Reply With Quote
Bull ! You not really saying anything is becoming a constant in your posts.
I don't go into the tech section and try to explain computer set ups because I don't know that much.
I don't challenge you on your track records and blues artists because I don't know that much.
I don't go spouting off about NBA contracts and all the minutiae that goes with team rules via the collective bargaining agreement.
But you have no problem throwing up on things you know very little about and feel totally comfortable. In the real world, where people get paid for having a clue, that's called fraud... Mate.
Last edited by pgardn; 08-23-2014 at 08:31 PM.
Bull ! You not really saying anything is becoming a constant in your posts.
Whatever
So do you think DNA just came about by chance?
RNA a much simpler system is thought to have given rise to the DNA system that works in eukaryotic cells. The DNA information system employed in bacteria is much simpler. Bacteria were around about a billion years before euk. cells. And will likely be far into the future, when multi cellular euk are gone. A simple system coming before and lasting longer.
Do I need to continue or do you understand how wrong you are?
Bolt just ran the first under 10 indoor 100m and avante is too worried about evolution to notice. so sad.
Wrong about what?
avante do you understand ANYTHING about DNA besides regurgitating that "it's complex"
You are kidding right?
Where did I make any statement where I'm right or wrong applies?
About claiming the DNA system now employed by some euk organisms being a miracle. Magic, poof, too complex, must be God.
And btw, the system is flawed and far from perfect even though it is complex. A computer programmer would never invent a system so easily flawed and containing mistakes. But it works for NOW, and that's good enough from an evolutionary perspective.
Like you once said trying to explain this is too complex. Obviously I've read all abvout it I did that today, do I really need a long rerun of all that?
i'm asking you a yes or no question though, not something that requires pages of explanation
Hmmmm....
You are in the wrong heat, at the wrong meet... little fella.
All I know little fella is all you've done is tap dance.
ONE MORE TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey pgardn, do you think DNA just came about by chance...ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHO CAN TELL ME HOW DNA CAME ABOUT BY CHANCE??????????????????????????
Damn people how many ways can you ignore that question?
The DNA system most likely arose from RNA genius.
Did you read anything I wrote? Anything?
Yeah...if you analyze the chemical structure of both there's one fundamental difference between the two. One extra hydroxyl group. Avante is trolling tbh.
Which is why I wrote the above to begin with.
You are out of your league, like a child that has walked into the middle of a complicated novel and drooled on the pages.
And settle down, you are the guy who never takes anything seriously...
Not to mention RNA being more reactive due to that hydroxyl group
If trolling is an attempt to make a complete fool of yourself...
And there are more diff. between the two molecules that actually are a bit more compelling in showing unity and diversity. Unity and diversity being a very important theme in a fairly complex discussion, molecular evolution.
Not sking about..."most likely"....genius. I;m asking you if you think something as complex as DNA could just happen by chance? Are you capable of....yes or no?
Avante is here just to get a rise out of posters tbh.
and yes, I agree with you. There are many more differences. I'm more of a thermodynamics guy tho so you can imagine what aspects I look into more. Thermodynamics is lyfe.
There is complicated about this, why do you think there is?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
