Reply With Quote
why did you attach that video?
So now will you post evidence our ancestors were apes?
why did you attach that video?
For my peeps using Google.
You've posted that video on this forum about 100 times and it's been refuted to death. It brings nothing with it
page 878 and it still hasn't been refuted
Allowing you plenty of opertunities to try and debunk my videos.
You would think someone with your reputation would have at least made an effort to post any credible evidence man evoluvef from soup,
i've done so on about 10 different occasions where you've posted that video. go back and read them
it's already all been posted for you here. it's more of a morbid fascination that i come back to this thread to see if you're still posting the same re ed pics you have saved in your photobucket.
And you almost always are. It's uncanny.
, you are boring me to death.
Did someone say RANDOM?
It usually happens when you spend months on the www and can't find that proves humans Evolved from warm pools of liquid billions of years ago.
Researchers may have solved origin-of-life conundrum
The origin of life on Earth is a set of paradoxes. In order for life to have gotten started, there must have been a genetic molecule—something like DNA or RNA—capable of passing along blueprints for making proteins, the workhorse molecules of life. But modern cells can’t copy DNA and RNA without the help of proteins themselves. To make matters more vexing, none of these molecules can do their jobs without fatty lipids, which provide the membranes that cells need to hold their contents inside. And in yet another chicken-and-egg complication, protein-based enzymes (encoded by genetic molecules) are needed to synthesize lipids.
Now, researchers say they may have solved these paradoxes. Chemists report today that a pair of simple compounds, which would have been abundant on early Earth, can give rise to a network of simple reactions that produce the three major classes of biomolecules—nucleic acids, amino acids, and lipids—needed for the earliest form of life to get its start. Although the new work does not prove that this is how life started, it may eventually help explain one of the deepest mysteries in modern science.
http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2...life-conundrum
Last edited by boutons_deux; 03-16-2015 at 01:28 PM.
That info is will stay unread and never intelligently discussed in this forum where outdated re fried insults are more important than real discussion about new research being done and fantasies about one day having open minded replies on the subject matter.
cue the Blake
I read it and thought it was interesting. Did you read it? What do you want to discuss about it
How it helps to explain a porcupine evolving into a tiger.
You have a terrible, terrible understanding of evolution.
Your right can you please re post again the Evidence my ancestor was a Chimp I'm sorry I must of missed that day here at ST
A hippo and a fly having a common ancestor, I just don't see it. How could that happen? Why do we have the fly?
We all started off as an ocean thingy, then once these things came on land they started evolving into bugs,birds,worms, gorillas, cows, goats, frogs etc. Why?
So one of these things starts evolving into a monkey, why the need to become a gibbon, a chimp, an orangatan? And all those varieties of monkies? And why did this thing go that direction, why a monkey while others evolved into hornets and wasps and bees?
Last edited by Avante; 03-16-2015 at 09:11 PM.
And why did master designer allow a lot of his creations to go extinct?.
Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
So this little fishy thingy simply grew tired of being a fishy thingy, so "it" started changing, it started looking like a centipede. But it could have become a bear. While other "its" were evolving into giraffes and wolverines. Others ended up evolving into parrots and snails.
Those that became parrots weren't happy being just one species of parrot, oh no, they needed to be an African Grey, while others became Rosetta's, and Ring Necks, Senegals, adils, Meyers. We can't have just one parrot. And the reason for the variety is real obvious, right? Right now as we speak there is yet another parrot in some stage of evolution. By the year 2679 no telling how many new creatures evolved from todays cats, dogs and worms.
Look at how many stages of evolution it took to get the 2015 worm.
You take a kangaroo, a goat, a wasp and a pig, go away for 10 million years and when ya come back a whole other group of creatures, wow!
Last edited by Avante; 03-16-2015 at 10:51 PM.
That old Sun can just hang there as we spin around, and never lose a drop of water. We have creatures who can live under water, some who can fly, then some who can do neither. Some pretty amazing stuff.
But there was a time when we had no explantations for any of that, man just didn't have the answers because he hadn't evolved into a higher level of human being.
We are there now when it comes to trying to understand God/MasterDesigner. We are like the neantherthal and a hardon, he knows he has one but has no idea how it got there.
Hard to believe this can be traced back to a tadpole/pollywog.
Why some wanted to be country singers?
Why not?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
