Reply With Quote
We're discussing how you built a straw man in an attempt to race bait.
The very race baiting you are engaging in right now.Why do you think he blocked it from being aired?
yup I was right:
"By 1938, the crime rate was at an all-time low because repeat offenders were being sent to a concentration camp after they had completed their second sentence. Anyone who did not have a permanent address and some visible means of support was hauled off the Dachau and put to work."
maybe Bloomberg can put the homeless to work
We're discussing how you built a straw man in an attempt to race bait.
The very race baiting you are engaging in right now.Why do you think he blocked it from being aired?
Are you saying that what Bloomberg said is not racist?
Are you?
I'm saying you are race baiting based on a straw man you made.
Do you ever answer a question the first time you are asked?
How is me calling Bloomberg's statement racist race baiting?
See this is the problem with the leftist brain. You laugh off common sense solutions that work in favor of re ed Muh feels type . You're basically a woman..you just have two tiny little pebbles there where the vagina should be. And yes everyone should have to work. Hundreds of years ago what would have happened if someone didn't work? And why should today be any different?
Yeah. Lay out your plan for a lazy labor camp instead of ad hominems, das puss.
work for welfare program. food stamps aren't just given, they are earned at local federal work camps
You haven't.
Self-explanatory tbh.How is me calling Bloomberg's statement racist race baiting?
*Willfully Ignored Post*
Bull . And another non answer from you as expected.
A truism willfully ignored by me as to not derail the thread.
I don't think what he said was racist. Probably just statistically inaccurate.
I can see why you are so excited though. Gives you a chance to race bait. Good for you.
I don't race bait and I never have. I've been here long enough for you too know this. This thread was about the media turning a blind eye to Bloomberg's obviously racist statements.
What's racist about it?
I believe he exaggerated the percentage he listed, but he didn't call for a law to discriminate on the basis of race as you keep trying to claim.
and if they don't want to work, fuehrer?
denying rights to a certain group based upon a perceived trend. yeah that's racist, take it from me, i'm a racist and i would know. the problem is i'm not scared and don't shy away from it. science is racist, facts are racist, i don't really care but what bloomberg said is racist. and i don't even give a that he's racist, i give a that he gets away with it while others have to watch themselves or people get all pissy. the left wields the r-word as a weapon of political gain while they are the biggest racists around. who was the pro slavery party again? yep, dems.
they'd work, starving is painful and after 2 days without eating they'd show up at the camp to work and then they'd get fed.
Who said he wanted to deny a right to a certain group?
He said he wanted guns out of their hands. There are ways to do that without passing a law that discriminates on the basis of race.
Are you guys being willfully stupid or can you not help it?
Explain to me how one would get guns out of a demographics hands while basing the citeria on age and skin color without being racist. Best of luck.
Lol you'll need to provide a quote of me claiming he called for a law to disarm based on race. Also find examples of me race baiting while you're at it.
This thread has a rail?
Oh yeah. Its about the coverage/not coverage of a stupid statement. Carry on.
smh
Bloomberg getting away with it was the entire point of the thread.
Easy. Prohibit guns away from a larger demographic that includes the subset.
No racial component needed.
And that's only if you are talking about laws.
Which you assumed without evidence.
lol "good luck"
I'm not saying any such law would be effective; which is why I won't assume he is talking only about laws.
When the statement comes from the face of control who's poured hundreds of millions of dollars into his cause it's a bit more than a stupid statement.
How big should this story be?
Front page on every paper in the country?
Lead story on network news for a month of cycles?
Tell us.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
