im asking you. you are the one who made the claim about the "non-functioning universe"
Ask Darwin.
im asking you. you are the one who made the claim about the "non-functioning universe"
Yes I know..... but I didn't make the claim I couldn't teach it to you.
(there is a difference)
so you are going to blab about scenario's where the universe "doesn't function," whatever that means, but can't even elaborate as to what a "non-functioning universe" is? cool. well played.
That pancake has two sides.
You can't say....in fact, 10 + 10 can't even be a FRACTION less or a FRACTION more, then universe wouldn't be functioning! this is groundbreaking stuff. 10+10 being EXACTLY 20, not even infinitesimally more or less than 20, is proof that we have a divine creator who made this perfect system where 10+10 is exactly 20. this is proof that these bones are 25 Million years old
You can't have it both ways in a debate you must pick which card your going pull out of your deck ,once you pull it, its on the table you really want to go there as far as Bull numbers?
go for it.
No I'm going to wait till someone with a GED replies and make the debate educational while entertaining your neither.
a lot of blabbering nonsense. to be expected.
By who?
Not by you since you never debated me. And who you referring to when you say its expected?
I debate this topic @ MIT including students professors and faculty. I'm sure your XBox playing no pussy getting ass should be a breeze.
Look I can ass rape you on this topic with quotes, links and videos alone without ever having to give you my personal opinion.
You on the other hand already gave yours.
(don't worry if you PM me I will edit my replies. Last thing i want to do is belittle you online, that is not goal of mine since your doing a better job at it than I could ever do.
Last edited by mouse; 08-26-2014 at 02:01 PM.
you make extravagant claims and then shy away from them when challenged
Just ing with Holmes so how long you been supporting Darwin?
lots of quote editing going on here, its hard to keep up
its mockery. you posted a video talking about numbers and constants being specific to the smallest decimal number (just like 10 + 10 being EXACTLY 20.00000000), and you somehow equated that to a refutation of evolution
do you know how they date bones to be millions of years old?
Get off your pink my pony gay Dallas maverick logo high horse like Darwin didn't pull that Evolution out of his crusty ass?
what part of the Debate has been won years ago with the DNA mathematical code.
I know this must be a huge uncomfortable truth pill for you to swallow but its already in your mouth stfu and swallow it![]()
You can't evolve from nothing you need math how hard is that to follow?
Your Daddy + Your mammy = your sorry ass.
No I have yet to see one.do you know how they date bones to be millions of years old?
you have any links?
I dare you to pull the age of bones card you make this salad tossing debate so easy I can just go to photo bucket wash rinse repeat..
![]()
so what he was the purpose of posting that video? this is why i said it has nothing of substance. it doesn't contribute to the conversation at all
that's what i figuredNo
Your so right, my mistake you Win!
grab another mountain dew and go after Avante or Xmas1997 my day care center for the low IQ no pussy getting vatos online closed down years ago due to having a class that raised the IQ level of those who who read my replies I had finally had to be expelled from the center for over achieving. (WTF?) That was when I knew MIT was the way to go. feel free to join in on the debates with your skateboarder replies.
Poor ratto@ saving creationists bull videos and pictures in photobucket to "debate" people on the Internets
![]()
You have no idea what the theory of evolution even is, so I'm not overly worried about your opinion of it.
You have had years to learn what the theory is, and the evidence to support it, but you have chosen not to, and that assumes you are able to understand it, an assumption that I would be dubious of, to put it mildly.
Does the truth matter to you?
You are probably too new to see his work in the "faked" moon landings thread.
mouse buys into all sorts of conspiracy theories.
You do realize that is a physics textbook right?
Physics and biology are entirely separate fields. Not sure if you had noticed.
I am going to guess mou-se is pretty high at the moment. Not sure I want to bother with continuing to engage someone who is probably pretty baked. It reminds me of trying to build a model airplane out of wet noodles. I am already regretting bothering, and I haven't even read his inevitable, puerile, smiley-ridden response.
Still, bringing it back to the fact of evolution is probably worthwhile. the m-man can post smiley's and yootoobs, and I will have fun reading scientific papers.
Should say Father Georges Edward Lemaitre tbh. Theory was rejected for decades by science as an foolish attempt to inject religion into science.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)