As man made as evolution.![]()
Do you think the it was speaking literally rather than allegorically?
Just asking, no offense meant.
As man made as evolution.![]()
its impossible to sway somebody's beliefs about God, since it's ultimately based on faith anyway, as opposed to hard evidence. it can boil down to people trying to prove/disprove god's existence, but its up to the individuals if they choose to make the leap of faith or not
the main thing that gets on my nerves is when people argue certain scientific points when they have zero grasp of the concept at hand
God seemed pretty pleased with the very literal sacrifice of seven men in his name.
Plus it's not a matter of swaying IMHO.
It's a matter of discussing without the intent of swaying in the first place in order to better understand someone's point of view.
To do otherwise is an attempt to proselytize or convert someone who does not want to be converted in the first place.
That could be considered to be an invasion and thus be resisted rather than sharing points of views IMHO.
So you believe in a literal translation?
I only have the words written in the Bible to go on here.
Explain how it is an allegorical human sacrifice.
Use the scripture itself to show how seven men were not really killed to gain God's favor in this account.
So you believe in a literal translation?
I don't.
I see, you're the guy that writes a lot and says nothing, I've read some of your circular reasoning here and there. answering your question, it depends on who you ask.... what do you believe? Did crist actually died and resurrected or is all allegorical made up stuff?
I only have the words of the bible to go by in this story, so I have no reason to conclude it is describing anything other than an actual human sacrifice.
Why would the Bible not mean what it says?
Are you calling the Bible a lie?
just so we don't go in the same circles over again, if you don't take the stories literally, that means you don't believe they actually occurred as stated in the bible
Possibly..... fact remains though![]()
I think this is pretty accurate.... happened or didn't, simple isn't it?
No, I think there is much truth contained within it, as there are in all the great books.
But I see more allegory than literalism is all I am saying.
I think Jesus Christ actually did die and resurrected.
But there is no way I can prove it.
I can't prove evolution either.
Nor can I prove the universe is expanding.
crofl
Why did you stonewall about this all day just to give it away for free now?
Pure troll behavior.
I'll try not to go in circles if I can.
So, jesus did die and resurrected, but some other stories are allegories? how convenient. Let me guess.... every time old testament lunatic deity does something crazy it is an allegory, when dude does good it is literal.
Define truth please.
so you take the story of the resurrection literally
its allegory if it no longer fits current moral standards.
Some of the allegory was explained through the use of parables, but even the parables were shrouded in mystery for reasons that only today we are beginning to understand like the parable of the mus seed IMHO.
But parables were also a form of allegorical story telling, they were meant to give us lessons in how to live our lives. In other cases they were meant to be symbols of of things alluded to but not openly explained, such as brothers symbolizing mountains, or cities, etc., things of that nature.
The OT is full of it more so than the NT IMHO.
But keep in mind, this is my opinion.
I think much of the resurrection may have been literal.
But not having been there, there is no way I can say for sure.
There is a certain amount of truth to that statement IMHO.
Times change, and so does the morals evolve with the times.
Seriously, it's much easier to believe seven dudes were sacrificed in an attempt to please God than to believe God spawned himself by impregnating a virgin, then let himself be killed and resurrected himself then just left for good, only to be seen later in clouds and toast.
so you take some parts of the bible literally, but other parts figuratively.
of course. again, that's why this is a discussion of your beliefs. i've never asked you to tell me exactly what happened. i've always just asked for your beliefs. it seems you have moved on from those nonsensical arguments and are being a bit clearer about your belief systemBut not having been there, there is no way I can say for sure.![]()
Avante and his family seem so ing corny and boring(along with fat and ugly, of course), tbh..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)