why.

[xmas1997]

You're an emotional thin skinned pussy.

Lol you want to spank another man.

What "man"?

There is no "man" here, just an immature kid, like you.

Are you 13, 14, or 15?

But in your case a spanking won't help.

You probably need to go in your room, with your computer, phone, and TV privileges taken away from you, and think about how bratty you are.

You need to be seen, and not read.

Both you and your brother SBM.

[xmas1997]

Two responses to the same post. You seem a bit affected by this. It's actually a compliment.

It's an emotional response, rather than one of reason, and we all know it, I'm surprised it has to be explained to you.

Backhanded complements are just as insulting as straight forward ones and are nothing less than resorting to last ditch efforts to disguise your inability to engage in an intelligent coherent discussion or debate.

What it actually does is imply you are suffering from a serious lack of maturity and also of other deep seated issues such as an inferiority complex.

It's okay, you can't help it, but you should seek professional help ASAP.

[DMC]

It's an emotional response, rather than one of reason, and we all know it, I'm surprised it has to be explained to you.

Backhanded complements are just as insulting as straight forward ones and are nothing less than resorting to last ditch efforts to disguise your inability to engage in an intelligent coherent discussion or debate.

What it actually does is imply you are suffering from a serious lack of maturity and also of other deep seated issues such as an inferiority complex.

It's okay, you can't help it, but you should seek professional help ASAP.

Actually it's not emotional at all. When I read your attempts at entering the science discussion fray, I get a headache from all of your switchbacks that are either designed by you to get responses from people itching to correct you, or are unintentional because you simply lack a fundamental understanding of science.

Here's what you've offered:

1. Psychology is nebulous so you elected a science major
2. Science is testable so it's not nebulous (thus your comparison to psychology)
3. You have no evidence that science is true. (faith based argument)
4. You have evidence that science is true. (computer/phone)

So you're either trolling or stupid.

[Blake]

What "man"?

There is no "man" here, just an immature kid, like you.

Are you 13, 14, or 15?

But in your case a spanking won't help.

You probably need to go in your room, with your computer, phone, and TV privileges taken away from you, and think about how bratty you are.

You need to be seen, and not read.

Oh so you're saying you want to spank kids

Both you and your brother SBM.

Wut

[Blake]

Your ex was quite the magician, she was able to make large objects appear and disappear.

good one

Lol you believe in magic

[xmas1997]

Actually it's not emotional at all. When I read your attempts at entering the science discussion fray, I get a headache from all of your switchbacks that are either designed by you to get responses from people itching to correct you, or are unintentional because you simply lack a fundamental understanding of science.

Here's what you've offered:

To resort to insults, which is generally accepted as a vainly attempted emotional attack, backhanded or otherwise, is a last resort tactic that carries no weight in any kind of discussion or debate, this is common knowledge, which apparently you have no conception of, and if you do, chose to ignore it.
That is fine, if your intent is to make a fool of yourself, which you did, or if your intent is to troll, which you do in this forum quite often if the majority of your posts are any indication.

1. Psychology is nebulous so you elected a science major

I found psychology to be quite nebulous in that it relied on generalizations in it's attempt to explain human behavior. I won't go into detail, but will just say that the "norm" is next to impossible to be replicated, and IMHO lacks in quantifiability.

2. Science is testable so it's not nebulous (thus your comparison to psychology)

Many of the social sciences suffer from these same problems including a "dearth of accurate terminology".

3. You have no evidence that science is true. (faith based argument)

You misunderstood this then, and still do now. You resorted to the age old argument that just because someone somewhere has this "true" knowledge that that makes it true for all, but this is a common fallacy. What in essence you are doing is "assuming" at best, and assumptions are not proof, nor are they YOUR proof unless you have the evidence in your possession; Anything less than that, then you have a reliance on others, and depending on how much you trust those "others" determines how much you believe it to be true. And if you "believe" it to be truth, without possessing the evidnce, then that is no different than having faith that it is the truth.

4. You have evidence that science is true. (computer/phone)

You brought up the typewriter analogy as being an example of evidence, and I extended it to include computers and cell phones.

So you're either trolling or stupid.

I believe you meant this about yourself since you failed to understand the comparisons, and logic, and thus resorted to insults which is an emotional response rather than a reasonable and rational response. And this was your problem, not mine. All I did was point out the fallacies of your arguments and the worthlessness of the tactics you vainly tried to use to support your contentions.
Obviously this upset you, otherwise you would not have reacted in an emotional manner.

Oh so you're saying you want to spank kids Wut

Kids like you should be seen and not read, and when you act up in an unruly manner, then you need a good spanking (by commonly agreed upon extension, administered by your parents).
In case you weren't aware, the whole animal kingdom uses corporal punishment to keep their offspring in line.
You demonstrated your ignorance on a colossal level by "generalizing" my statement to include "all" kids by "me", a major ad hominem on your part.
And we can only laugh at the level you continually stoop to in showing how truly moronic you are on this site.

[silverblk mystix]

LOL the cuck and dmc getting schooled in this thread -


and both are too pussy to attend the gtg

[silverblk mystix]

Your ex was quite the magician, she was able to make large objects appear and disappear.

We know she "believed" in Magic!!!!!!!!

[xmas1997]

Your ex was quite the magician, she was able to make large objects appear and disappear.

EDIT: You mean like blake?

[xmas1997]

We know she "believed" in Magic!!!!!!!!

[Blake]

LOL the cuck and dmc getting schooled in this thread -


and both are too pussy to attend the gtg

Just sensitive mystix and xmas getting their feelings hurt and making it personal

same ol

[Blake]

^ laughing at peoples real life = troll

[xmas1997]

Just sensitive mystix and xmas getting their feelings hurt and making it personal

same ol

Wow, you still misunderstood and misinterpreted what was said even though it was made perfectly clear to you!

You will never have any room to talk about anyone else' reading comprehension ever again after this, you will never live it down!

Be a man, not an "immature kid begging for a spanking", and own up to the "truth" instead of embracing lie after lie.

Are you in the midst of a deep depression, is that what your problem is, why you live in abject denial?

[Blake]

You're a thin skinned idiot that has no clue what he's talking about.