Do citations metrics like "Impact Factor" take into account how something was cited? Regardless there are only 10 cites out of over 225 listed that were not positive and they are easy to spot on
that list as they do not include a link.
Please stop spreading misinformation, I do not have a list of "anti-AGW scientific papers", I have a list of papers that support skeptic arguments against ACC/AGW Alarmism. Again read the "
Rebuttals to Criticism" section of the list,
Criticism: Papers on the list do not argue against AGW.
Rebuttal: This is a strawman argument as the list not only includes papers that support skeptic arguments against ACC/AGW but also Alarmism. Thus, a paper does not have to argue against AGW to still support skeptic arguments against alarmist conclusions (e.g. Hurricanes are getting worse due to global warming). Valid skeptic arguments include that AGW is exaggerated or inconsequential, such as those made by
Richard S. Lindzen Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Science at MIT and
John R. Christy Ph.D. Professor of Atmospheric Science at UHA.