Reply With Quote
Do you think they re-sign him though?
Of course you do, the most rascist and murderous country on the planet
Do you think they re-sign him though?
It it was actually the germans who took down the roman empire, and the natives were eliminated because might makes right. Just because other races have been completely genocided in the past does not mean I'm going to sit by and let it happen to mine.
I'm a nationalist, think about it its not hard. I don't always agree with them but I agree with their right to exist.Youre all over the place now breh, or did you just chicken because of Lefty's threat?
I wish they could comrade, that man loved his people
Care to rebut?
Why is it "stoopid" for me to want an immigrant to learn the native language?
Why is it "stoopid" for me to want an immigrant/descendant to actually care about his adopted country rather than treat it like a place of employment?
Why is it "stoopid" for me to not want that immigrant/descendant to wave their flag over the flag of their adopted country?
Last edited by midnightpulp; 11-23-2014 at 02:15 AM.
smh. m>s private info has already been posted on here, why is everybody so interested in outing each other. i must be one of the few who doesn't believe in snitching or going after personal info.
He stopped talking a lot after I trolled him into posting pics of himself in his premanufactured home bathroom mirror with the toothpaste corrosion at the bottom. Just saying.
Well it actually wasn't, kori of al people wouldn't doxx a poster but yeah that's the type of underhanded stuff people do when they get outwitted intellectually and can't actusl argue against what the other person is saying.
Just as a point-counter point style retort: Which native American language do you speak?
Nazis suck.
Couldn't even take over Russia. ing losers.
Not while fighting every major power at once no, but they came closer than anyone ever has to beating Russia alone while also fighting France, the UK, Poland, all of britains colonies, etc. the only thing that stopped them was Italy's incompetence delaying the Barbarossa for 6 weeks plus an early winter.
Just think they beat russia no Cold War, no spread of communism to Asia, and death of millions of innocent people
Yes, but they did so in a similar way that the Mexicans are doing so in the US. Wanting to enjoy the luxury of Roman civilization, they pretty much flooded Rome en masse. And when Rome finally collapsed, they assumed control. Fully Christianized by that point, they eventually created the Holy Roman Empire.
My point with this is that the "master race" Germans were once the subhuman, the proverbial " skin," and were looked at as filth by the more advanced and civilized Romans. The Germans grew to appreciate Roman civilization and basically turned into a version of them (Holy Roman Empire). They forsook their "host" culture in favor of something that wasn't theirs. If Germans really want a return to "purity," they should return to a simple, nomadic, barbaric life. What Germans want to return to is Roman in origin. That's why this talk of "preserving our culture" makes little sense to me, since it's not even German to begin with.
That's why I stress to you not to be so myopic and bigoted toward peoples who are developing right now. Pretty much every race/culture on Earth had to evolve, and every race/culture were once considered subhuman.
Also, the HRE was just as diverse ethnically and culturally as the United States.
Could very well be considered the first "multicultural civilization."
Last edited by midnightpulp; 11-23-2014 at 02:20 AM.
But it's not theirs anymore.
Germany is 0-2 on 20th Century world wars.
Germany is #1 in freaky sex strange sex. Is this a result of Hitlers Nazis?
Germany --two girls, one cup.......
It's always theirs, they have reservations.
I take your answer to mean "none". English might be the common language, but it's hardly the native language. Named after an Italian map maker (or his apprentice), discovered by Spanish explorers, and before that likely the Vikings and before them like the tribal people who came across up North, this continent certainly isn't England.
And Casinos.
And beads.
I would have to agree that, if you're going to pull up roots and move to another land, you probably need to learn to speak the common tongue, however maybe not. If they can exist without it, why should they? I wouldn't know how to speak Spanish if no one here spoke it.
Well yeah, because if you live in the Southwest, having Spanish as a second language is pretty much a necessity, so there's no pressure on them to learn, since there will always be someone they can communicate with.
I don't feel I should be required to learn a second language in a country that has had English as its official language since its foundation.
It's funny, too. Someone like Splits would decry an American who lived in France and had "the audacity" to expect everyone to speak English, but it's "stoopid" to expect the French (or any other) immigrant to learn English out of the same courtesy.
mfw
telling a story using > bullet points
lots of nazi memes
so cool!
Why the is it your business what language other people speak? How does that affect you? Have you ever lived in another country? Do you know how hard it is to "learn a language" if you haven't been educated in primary school to speak multiple languages? You don't just pick up a book or go to a couple of classes and magically speak another language.
One of the last distiguishing features the US possesses is the fact that we are a nation of immigrants. Nobody of European decent that lives here is actually from here. We're the only melting pot in the world that brings different races and cultures together. This country was literally built by immigrants. It's one of the only reasons to be proud of this country, and you want to destroy that honor by putting some arbitrary language requirement on today's immigrants? Should they learn it before or after they immigrate? If after, how many years? Should we have an immigration police visiting people's homes and figuring out how far along they are on the "learn english" timeline? This is ing stupid. stoopid.
My great-grandparents on my mother's side spoke German and not a lick of English. On my father's side they spoke Italian and no English. Sure, their kids (my parents) learned the language, and so did their kids and their kids, but why is it so important to you that today's 1st generation immigrants speak your language?
Why is it "stoopid" for me to want an immigrant/descendant to actually care about his adopted country rather than treat it like a place of employment?
Do you understand the difference between an immigrant and someone who tries to become a citizen? Many many people move here for reasons outside of their own volition. We live in an internationalized economy, global businesses ask their employees to perform overseas duties for pre-defined durations. Yet you think any "foreigner" who obtains the necessary work permits to live here should pledge allegiance to a foreign country? Or do you view "immigration" as "brown people hopping the Rio Grande" and generalize the immigrant population?
Why is it "stoopid" for me to not want that immigrant/descendant to wave their flag over the flag of their adopted country?
Again, do you understand what an immigrant is vs. someone applying for citizenship? Nationalism is one of the most dangerous concepts aside from religion in the history of civilization, which you so like to espouse your knowledge about re: ancient rome. There is no legal basis for an immigrant to the US to learn the language or espouse allegiance, and rightfully so. Do you propose establishing these requirements on American immigrants? Did you know that until 1920, there was no such thing as an "illegal" immigrant, that anyone could move to the US without question of their allegiance?
I'm an American citizen, I've obtained work permits in Belgium, Switzerland, and Italy and lived and worked in those countries on and off over the last 10 years. I speak some of their 4 languages (German, French, Flemish, Italian) in varying degrees, from fluent to taxi/restaurant. I've never applied for citizenship. But by your prescription I should have never been allowed to seek work and live a normal life in those places unless I learn their languages fluently and pledge allegiance to their flags.
Get the out of here. That's why I called you "stoopid". Don't try to preach the life of an expat unless you've lived it. Stick to clowning the Lakers.
I'd say going after Great Brittian was wrong when he could have gone straight into the Soviet Union and fought a war on one front instead of two.
Great Britain declared war before Barbarossa..
It's my business every time I have to wait in line an extra 5 to 20 minutes for the cashier/clerk, etc to slowly explain something to a non-English speaking resident, of which there are many here in sunny Southern California. I'm lucky these days if I can get out of the post office or bank in under 20 in' minutes. I hope you can extrapolate the lost productivity in the workplace because of that. This is also demanding that workers learn another language (let's not beat around the bush, we're talking about Spanish) or be multilingual just to effectively communicate with their customers.
Do you know how hard it is to "learn a language"
And this is exactly my point. Why should I have to be the one to go through that difficulty when I'm not the guest/immigrant?
You're romanticizing our immigration history. In our ""Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free" days, when immigration started to approach unsustainable levels as related to our economy/infrastructure, the US did impose limits.One of the last distiguishing features the US possesses is the fact that we are a nation of immigrants. Nobody of European decent that lives here is actually from here. We're the only melting pot in the world that brings different races and cultures together. This country was literally built by immigrants. It's one of the only reasons to be proud of this country, and you want to destroy that honor by putting some arbitrary language requirement on today's immigrants? Should they learn it before or after they immigrate? If after, how many years? Should we have an immigration police visiting people's homes and figuring out how far along they are on the "learn english" timeline? This is ing stupid. stoopid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Quota_Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924
And until 1964, immigrants from Mexico didn't have a defacto open border into the United States. Now that they do (from 00-10, the Hispanic population grew at a 4 to 1 rate compared to the overall country's), they're flooding into the country at an alarming rate. You'll probably cry "racist, we're a country of immigrants!" but my concern has nothing to do with their skin color or cultural mores, and everything to do with the sheer numbers they're immigrating at. If you don't see how this is a problem in a country that already has 320 million people and a fragile economy, I don't know what to say to you. In California, 1 out of 3 students attend an overcrowded school and most of those students are Latino. Hospitals and emergency rooms are overcrowded (http://californiawatch.org/dailyrepo...dy-finds-17435). And they're the largest receivers of government aid (http://cis.org/immigrant-welfare-use-2011).
See the reasons above. Also, you can't compare the society and economy of 1900s America to today. The population was 250 million lower, the US wasn't primarily a service sector economy like it is today (meaning most immigrants back then were laborers, factory workers, or lived a self sustained rural farm life that didn't necessarily require them to be capable English speakers). You're whole argument is based on an ideal ("Give us your poor...") that may have been possible to realize when the United States had under 100 million people, an industrialized economy, and a wide open West, but that is no longer reality.My great-grandparents on my mother's side spoke German and not a lick of English. On my father's side they spoke Italian and no English. Sure, their kids (my parents) learned the language, and so did their kids and their kids, but why is it so important to you that today's 1st generation immigrants speak your language?
I think I've made the delineation clear. Those immigrants and guest workers (ex. our very own Brazil) you speak of are often: educated, skilled, and multilingual, qualities they possess before they emigrate.Do you understand the difference between an immigrant and someone who tries to become a citizen? Many many people move here for reasons outside of their own volition. We live in an internationalized economy, global businesses ask their employees to perform overseas duties for pre-defined durations. Yet you think any "foreigner" who obtains the necessary work permits to live here should pledge allegiance to a foreign country? Or do you view "immigration" as "brown people hopping the Rio Grande" and generalize the immigrant population?
No, I don't think they should "pledge allegiance," and never even suggested such. I would just like to see some courtesy and manners. If I was a guest worker in England, I wouldn't boorishly celebrate the 4th of July on my front lawn while screaming, "Murica, Yeah!" And yes, I support a Mexican's right to walk through the streets waving his Mexican flag and yelling, "Viva La Raza." That doesn't mean I have to celebrate it as a shining example of "diversity" and not acknowledge that person as someone who doesn't really appreciate the country he is living and working in.
And that was reformed.Again, do you understand what an immigrant is vs. someone applying for citizenship? Nationalism is one of the most dangerous concepts aside from religion in the history of civilization, which you so like to espouse your knowledge about re: ancient rome. There is no legal basis for an immigrant to the US to learn the language or espouse allegiance, and rightfully so. Do you propose establishing these requirements on American immigrants? Did you know that until 1920, there was no such thing as an "illegal" immigrant, that anyone could move to the US without question of their allegiance?
If what you think I'm espousing is Nationalism, you need to get more familiar with the concept.
That's great, but it's a false equivalency. Your experience as an American Expat in Europe is irrelevant to the United States' current immigrant situation.I'm an American citizen, I've obtained work permits in Belgium, Switzerland, and Italy and lived and worked in those countries on and off over the last 10 years. I speak some of their 4 languages (German, French, Flemish, Italian) in varying degrees, from fluent to taxi/restaurant. I've never applied for citizenship. But by your prescription I should have never been allowed to seek work and live a normal life in those places unless I learn their languages fluently and pledge allegiance to their flags.
Get the out of here. That's why I called you "stoopid". Don't try to preach the life of an expat unless you've lived it. Stick to clowning the Lakers.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
